Validation of the InCaSaQ, a new tool for the evaluation of patient satisfaction with clean intermittent self-catheterization.

[1]  P. Denys,et al.  Development and psychometric validation of the intermittent self-catheterization questionnaire. , 2012, Clinical therapeutics.

[2]  K. Kulich,et al.  A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence , 2012, Patient preference and adherence.

[3]  Fernando G Almeida,et al.  Determining the variables associated to clean intermittent self-catheterization adherence rate: one-year follow-up study. , 2011, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[4]  P. Di Benedetto.  Clean intermittent self-catheterization in neuro-urology. , 2011, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  I. Kurze,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a newly developed catheter (SpeediCath Compact Male) in men with spinal cord injury: residual urine and user evaluation , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[6]  M. Jousse,et al.  Pencil and paper test: a new tool to predict the ability of neurological patients to practice clean intermittent self-catheterization. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[7]  T. Kessler,et al.  Clean intermittent self‐catheterization: A burden for the patient? , 2009, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[8]  M. Ruutu,et al.  Patient experience with hydrophilic catheters used in clean intermittent catheterization. , 2008, Journal of pediatric urology.

[9]  M. Tvede,et al.  Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters. , 2005, European urology.

[10]  Steven Kirshblum,et al.  Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Mandy Fader,et al.  Managing Incontinence Using Technology, Devices, and Products: Directions for Research , 2004, Nursing research.

[12]  D. Newman,et al.  Managing Incontinence Using Technology, Devices, and Products , 2004 .

[13]  F. Maynard,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[14]  S. Silber,et al.  CLINICAL UROLOGY: Milestone in UrologyClean, Intermittent Self-Catheterization In The Treatment Of Urinary Tract Disease , 2002 .

[15]  A. Cottenden,et al.  Coated catheters for intermittent catheterization: smooth or sticky? , 2001, BJU international.

[16]  G. Pascoe,et al.  Evaluation of two coated catheters in intermittent self-catheterization. , 2001, British journal of nursing.

[17]  L. Baskin,et al.  Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[18]  P. Diehr,et al.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. , 1991, Controlled clinical trials.

[19]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[20]  P. Klarskov,et al.  Hydrophilic versus non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[21]  J S Kreutzer,et al.  Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  G. Scivoletto,et al.  Clean intermittent catheterization and prevention of renal disease in spinal cord injury patients , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[23]  K. Asayama,et al.  The functional limitations of tetraplegic hands for intermittent clean self-catheterisation , 1995, Paraplegia.