Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study.

The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students' perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.

[1]  Michael Theall,et al.  Motivation from within : approaches for encouraging faculty and students to excel , 1999 .

[2]  D. Dilts,et al.  Assessing What Professors Do: An Introduction to Academic Performance Appraisal in Higher Education , 1994 .

[3]  C. Kleiner,et al.  Novice faculty: encountering expectations in academia. , 2001, The Journal of nursing education.

[4]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[5]  H. Melland,et al.  Teaching portfolios for faculty evaluation. , 1996, Nurse educator.

[6]  D. Ausubel.  The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. , 1963 .

[7]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[8]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Faculty Motivation: The Role of a Supportive Teaching Culture , 1999 .

[9]  D L Boland,et al.  A comprehensive approach to faculty evaluation. , 1988, The Journal of nursing education.

[10]  H. Marsh.  Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[11]  L. Salminen,et al.  Nurse educator competence: a study of Norwegian nurse educators' opinions of the importance and application of different nurse educator competence domains. , 2002, The Journal of nursing education.

[12]  B. Sheckley,et al.  Differences in classroom teaching preferences between traditional and adult BSN students. , 1997, The Journal of nursing education.

[13]  H. Marsh,et al.  Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. , 1997 .

[14]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act , 1978 .

[15]  W. McKeachie.  Student ratings: The validity of use. , 1997 .

[16]  S. Brookfield.  The Skillful Teacher: On Technique, Trust, and Responsiveness in the Classroom 2nd Edition , 1990 .

[17]  Robert E. Haskell,et al.  Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Student Evaluation of Faculty: Galloping Polls in the 21st Century. , 1997 .

[18]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[19]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[20]  W. McKeachie,et al.  Student ratings of instructors: A validity study. , 1958 .

[21]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .