Examining the link between competition and negative co‐occurrence patterns

Negative species co-occurrence patterns have long intrigued ecologists because of their potential link to competition. Although manipulative field experiments have consistently revealed evidence of competition in natural communities, there is little evidence that this competition produces negative co-occurrence patterns. Evidence does suggest that abiotic variation, dispersal limitation, and herbivory can contribute to patterns of negative cooccurrence among species; it is possible these influences have obscured a link with competition. Here, we test for a connection between negative co-occurrence and competition by examining a small-scale, relatively homogeneous old-field plant community where the influence of abiotic variation was likely to be minimal and we accounted for the impact of herbivory with an herbivore exclosure treatment. Using three years of data (two biennial periods), we tested whether negatively co-occurring pairs of species, when occasionally found together, experienced asymmetric abundance decline more frequently than positively co-occurring pairs, for which there is no such expectation. We found no evidence that negatively co-occurring pairs consistently suffered asymmetric abundance decline more frequently than positively co-occurring pairs, providing no evidence that competition is a primary driver of negative co-occurrence patterns in this community. Our results were consistent across control and herbivore exclosure treatments, suggesting that herbivores are not driving patterns of negative species co-occurrence in this community. Any influence of competition or herbivory on co-occurrence patterns is small enough that it is obscured by other factors such as substrate heterogeneity, dispersal, and differential species responses to climatic variation through time. We interpret our results as providing evidence that competition is not responsible for producing negative cooccurrence patterns in our study community and suggest that this may be the case more broadly.

[1]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  A consumer's guide to evenness indices , 1996 .

[2]  Yi Ding,et al.  Changes in Patterns of Species Co‐occurrence across Two Tropical Cloud Forests Differing in Soil Nutrients and Air Temperature , 2015 .

[3]  S. Arnott,et al.  Dispersal strength influences zooplankton co-occurrence patterns in experimental mesocosms. , 2015, Ecology.

[4]  L. Aarssen,et al.  The impact of non‐reproductive plant species on assessments of community structure and species co‐occurrence patterns , 2016 .

[5]  A. Bar‐Massada,et al.  Complex relationships between species niches and environmental heterogeneity affect species co-occurrence patterns in modelled and real communities , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Diogo S. M. Samia,et al.  Functional diversity: an overview of its history and applicability , 2015 .

[7]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  cooccur: Probabilistic Species Co-Occurrence Analysis in R , 2016 .

[8]  L. Stone,et al.  The checkerboard score and species distributions , 1990, Oecologia.

[9]  S. Dray,et al.  A guide for using functional diversity indices to reveal changes in assembly processes along ecological gradients , 2013 .

[10]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[11]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Effects of ‘Target’ Plant Species Body Size on Neighbourhood Species Richness and Composition in Old-Field Vegetation , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[13]  T. Fagerström,et al.  Competition and coexistence in plant communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Asymmetric competition between plant species , 2001 .

[15]  Qingsong Yang,et al.  Tree species co‐occurrence patterns change across grains: insights from a subtropical forest , 2018 .

[16]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  SPECIES CO‐OCCURRENCE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF J. M. DIAMOND'S ASSEMBLY RULES MODEL , 2002 .

[17]  D. Tilman,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability , 2012 .

[18]  S. Dullinger,et al.  Weak and variable relationships between environmental severity and small‐scale co‐occurrence in alpine plant communities , 2007 .

[19]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The checkered history of checkerboard distributions. , 2013, Ecology.

[20]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[21]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[22]  J. Heino.  Does dispersal ability affect the relative importance of environmental control and spatial structuring of littoral macroinvertebrate communities? , 2012, Oecologia.

[23]  K. Hall,et al.  Plant species segregation on different spatial scales in semi-natural grasslands , 2008 .

[24]  J. Rusak,et al.  A comparative evaluation of five common pairwise tests of species association. , 2019, Ecology.

[25]  Kelly A. Carscadden,et al.  Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services , 2011 .

[26]  Korňan.  Null model analysis of spatial species associations in spruce, tree line and dwarf-pine bird assemblages in the High Tatras, the Western Carpathians , 2016 .

[27]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Dispersal as a key element of community structure: the case of ground beetles on lake islands , 2006 .

[28]  J. P. Grime,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN THREE PERENNIAL GRASSES , 1976 .

[29]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  The empirical Bayes approach as a tool to identify non-random species associations , 2010, Oecologia.

[30]  Graham Bell,et al.  THE CO‐DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES IN RELATION TO THE NEUTRAL THEORY OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[31]  Joseph A. Veech,et al.  A probabilistic model for analysing species co-occurrence , 2013 .

[32]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? - evidence from pair-wise experiments , 2004 .

[33]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .

[34]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[35]  E. Tzanatos,et al.  From sampling stations to archipelagos: investigating aspects of the assemblage of insular biota , 2004 .

[36]  C. Woodall,et al.  Does biodiversity make a difference? Relationships between species richness, evolutionary diversity, and aboveground live tree biomass across U.S. forests. , 2014 .

[37]  L. Aarssen,et al.  The role of plant species size in invasibility: a field experiment , 2010, Oecologia.

[38]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[39]  Craig Loehle,et al.  On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. , 1990 .

[40]  Lin Jiang,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity stabilizes community biomass , 2014 .

[41]  P. Choler,et al.  FACILITATION AND COMPETITION ON GRADIENTS IN ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2001 .

[42]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Community structure and positive interactions in constraining environments , 2005 .

[43]  N. Gotelli.  Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .

[44]  J. Maron,et al.  Seed dispersal is more limiting to native grassland diversity than competition or seed predation , 2014 .

[45]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Neighbour manipulations in natural vegetation a review , 1990 .

[46]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta‐analysis of Field Experiments , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[47]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Checkerboard score–area relationships reveal spatial scales of plant community structure , 2018 .

[48]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co‐occurrence , 2018 .

[49]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[50]  J. Harper,et al.  Studies on plant demography Ranunculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R. acris L. I. Population flux and survivorship , 1973 .

[51]  A. Hastings.  Can competition be detected using species co-occurrence data? , 1987 .

[52]  F. Maestre,et al.  Nurse plant effects on plant species richness in drylands: the role of grazing, rainfall and species specificity. , 2012, Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics.