Cybermatrix Protocol: A Novel Approach to Highly Collaborative and Computationally Intensive Multidisciplinary Aircraft Optimization

This paper presents the cybermatrix protocol, a novel approach to multidisciplinary design optimization in the contex of many involved disciplinary experts and high use of high-performance computing resources. The approach is presented from its formal mathematical background to actual on-disk implementation of a running process. As the demonstration case, a twin-engine long-range transport aircraft is optimized. Two optimization processes are shown, an overall aircraft optimization (wing planform free) and a local parameter optimization (fixed planform), with five disciplines between them: overall aircraft wing planform design, aircraft synthesis and mission evaluation, aeroelastic wing airfoil design (RANS flow, trimmed static-aeroelastic state), maneuver loads evaluation and structural wing design (panel aerodynamics, global shell-element FEM model), and gust loads evaluation and selection (panel aerodynamics, dynamic FEM beam model). Optimized solutions are in line with those expected from previous studies under similar conditions, serving as a validation point for the new approach. Moreover, since the approach can deal flexibly with a higher-complexity loads subprocesses, such as configuration-specific selection of design load cases, also some interesting new effects are seen in optimized designs.

[1]  Sascha Dähne,et al.  Aeroelastic tailoring of an NLF forward swept wing , 2017 .

[2]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Communication in aircraft design : Can we establish a common language? , 2012 .

[3]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multipoint High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of a Transport Aircraft Configuration , 2014 .

[4]  Florian Wolters,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS TURBINE PERFORMANCE CODE AND ITS APPLICATION TO PRELIMINARY ENGINE DESIGN , 2011 .

[5]  Arthur Stück,et al.  An Adjoint-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Strategy for Trimmed Aircraft with Active Engines , 2017 .

[6]  Jason E. Hicken,et al.  Aerodynamic Optimization Algorithm with Integrated Geometry Parameterization and Mesh Movement , 2010 .

[7]  Michael Petsch,et al.  PANDORA - A python based framework for modelling and structural sizing of transport aircraft , 2018 .

[8]  Charles E. Dickerson,et al.  A Brief History of Models and Model Based Systems Engineering and the Case for Relational Orientation , 2013, IEEE Systems Journal.

[9]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  An asymmetric suboptimization approach to aerostructural optimization , 2009 .

[10]  J. Alonso,et al.  A Coupled-Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Method for High-Fidelity Aero-Structural Design , 2005 .

[11]  Stefan Keye,et al.  Overview of Collaborative Multi-Fidelity Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Activities in the DLR Project VicToria , 2020, AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM.

[12]  Christian Willberg,et al.  Automated model generation and sizing of aircraft structures , 2016 .

[13]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  The complex-step derivative approximation , 2003, TOMS.

[14]  Volker Schulz,et al.  One-Shot Methods for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2009 .

[15]  Carsten M. Liersch,et al.  A distributed toolbox for multidisciplinary preliminary aircraft design , 2011 .

[16]  T. Klimmek,et al.  CPACS-MONA – AN INDEPENDENT AND IN HIGH-FIDELITY BASED MDO TASKS INTEGRATED PROCESS FOR THE STRUCTURAL AND AEROELASTIC DESIGN OF AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATIONS , 2019 .

[17]  Charles Audet,et al.  Trade-off studies in blackbox optimization , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[18]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Multi-Level MDO of a Long-Range Transport Aircraft Using a Distributed Analysis Framework , 2017 .

[19]  John F. Dannenhoffer,et al.  Toward the Realization of a Highly Integrated, Multidisciplinary, Multifidelity Design Environment , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[20]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[21]  Anke Tröltzsch,et al.  A sequential quadratic programming algorithm for equality-constrained optimization without derivatives , 2014, Optimization Letters.

[22]  Miron Livny,et al.  Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation , 2015, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[23]  Charlie Vanaret,et al.  GEMS: A Python Library for Automation of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Process Generation , 2018 .

[24]  Gertjan Looye,et al.  UNIFYING MANOEUVRE AND GUST LOADS ANALYSIS MODELS , 2009 .

[25]  D Braun Robert,et al.  Post-Optimality Analysis in Aerospace Vehicle Design , 1993 .

[26]  Joel Brezillon,et al.  Investigation on Adjoint Based Gradient Computations for Realistic 3d Aero-Optimization , 2010 .

[27]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Automatic evaluation of multidisciplinary derivatives using a graph-based problem formulation in OpeNMDAO , 2014 .

[28]  Jeremy S. Agte,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1998 .

[29]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  Tim Lammering,et al.  An Integrated Environment for Preliminary Aircraft Design and Optimization , 2012 .

[31]  P. Samuelson Mathematics of Speculative Price , 1973 .

[32]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[33]  Dieter Kohlgrüber,et al.  A FINITE ELEMENT BASED TOOL CHAIN FOR STRUCTURAL SIZING OF TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT IN PRELIMINARY AIRCRAFT DESIGN , 2013 .

[34]  Thomas Backhaus,et al.  Integration of High-Fidelity Analysis Tools in MDO Frameworks for HPC , 2019, AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum.

[35]  F. H. Adler Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[36]  Charlie Vanaret,et al.  Towards the Industrialization of New MDO Methodologies and Tools for Aircraft Design , 2017 .

[37]  Graeme J. Kennedy,et al.  An evaluation of constraint aggregation strategies for wing box mass minimization , 2017 .

[38]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A parallel aerostructural optimization framework for aircraft design studies , 2014 .

[39]  Antoine Dumont,et al.  Transonic Wing-body Civil Transport Aircraft Aero-Structural Design Optimization using a Bi-Level High Fidelity Approach - A Focus on the Aerodynamic Process , 2013 .

[40]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 1998 .

[41]  Stefan Keye,et al.  Sensitivity-based Multifidelity Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Powered Aircraft Subject to a Comprehensive Set of Loads , 2020 .

[42]  Thomas Klimmek,et al.  Parametric Set-Up of a Structural Model for FERMAT Configuration for Aeroelastic and Loads Analysis , 2014 .

[43]  Norbert Kroll,et al.  MEGADESIGN and MegaOpt - German Initiatives for Aerodynamic Simulation and Optimization in Aircraft Design , 2009 .

[44]  Andreas Griewank,et al.  Extension of fixed point PDE solvers for optimal design by one-shot method , 2008 .

[45]  Arno Ronzheimer,et al.  Aircraft Wing Optimization Using High Fidelity Closely Coupled CFD and CSM Methods , 2010 .

[46]  Manuel Pusch,et al.  Integrated optimization of control surface layout for gust load alleviation , 2019, CEAS Aeronautical Journal.

[47]  P. M. Fischer,et al.  Open source software framework for applications in aeronautics and space , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[48]  Michael Meinel,et al.  The FlowSimulator framework for massively parallel CFD applications , 2010 .

[49]  S. Takanashi,et al.  Iterative three-dimensional transonic wing design using integral equations , 1985 .

[50]  Surya N. Patnaik,et al.  Optimality of a fully stressed design , 1998 .

[51]  Jean-Antoine Désidéri,et al.  AEROSTRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION WITH THE ADJOINT METHOD , 2011 .

[52]  Andy B. Yoo,et al.  Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited X-ray Pulse Compression Using Strained Crystals X-ray Pulse Compression Using Strained Crystals , 2002 .

[53]  A. DeBlois,et al.  Development of a Multilevel Multidisciplinary-Optimization Capability for an Industrial Environment , 2013 .

[54]  Gianfranco La Rocca,et al.  Composing MDAO symphonies : Graph-based generation and manipulation of large multidisciplinary systems , 2017 .

[55]  C. Ilic,et al.  DLR project Digital-X: towards virtual aircraft design and flight testing based on high-fidelity methods , 2015, CEAS Aeronautical Journal.

[56]  G. Schuhmacher,et al.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY AIRFRAME DESIGN OPTIMISATION , 2012 .

[57]  Mohammad Abu-Zurayk,et al.  Aero-Elastic Multipoint Optimization Using the Coupled Adjoint Approach , 2014 .