Duopoly price competition of WLAN service providers in presence of heterogeneous user demand

In the presence of several wireless local area network (WLAN) service providers, the users have to make a choice. The price charged and the congestion experienced by the users play an important role in making this choice. In this paper, we analyze the duopoly price competition between two WLAN service providers in the presence of four types of users. We prove that the distribution of heterogeneous user demand is governed by the Wardrop equilibrium. We also show the existence of the Nash equilibrium between competing WLAN service providers. It is further shown through analysis that the social welfare in Nash equilibrium is close to its maximal value. We find that compared to a strictly regulated monopoly, an unregulated WLAN duopoly market results in significant transfer of the surplus from service providers to users with negligible losses in efficiency.

[1]  Dusit Niyato,et al.  Competitive Spectrum Sharing and Pricing in Cognitive Wireless Mesh Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[2]  J. G. Wardrop,et al.  Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research , 1952 .

[3]  Hongqiang Zhai,et al.  How well can the IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN support quality of service? , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  J G Wardrop,et al.  CORRESPONDENCE. SOME THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC RESEARCH. , 1952 .

[5]  Hui Wang,et al.  Tussle between APs in a Pricing Game: A Location-Dependent Multi-AP Reverse Auction , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Yu-Kwong Kwok,et al.  Analysis of Duopoly Price Competition Between WLAN Providers , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[7]  Costas Courcoubetis,et al.  Pricing Communication Networks , 2003 .

[8]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .

[9]  M. Patriksson,et al.  Equilibrium characterizations of solutions to side constrained asymmetric traffic assignment models , 1995 .

[10]  Patrick Maillé,et al.  Analysis of Price Competition in a Slotted Resource Allocation Game , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[11]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[12]  Costas Courcoubetis,et al.  Pricing communication networks - economics, technology and modelling , 2003, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[13]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case Equilibria , 1999, STACS.