Variations of the aortic arch – a study on the most common branching patterns

Background Anatomical variants of the aortic arch and its branching patterns often appear as an incidental finding during routine computed tomography (CT) scanning. These variations can be of relevance when performing angiography or endovascular interventions and may cause symptoms such as dysphagia. Purpose To analyze common anatomical variations found within the arteries originating from the aortic arch in patients using contrast CT imaging techniques. Material and Methods A total of 2033 contrast CT scans were analyzed. To obtain a truly representative sample, cases were chosen from different hospital departments without previous knowledge of the patient history. Results The total percentage of variations within the analyzed patients was 13.3%. In 8.0% a truncus bicaroticus was found. 4.2% of the patients showed a left vertebral artery originating directly from the aortic arch, mostly proximal, and in 1 case distal to the left subclavian artery. In 1.0% we found an aberrant right subclavian artery. We also found a single case of a right descending aortic arch. Conclusion Variations of the aortic arch and its branching are frequently found, mostly as an incidental finding during routine diagnostic scanning. A contrast-enhanced CT scan is a good method with which to study the aortic arch and its associated branching pattern.

[1]  V. Jain,et al.  Variants and Anomalies of Thoracic Vasculature on Computed Tomographic Angiography in Adults , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  G. Mathew,et al.  Aberrant subclavian artery: anatomical curiosity or clinical entity. , 2009, International journal of surgery.

[3]  C. Derdeyn,et al.  Techniques of carotid angioplasty and stenting. , 2007, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[4]  S. Satti,et al.  Cervical vertebral artery variations: an anatomic study. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  D F Kallmes,et al.  Bovine aortic arch variant in humans: clarification of a common misnomer. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  M. Henneberg,et al.  Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch: a recent study of a South Australian population. , 2005, Folia morphologica.

[7]  D. Golub.  Die Entwicklung des Aortenbogens und der von ihm ausgehenden Äste bei Säugetieren , 1931, Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[8]  A. Garg,et al.  Aortic arch variation: a unique case with anomalous origin of both vertebral arteries as additional branches of the aortic arch distal to left subclavian artery. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  J. Gielecki,et al.  Digital-image analysis of the aortic arch's development and its variations. , 2004, Folia Morphologica.

[10]  E. Karaarslan,et al.  Separate origins of the left internal and external carotid arteries from the aortic arch: MR angiographic findings. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  B. Wasserman,et al.  Bilateral arch origin of the vertebral arteries. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  W. Berdon.  Rings, slings, and other things: vascular compression of the infant trachea updated from the midcentury to the millennium--the legacy of Robert E. Gross, MD, and Edward B. D. Neuhauser, MD. , 2000, Radiology.