Fighting the Flu: Developing Sustained Community Resilience and Preparedness

A pandemic will impose considerable demands on communities over a period of several weeks; thus, people must develop means to facilitate their resilience in such an event. This article describes the development and testing of a model to inform public education strategies to facilitate the sustained adoption of the preparedness and protective measures that underpin community resilience. The model is derived from the premise that decisions to act reflect how people interpret information to make it meaningful to them. The model describes how this outcome reflects the interaction among personal beliefs about preparing, community characteristics influencing how risk beliefs and risk management strategies are developed, and the relationship between the community and health information sources. It highlights a need to distinguish those who decide not to prepare from those who accept a need to prepare but need guidance. Implications for developing pandemic public education and risk communication programs are discussed.

[1]  Tony Waters,et al.  Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster , 1997 .

[2]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Empowerment evaluation principles in practice , 2005 .

[3]  M K Lindell,et al.  Correlates of Household Seismic Hazard Adjustment Adoption , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  I H Langford,et al.  A Quantitative Test of the Cultural Theory of Risk Perceptions: Comparison with the Psychometric Paradigm , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  The risk construct. , 1992 .

[6]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[7]  N. Luhmann Trust and Power , 1979 .

[8]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Social Trust , 1995 .

[9]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[10]  Susanne Rippl Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement , 2002 .

[11]  John-Paul Mulilis,et al.  A Person‐Relative‐to‐Event (PrE) Approach to Negative Threat Appeals and Earthquake Preparedness: A Field Study1 , 1999 .

[12]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Natural Hazard Resilience: The Role of Individual and Household Preparedness , 2006 .

[13]  Douglas Paton,et al.  When good intentions turn bad: Promoting natural hazard preparedness , 2005 .

[14]  Ian H. Langford,et al.  A Quantitative Test of the Cultural Theory of Risk Perceptions: Comparison with the Psychometric Paradigm , 1998 .

[15]  Keith Smith Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster , 1991 .

[16]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Trust, the Asymmetry Principle, and the Role of Prior Beliefs , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  E. Eng,et al.  Measuring Community Competence in the Mississippi Delta: The Interface between Program Evaluation and Empowerment , 1994, Health education quarterly.

[18]  N. Peterson,et al.  Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: Testing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains , 2000 .

[19]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  H. W. Kee,et al.  Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion , 1970 .

[21]  T. Earle,et al.  Thinking Aloud about Trust: A Protocol Analysis of Trust in Risk Management , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  R. Meertens,et al.  Priorities in Information Desire about Unknown Risks , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  D. Paton,et al.  Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach , 2006 .

[24]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Consequences of perceived risk: Demand for mitigation , 1999 .