The forest ranger revisited: A study of control practices and identification

This study was conducted for the purposes of: (1) describing current control practices in the U.S. Forest Service, an organization frequently cited as an excellent organization due to a dated but classic study, and (2) field testing three claims made in Tompkins and Cheney's theory of unobtrusive control, including: (a) unobtrusive control practices are associated with organizational identification, (b) members who report higher organizational identification use organizational premises in their decision making, (c) members who report higher organizational identification consider the organization as they consider the consequences of decisions. Findings indicated that: (1) control practices have changed from more unobtrusive to more obtrusive, and (2) theoretical claims were supported. Several implications are discussed. The value of the method employed to generating longitudinal research is discussed. The study illustrates the pragmatic relevance of organizational identification. Drawing on the experience ...

[1]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Participation, Satisfaction, and Productivity: A Meta-Analytic Review , 1986 .

[2]  S. T. Dana Forest and Range Policy , 1956 .

[3]  P. Bromiley,et al.  Deadlines, routines, and change , 1987 .

[4]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[5]  K. Gaertner,et al.  Federal Agencies in the Context of Transition: A Contrast between Democratic and Organizational Theories , 1983 .

[6]  R. F. Szafran Control Structures in Religious Organizations , 1981 .

[7]  John T. Scholz,et al.  Regulatory Enforcement in a Federalist System , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[8]  George Cheney,et al.  On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification , 1983 .

[9]  J. Coleman Power and the Structure of Society , 1975 .

[10]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[11]  C. Barnard The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[12]  Gary J. Miller,et al.  A Social Choice Perspective on Expertise and Authority in Bureaucracy , 1985 .

[13]  A. Jaeger,et al.  Multinational Corporations: Control Systems and Delegation Issues , 1984 .

[14]  Peter K. Manning,et al.  Organizational Work: Structuration of Environments , 1982 .

[15]  T. Deal,et al.  Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. , 1982 .

[16]  Scott T. Moore,et al.  The Theory of Street-Level Bureaucracy , 1987 .

[17]  P. Berman Learning to comply , 1982 .

[18]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[19]  O. F. Robinson,et al.  The Forest Service , 1975 .

[20]  Donald J. Pierce,et al.  Democracy in America , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[21]  Phillip K. Tompkins,et al.  Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment , 1987 .

[22]  J. Bendor,et al.  Stacking the Deck: Bureaucratic Missions and Policy Design , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[23]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In Search of Excellence , 1983 .

[24]  L. Gulick,et al.  American forest policy , 1952 .

[25]  Herbert Kaufman,et al.  The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior , 1960 .

[26]  K. Burke A Rhetoric of Motives , 1969 .

[27]  P. Goldman,et al.  Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century , 1980 .

[28]  K. Weick Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[29]  Michael E. Pacanowsky,et al.  Communication and organizational cultures , 1982 .

[30]  S. Deetz Critical interpretive research in organizational communication , 1982 .

[31]  M. Patchen,et al.  Participation, Achievement, and Involvement on the Job. , 1973 .

[32]  John Kenneth Galbraith The New Industrial State , 1967 .

[33]  A. Pettigrew On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[34]  George Cheney The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication , 1983 .

[35]  Wayne D. Rasmussen,et al.  Professional forestry in the United States , 1971 .

[36]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Personal factors in organizational identification. , 1970 .