Numeracy education through mobile apps

The concept of curriculum integration (CI) has been repeatedly recommended as a curriculum design for the middle years of schooling but the extant literature is confusing, ambiguous and guidance and direction for teachers who want to implement CI in their classrooms. Teachers’ knowledge and understanding about CI is often hazy with the result that despite the best intentions, design and implementation of CI can be haphazard and ineffective. This article critically reviews the relevant literature of CI with an emphasis on identifying typical pitfalls and that designs for CI need to consider the ways different subjects are organised and taught. It investigates teachers’ beliefs about CI in two middle schools in Tasmania. The article argues the case for a pragmatic approach to CI design and implementation in the middle years in Australian contexts, with a view to developing a robust network of shared knowledge and understanding designing and implementing high quality CI programs. 16 Middle Years of Schooling Association – Volume 14 – Number 1 – May 2014 – www.adolescentsuccess.org.au Middle Years of Schooling Association – Volume 14 – Number 1 – May 2014 – www.adolescentsuccess.org.au 17 Refereed Refereed

[1]  Sue Thomson,et al.  Highlights from TIMSS & PIRLS 2011 from Australia’s perspective , 2012 .

[2]  J. McGonigal Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[3]  Prasart Nuangchalerm,et al.  In-Service Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2011 .

[4]  Terry Haydn,et al.  Teacher education and ICT : some points for consideration from the UK , 2008 .

[5]  Chris Campbell,et al.  A framework for categorising mobile applications in mathematics education , 2013 .

[6]  Marcelo Milrad,et al.  Trade-offs between pedagogical and technological design requirements affecting the robustness of a mobile learning activity , 2011 .

[7]  Gawaian Bodkin-Andrews,et al.  The Utility of General Self-Esteem and Domain-Specific Self-Concepts: Their Influence on Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Students' Educational Outcomes , 2010 .

[8]  Athanassios Jimoyiannis Developing a Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Science Education: Implications of a Teacher Trainers' Preparation Program , 2010 .

[9]  Lawrence Manion,et al.  Research Methods in Education, 7th Edition , 2011 .

[10]  Seng Chee Tan,et al.  Nurturing preservice teachers’ understanding of technology-enhanced pedagogy through reflection , 2010 .

[11]  Thomas J. Cooper,et al.  Developing mathematics understanding through cognitive diagnostic assessment tasks , 2008 .

[12]  J. McNiff Action Research Principles and Practice , 1988 .

[13]  William Muirhead,et al.  Tablet PCs and reconceptualizing learning with technology: a case study in higher education , 2011, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ..

[14]  Bob Lingard,et al.  Teachers and Schooling Making A Difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance , 2020 .

[15]  T. A. Hastings Factors that predict quality classroom technology use , 2009 .

[16]  H. Sollervall,et al.  Outdoor Activities for the Learning of Mathematics: Designing with Mobile Technologies for Transitions across Learning Contexts , 2012, 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education.

[17]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[18]  Daniel Churchill,et al.  Educational affordances of PDAs: A study of a teacher's exploration of this technology , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Preparing Tomorrow's Science Teachers to Use Technology: Guidelines for Science Educators , 2000 .

[20]  Su-Ling Hsueh,et al.  An investigation of the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge framework in successful Chinese language classrooms , 2008 .

[21]  Nick Kelly,et al.  Integrating technology, pedagogy and content in mathematics education , 2012 .

[22]  Michael Cavanagh,et al.  Technological pedagogical content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers , 2013 .

[23]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[24]  Sue Thomson,et al.  International mathematics and science study shows mixed results for Australia , 2009 .

[25]  Donna Pendergast,et al.  Engaging the Middle Years in Mathematics , 2011 .

[26]  Martin Carnoy,et al.  What Does Globalization Mean for Educational Change? A Comparative Approach , 2002, Comparative Education Review.

[27]  Tania Aspland,et al.  The four attributes model of the middle school teacher , 2010 .

[28]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2007 .

[29]  G. Orme,et al.  Emotional Intelligence , 2003 .

[30]  Wajeeh M. Daher,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Learning Using Mobile Phones , 2009 .

[31]  Donna Miller,et al.  The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics - World Class for Déjà Vu , 2012 .

[32]  Ramón F. Ferreiro Criterios de calidad de una buena práctica para la aplicación de las TIC a nivel de institución Quality criteria of best practice for the implementation of ICT - level institution , 2012 .

[33]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  The influence of ICT on the interactivity of teaching , 2008, Education and Information Technologies.

[34]  D. Pendergast,et al.  Teaching Middle Years: Rethinking Curriculum, Pedagogy, and Assessment , 2006 .

[35]  Ulf Fredriksson,et al.  Innovative use of ICT in schools based on the findings in ELFE project , 2008, Education and Information Technologies.

[36]  Shirley Alexander,et al.  Beyond the classroom: a new digital education for young Australians in the 21st century , 2013 .

[37]  Boris Handal Mapping numeracy across the middle years , 2013 .

[38]  Judith Miller,et al.  Health and Physical Education: ICT and general capabilities in the Australian Curriculum , 2012 .

[39]  Adriana Gewerc,et al.  Do innovation projects with ICT enhance learning? Experiences from case studies in Galician schools , 2011 .

[40]  Sue Thomson,et al.  Challenges for Australian education , 2011 .