High dynamic range imaging concept-based signal enhancement method reduced the optical coherence tomography measurement variability.

PURPOSE To develop and test a novel signal enhancement method for optical coherence tomography (OCT) images based on the high dynamic range (HDR) imaging concept. METHODS Three virtual channels, which represent low, medium, and high signal components, were produced for each OCT signal dataset. The dynamic range of each signal component was normalized to the full gray scale range. Finally, the three components were recombined into one image using various weights. Fourteen eyes of 14 healthy volunteers were scanned multiple times using time-domain (TD)-OCT before and while preventing blinking in order to produce a wide variety of signal strength (SS) images on the same eye scanned on the same day. For each eye, a pair of scans with the highest and lowest SS with successful retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) segmentation was selected to test the signal enhancement effect. In addition, spectral-domain (SD)-OCT images with poor signal qualities were also processed. RESULTS Mean SS of good and poor quality scans were 9.0 ± 1.1 and 4.4 ± 0.9, respectively. TD-OCT RNFL thickness showed significant differences between good and poor quality scans on the same eye (mean difference 11.9 ± 6.0 μm, P < 0.0001, paired t-test), while there was no significant difference after signal enhancement (1.7 ± 6.2 μm, P = 0.33). However, HDR had weaker RNFL compensation effect on images with SS less than or equal to 4, while it maintained good compensation effect on images with SS greater than 4. Successful signal enhancement was also confirmed subjectively on SD-OCT images. CONCLUSION The HDR imaging successfully restored OCT signal and image quality and reduced RNFL thickness differences due to variable signal level to the level within the expected measurement variability. This technique can be applied to both TD- and SD-OCT images.

[1]  J G Fujimoto,et al.  A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  H. M. Salinas,et al.  Comparison of PDE-Based Nonlinear Diffusion Approaches for Image Enhancement and Denoising in Optical Coherence Tomography , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Effect of corneal drying on optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Guoguang Mu,et al.  Contrast enhancement of optical coherence tomography images using least squares fitting and histogram matching , 2007 .

[6]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images , 2002 .

[7]  Xu Wang,et al.  High dynamic range optical projection tomography (HDR-OPT). , 2012, Optics express.

[8]  Kostadinka Bizheva,et al.  Speckle noise reduction algorithm for optical coherence tomography based on interval type II fuzzy set. , 2007, Optics express.

[9]  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash,et al.  Inter-device variability of the Stratus optical coherence tomography. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  E A Swanson,et al.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography , 2008, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[12]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography images by use of a spatially adaptive wavelet filter. , 2004, Optics letters.

[13]  Ziqiang Wu,et al.  Image quality affects macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements on fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2011, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[14]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  Yijun Huang,et al.  Signal quality assessment of retinal optical coherence tomography images. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  J. Schuman,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 2000, Science.

[18]  James Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography contrast enhancement using spectroscopic analysis with spectral autocorrelation. , 2004, Optics express.

[19]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[20]  K. A. Townsend,et al.  Scan quality effect on glaucoma discrimination by glaucoma imaging devices , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  Oscar C. Au,et al.  Recent advances in high dynamic range imaging technology , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[22]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting , 2010 .

[23]  Daniel L. Lau,et al.  A Kalman-Filtering Approach to High Dynamic Range Imaging for Measurement Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: A new tool for glaucoma diagnosis , 1995, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[25]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[26]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  Aydogan Ozcan,et al.  Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography images using digital filtering. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.