A randomized wait-list control trial to evaluate the impact of a mobile application to improve self-management of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a study protocol

BackgroundManagement of diabetes through improved glycemic control and risk factor modification can help prevent long-term complications. Much diabetes management is self-management, in which healthcare providers play a supporting role. Well-designed e-Health solutions targeting behavior change can improve a range of measures, including glycemic control, perceived health, and a reduction in hospitalizations.MethodsThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate if a mobile application designed to improve self-management among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) improves glycemic control compared to usual care. The secondary objectives are to determine the effects on patient experience and health system costs; evaluate how and why the intervention worked as observed; and gain insight into considerations for system-wide scale-up. This pragmatic, randomized, wait-list-control trial will recruit adult participants from three Diabetes Education Programs in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome is glycemic control (measured by HbA1c). Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported experience measures, health system utilization, and intervention usability. The primary outcome will be analyzed using an ANCOVA, with continuous secondary outcomes analyzed using Poisson regression. Direct observations will be conducted of the implementation and application-specific training sessions provided to each site. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants, healthcare providers, organizational leaders, and system stakeholders as part of the embedded process evaluation. Thematic analysis will be applied to the qualitative data in order to describe the relationships between (a) key contextual factors, (b) the mechanisms by which they effect the implementation of the intervention, and (c) the impact on the outcomes of the intervention, according to the principles of Realist Evaluation.DiscussionThe use of mobile health and virtual tools is on the rise in health care, but the evidence of their effectiveness is mixed and their evaluation is often lacking key contextual data. Results from this study will provide much needed information about the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a mobile application to improve diabetes self-management. The process evaluation will provide valuable insight into the contextual factors that influence the application effectiveness, which will inform the potential for adoption and scale.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02813343. Registered on 24 June 2016 (retrospectively registered).Trial Sponsor: Ontario Telemedicine Network

[1]  James O Prochaska,et al.  Transtheoretical model intervention for adherence to lipid-lowering drugs. , 2006, Disease management : DM.

[2]  J. Lowery,et al.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[3]  C. Schmid,et al.  Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[4]  W. Manning,et al.  Estimating Log Models: To Transform or Not to Transform? , 1999, Journal of health economics.

[5]  E. Keeler,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[6]  Anita Kothari,et al.  A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. , 2013, Health policy.

[7]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Telemedicine in diabetes foot care delivery: health care professionals’ experience , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  Nan Luo,et al.  The EQ-5D-5L index score is more discriminative than the EQ-5D-3L index score in diabetes patients , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  Ian Harvey,et al.  A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[10]  Russell E. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research , 2006, Evaluation & the health professions.

[11]  CC Quinn,et al.  Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1934–1942 , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[12]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[13]  Whitney Berta,et al.  Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review , 2015, Implementation Science.

[14]  J. McNeil,et al.  Coaching patients On Achieving Cardiovascular Health (COACH): a multicenter randomized trial in patients with coronary heart disease. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Karen Fitzner,et al.  Telehealth--an effective delivery method for diabetes self-management education? , 2013, Population health management.

[16]  M. Huffman,et al.  Health coaching: a new and exciting technique to enhance patient self-management and improve outcomes. , 2007, Home healthcare nurse.

[17]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Applying ethnography to the study of context in healthcare quality and safety , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[18]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Systematic review and evaluation of web-accessible tools for management of diabetes and related cardiovascular risk factors by patients and healthcare providers , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Walter P. Wodchis,et al.  Guidelines on Person-Level Costing Using Administrative Databases in Ontario , 2013 .

[20]  E. Eldrup,et al.  Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1 , 2009, Diabetologia.

[21]  Mae Keary,et al.  The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[22]  Jae-Hyoung Cho,et al.  Mobile communication using a mobile phone with a glucometer for glucose control in Type 2 patients with diabetes: as effective as an Internet-based glucose monitoring system , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  Stanton Newman,et al.  A Mobile Telehealth Intervention for Adults With Insulin-Requiring Diabetes: Early Results of a Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, JMIR research protocols.

[24]  Issued December,et al.  AADE7™ Self-Care Behaviors American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) Position Statement , 2014 .

[25]  David Moher,et al.  Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, The Lancet.

[26]  J. Shaw,et al.  Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. , 2014, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.

[27]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee , 2013 .

[28]  C. Quinn,et al.  WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[29]  Ross T Tsuyuki,et al.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus management in Canada: is it improving? , 2013, Canadian journal of diabetes.

[30]  C. Quinn,et al.  Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Mobile Phone Personalized Behavioral Intervention for Blood Glucose Control , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[31]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  Jason Gilmore,et al.  Diabetes-prevalence and care practices. , 2008, Health reports.

[33]  W. Groot,et al.  The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[34]  Sophie V. Eastwood,et al.  Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  O. Pedersen,et al.  Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Xueli Yang,et al.  Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[37]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[38]  Donna M Zulman,et al.  The influence of diabetes psychosocial attributes and self-management practices on change in diabetes status. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.