Enabling analysis: Across the developmental divide

It is argued in this paper that at least certain strands of operational research (OR) carried out in less developed countries have intriguing similarities with community operational research. It follows that community OR, which is still short of accounts of actual practice, might learn from OR aimed at promoting the self-reliance of communities in developing countries. The paper starts with community operational research—its origin, nature, clientele, and methods. This is followed by a parallel discussion of the characteristics of operational research aligned with third-world community development. A final section explores the common themes between the two literatures and practices.

[1]  Colin Thunhurst,et al.  Housing in the Dearne Valley: Doing Community OR with the Thurnscoe Tenants Housing Co-operative. Part 2 — An Evaluation , 1992 .

[2]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Custom and Practice , 1986 .

[3]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  The role of operational research in less developed countries: A critical approach , 1990 .

[4]  S. Annis,et al.  Direct to the Poor: Grassroots Development in Latin America , 1988 .

[5]  Chris Chapman,et al.  My Two Cents Worth on How OR Should Develop , 1992 .

[6]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  A Black Ghetto's Research on a University , 1970, Oper. Res..

[7]  J. Mingers,et al.  Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited : problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict , 1989 .

[8]  Colin Eden.  Management Science Process—Problem Construction and the Influence of O.R. , 1982 .

[9]  THE SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRACTICE , 1991 .

[10]  K. Healy,et al.  What to Think about Cooperatives: A Guide from Bolivia , 1985 .

[11]  Chen Dequan,et al.  Popularization of Management Science in China , 1986 .

[12]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[13]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Some Methodologies for Community Operational Research , 1988 .

[14]  J. Friedmann.  Retracking America;: A theory of transactive planning , 1973 .

[15]  John Mingers,et al.  Community operational research: Its context and its future , 1991 .

[16]  Tony Tinker,et al.  One-Dimensional Management Science: The Making of a Technocratic Consciousness , 1984 .

[17]  C. Mar Molinero,et al.  Schools in Southampton: A Quantitative Approach to School Location, Closure and Staffing , 1988 .

[18]  Norman I. Fainstein,et al.  New debates in urban planning , 1979 .

[19]  R. Ackoff.  The Future of Operational Research is Past , 1979 .

[20]  John J. Bartholdi.  Operations Research in China , 1986 .

[21]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  A Materialist Analysis of Operational Research , 1982 .

[22]  István Kiss,et al.  Rethinking the Process of Operational Research and Systems Analysis , 1984 .

[23]  D. Kemball-Cook,et al.  The Search for Appropriate O.R.: A Review of Operational Research in Developing Countries , 1981 .

[24]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Into the Swamp: The Analysis of Social Issues , 1992 .

[25]  E. M. L. Beale.  Operational Research and Computers: A Personal View , 1980 .

[26]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  A Comment on Ackoff's “The Social Responsibility of Operational Research“ , 1975 .

[27]  Colin Eden,et al.  O.R. in the Community , 1981 .

[28]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  National Development Planning Revisited , 1977, Oper. Res..

[29]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Selected Readings in Operational Research for Developing Countries , 1983 .

[30]  Norman I. Fainstein,et al.  New Debates in Urban Planning: the Impact of Marxist Theory within the United States , 1979 .

[31]  Jonathan Rosenhead.  Some Further Comments on the Social Responsibility of Operational Research , 1976 .