Toward a clinical protocol for assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the human pupil response.

PURPOSE. To better understand the relative contributions of rod, cone, and melanopsin to the human pupillary light reflex (PLR) and to determine the optimal conditions for assessing the health of the rod, cone, and melanopsin pathways with a relatively brief clinical protocol. METHODS. PLR was measured with an eye tracker, and stimuli were controlled with a Ganzfeld system. In experiment 1, 2.5 log cd/m(2) red (640 ± 10 nm) and blue (467 ± 17 nm) stimuli of various durations were presented after dark adaptation. In experiments 2 and 3, 1-second red and blue stimuli were presented at different intensity levels in the dark (experiment 2) or on a 0.78 log cd/m(2) blue background (experiment 3). Based on the results of experiments 1 to 3, a clinical protocol was designed and tested on healthy control subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa and Leber's congenital amaurosis. RESULTS. The duration for producing the optimal melanopsin-driven sustained pupil response after termination of an intense blue stimulus was 1 second. PLR rod- and melanopsin-driven components are best studied with low- and high-intensity flashes, respectively, presented in the dark (experiment 2). A blue background suppressed rod and melanopsin responses, making it easy to assess the cone contribution with a red flash (experiment 3). With the clinical protocol, robust melanopsin responses could be seen in patients with few or no contributions from the rods and cones. CONCLUSIONS. It is possible to assess the rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the PLR with blue flashes at two or three intensity levels in the dark and one red flash on a blue background.

[1]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Visual Adaptation in Monkey Cones: Recordings of Late Receptor Potentials , 1970, Science.

[2]  A C Bird,et al.  Relationship between melatonin rhythms and visual loss in the blind. , 1997, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[3]  Philippe Denis,et al.  Melanopsin Bistability: A Fly's Eye Technology in the Human Retina , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN , 2005, Nature.

[6]  D Besch,et al.  Extraocular surgery for implantation of an active subretinal visual prosthesis with external connections: feasibility and outcome in seven patients , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Milea,et al.  Selective wavelength pupillometry in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy , 2010, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[8]  O. Bergamin,et al.  Latency of the pupil light reflex: sample rate, stimulus intensity, and variation in normal subjects. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  D. Berson,et al.  Phototransduction by Retinal Ganglion Cells That Set the Circadian Clock , 2002, Science.

[10]  Aki Kawasaki,et al.  Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2007, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[11]  Howard M. Cooper,et al.  Melanopsin-Dependent Nonvisual Responses: Evidence for Photopigment Bistability In Vivo , 2007, Journal of biological rhythms.

[12]  Aki Kawasaki,et al.  Chromatic pupil responses: preferential activation of the melanopsin-mediated versus outer photoreceptor-mediated pupil light reflex. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[13]  D. Birch,et al.  Psychophysical assessment of low visual function in patients with retinal degenerative diseases (RDDs) with the Diagnosys full-field stimulus threshold (D-FST) , 2009, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[14]  Rockefeller S. L. Young,et al.  Transient and sustained components of the pupil response evoked by achromatic spatial patterns , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  Randy H Kardon,et al.  Pupil light reflex in normal and diseased eyes: diagnosis of visual dysfunction using waveform partitioning. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[16]  Jean Bennett,et al.  Gene Therapy for Leber's Congenital Amaurosis is Safe and Effective Through 1.5 Years After Vector Administration , 2009, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[17]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Human and macaque pupil responses driven by melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells , 2007, Vision Research.

[18]  R. Kardon,et al.  Origin of the relative afferent pupillary defect in optic tract lesions. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Michael Kalloniatis,et al.  Characterisation of dark adaptation in human cone pathways: an application of the equivalent background hypothesis , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  Post-illumination pupil response in subjects without ocular disease. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Kathleen A. Marshall,et al.  Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber's congenital amaurosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  K. Yau,et al.  Diminished Pupillary Light Reflex at High Irradiances in Melanopsin-Knockout Mice , 2003, Science.

[23]  T. Badea,et al.  Melanopsin cells are the principal conduits for rod–cone input to non-image-forming vision , 2008, Nature.

[24]  H. M. Petry,et al.  Vision improvement in retinal degeneration patients by implantation of retina together with retinal pigment epithelium. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  M G Maguire,et al.  Portable pupillography of the swinging flashlight test to detect afferent pupillary defects. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[26]  Eiji Kimura,et al.  Pupillary correlates of light-evoked melanopsin activity in humans , 2008, Vision Research.

[27]  Krzysztof Palczewski,et al.  Impairment of the transient pupillary light reflex in Rpe65(-/-) mice and humans with leber congenital amaurosis. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  H. Wilhelm,et al.  Automatisierter Swinging-flashlight-Test bei Patienten mit Sehnervenerkrankungen , 2001 .

[29]  J. Shallo-Hoffmann,et al.  Comparing pupil function with visual function in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  Ava K. Bittner,et al.  The artificial silicon retina in retinitis pigmentosa patients (an American Ophthalmological Association thesis). , 2010, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[31]  Aki Kawasaki,et al.  Chromatic pupillometry in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[32]  M. Bach,et al.  ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update) , 2009, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[33]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The influence of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells on the spectral sensitivity and response dynamics of the human pupillary light reflex , 2010, Vision Research.