The language of digital learning objects: A cross-disciplinary study

In order to determine the similarities and differences between disciplines in how each uses the language of teaching and learning, this study undertook linguistic analysis of 1,691 peer reviews in the MERLOT (Multimedia Educational Resources for Learning and Online Teaching) digital learning objects collection. Language concordancing software was used to identify trends particular to the sciences, the humanities and education. Findings specify the variation in word choice, sentence length, sentence structure and descriptive/analytic uses of language that emerged between the disciplines. Analyses suggest both points of convergence and divergence that can guide principles and standards for instructional design and cross-disciplinary dialogue and collaborations around teaching and learning.

[1]  Myra H. Strober,et al.  Habits of the Mind: Challenges for Multidisciplinary Engagement , 2006 .

[2]  Eniko Csomay,et al.  Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective , 2004 .

[3]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[4]  A. P. B. Sardinha.  Corpus linguistics - investigating language structure and use , 1999 .

[5]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 1991 .

[6]  Henry H. Bauer,et al.  Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS , 1990 .

[7]  David A. Wiley,et al.  The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version , 2000 .

[8]  Brian M. Dwyer.  Preparing for the 21st Century: A Paradigm for our Times , 1995 .

[9]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The cognitive style of PowerPoint , 2003 .

[10]  Désirée Motta-Roth,et al.  Book Reviews and Disciplinary Discourses: Defining a Genre. , 1995 .

[11]  R. N. Caine,et al.  Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain , 1991 .

[12]  K. Jaspers,et al.  The idea of the university , 1959 .

[13]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[14]  Marian L. Martinello,et al.  Interdisciplinary inquiry in teaching and learning , 1994 .

[15]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison , 2002 .

[16]  Carla Meskill,et al.  The Language of Teaching Well with Learning Objects , 2007 .

[17]  John Bradbeer,et al.  Barriers to Interdisciplinarity: Disciplinary discourses and student learning , 1999 .

[18]  H. W. Hodgins.  The Future of Learning Objects , 2002 .

[19]  Jack R. Lohmann,et al.  2002 ECI Conference on e-Technologies in Engineering Education: Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities , 2004 .

[20]  Bob Godwin-Jones.  Learning Objects: Scorn or SCORM? , 2004 .