An LQG Optimal Linear Controller for Control Systems with Packet Losses

Motivated by control applications over lossy packet networks, this paper considers the Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) optimal control problem in the discrete time setting and when packet losses may occur between the sensors and the estimation-control unit and between the latter and the actuation points. Previous work [1] shows that, for protocols where packets are acknowledged at the receiver (e.g. TCP- like protocols), the separation principle holds. Moreover, in this case the optimal LQG control is a linear function of the estimated state and there exist critical probabilities for the successful delivery of both observation and control packets, below which the optimal controller fails to stabilize the system. The existence of such critical values is determined by providing analytic upper and lower bounds on the cost functional, and stochastically characterizing their convergence properties in the infinite horizon. Finally, it turns out that when there is no feedback on whether a control packet has been delivered or not (e.g. UDP-like protocols), the LQG optimal controller is in general nonlinear, as shown in [2]. There exists a special case, i.e. the observation matrix C is invertible and there is no output noise. In this case this paper shows that the optimal control is linear and critical values for arrival probabilities exist and can be computed analytically.

[1]  B. Achiriloaie,et al.  VI REFERENCES , 1961 .

[2]  T. Katayama On the matrix Riccati equation for linear systems with random gain , 1976 .

[3]  Johan Nilsson,et al.  Analysis of real-time control systems with time delays , 1996, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Johan Nilsson,et al.  Real-Time Control Systems with Delays , 1998 .

[5]  Christoforos N. Hadjicostis,et al.  Feedback control utilizing packet dropping network links , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[6]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Distributed control applications within sensor networks , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  Qiang Ling,et al.  Optimal dropout compensation in networked control systems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[8]  Peter Seiler,et al.  Estimation with lossy measurements: jump estimators for jump systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  R. Murray,et al.  Optimal LQG Control Across a Packet-Dropping Link , 2004 .

[10]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Kalman filtering with intermittent observations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Optimal control of dynamical systems over unreliable communication links , 2004 .

[12]  Long Wang,et al.  Stabilization of networked control systems with data packet dropout via switched system approach , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508).

[13]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Optimal LQG Control over Lossy Packet Networks , 2005 .

[14]  J.P. Hespanha,et al.  Estimation under uncontrolled and controlled communications in Networked Control Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[15]  S. Sastry,et al.  Optimal control with unreliable communication: the TCP case , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[16]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  LQG CONTROL WITH MISSING OBSERVATION AND CONTROL PACKETS , 2005 .

[17]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  An H/sub /spl infin// approach to networked control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  Nicola Elia,et al.  Remote stabilization over fading channels , 2005, Syst. Control. Lett..

[19]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Optimal LQG control across packet-dropping links , 2007, Syst. Control. Lett..

[20]  Special Issue on Networked Control Systems , 2022 .