Small-world topology of functional connectivity in randomly connected dynamical systems

Characterization of real-world complex systems increasingly involves the study of their topological structure using graph theory. Among global network properties, small-world property, consisting in existence of relatively short paths together with high clustering of the network, is one of the most discussed and studied. When dealing with coupled dynamical systems, links among units of the system are commonly quantified by a measure of pairwise statistical dependence of observed time series (functional connectivity). We argue that the functional connectivity approach leads to upwardly biased estimates of small-world characteristics (with respect to commonly used random graph models) due to partial transitivity of the accepted functional connectivity measures such as the correlation coefficient. In particular, this may lead to observation of small-world characteristics in connectivity graphs estimated from generic randomly connected dynamical systems. The ubiquity and robustness of the phenomenon are documented by an extensive parameter study of its manifestation in a multivariate linear autoregressive process, with discussion of the potential relevance for nonlinear processes and measures.

[1]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[2]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[3]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[5]  E. Langford,et al.  Is the Property of Being Positively Correlated Transitive? , 2001 .

[6]  M. Paluš,et al.  The role of nonlinearity in computing graph-theoretical properties of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging brain networks. , 2011, Chaos.

[7]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  Uri T Eden,et al.  Network inference with confidence from multivariate time series. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Yong He,et al.  Graph-based network analysis of resting-state functional MRI. , 2010 .

[10]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[11]  Weibing Deng,et al.  Self-similarity and network perspective of the Chinese fund market , 2011 .

[12]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[15]  Yong He,et al.  Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Paul J. Roebber,et al.  The architecture of the climate network , 2004 .

[17]  Klaus Lehnertz,et al.  Unraveling Spurious Properties of Interaction Networks with Tailored Random Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Shilpa Chakravartula,et al.  Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2014 .

[19]  Klaus Lehnertz,et al.  From brain to earth and climate systems: Small-world interaction networks or not? , 2011, Chaos.

[20]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[21]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI: Is linear correlation sufficient? , 2011, NeuroImage.

[22]  Milan Paluš,et al.  Discerning connectivity from dynamics in climate networks , 2011 .

[23]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  Potsdam,et al.  Complex networks in climate dynamics. Comparing linear and nonlinear network construction methods , 2009, 0907.4359.