A comparison between analytical calculations of the shakedown load by the bipotential approach and step-by-step computations for elastoplastic materials with nonlinear kinematic hardening

Abstract The class of generalized standard materials is not relevant to model the nonassociative constitutive equations. The bipotential approach, based on a possible generalization of Fenchel’s inequality, allows the recovery of the flow rule normality in a weak form of an implicit relation. This defines the class of implicit standard materials. For such behaviours, this leads to a weak extension of the classical bound theorems of the shakedown analysis. In the present paper, we recall the relevant features of this theory. Considering an elastoplastic material with nonlinear kinematic hardening rule, we apply it to the problem of a sample in plane strain conditions under constant traction and alternating torsion in order to determine analytically the interaction curve bounding the shakedown domain. The aim of the paper is to prove the exactness of the solution for this example by comparing it to step-by-step computations of the elastoplastic response of the body under repeated cyclic loads of increasing level. A reliable criterion to stop the computations is proposed. The analytical and numerical solutions are compared and found to be closed one of each other. Moreover, the method allows uncovering an additional ‘2 cycle shakedown curve’ that could be useful for the shakedown design of structure.

[1]  D. Weichert,et al.  Influence of geometrical nonlinearities on the shakedown of damaged structures , 1998 .

[2]  Giulio Maier,et al.  Shakedown theory in perfect elastoplasticity with associated and nonassociated flow-laws: A finite element, linear programming approach , 1969 .

[3]  B. Nayroles,et al.  La notion de sanctuaire d'élasticité et d'adaptation des structures , 1993 .

[4]  Dieter Weichert,et al.  Inelastic Analysis of Structures under Variable Loads , 2000 .

[5]  Carlo Gavarini,et al.  Steel Orthotropic Plates under Alternate Loads , 1975 .

[6]  J. Chaboche,et al.  Mechanics of Solid Materials , 1990 .

[7]  John Brand Martin,et al.  Plasticity: Fundamentals and General Results , 1975 .

[8]  Ernst Melan,et al.  Zur Plastizität des räumlichen Kontinuums , 1938 .

[9]  G. De Saxce,et al.  Une généralisation de l'inégalité de Fenchel et ses applications aux lois constitutives , 1992 .

[10]  D G Moffat,et al.  Torispherical drumheads: A limit-pressure and shakedown investigation , 1971 .

[11]  G. E. Findlay,et al.  Elastic-Plastic Computations as a Basis for Design Charts for Torispherical Pressure Vessel Ends , 1970 .

[12]  Jean-Louis Chaboche,et al.  On some modifications of kinematic hardening to improve the description of ratchetting effects , 1991 .

[13]  Quoc Son Nguyen,et al.  On shakedown analysis in hardening plasticity , 2003 .

[14]  L. Bousshine,et al.  Softening in stress-strain curve for Drucker-Prager non-associated plasticity , 2001 .

[15]  E. Procter,et al.  Experimental investigation into the elastic/plastic behaviour of isolated nozzles in spherical shells. Part II. Shakedown and plastic analysis. , 1968 .

[16]  P. D. Chinh Plastic collapse of a circular plate under cyclic loads , 2003 .

[17]  Lahbib Bousshine,et al.  Limit analysis theorems for implicit standard materials: Application to the unilateral contact with dry friction and the non-associated flow rules in soils and rocks , 1998 .

[18]  W. T. Koiter General theorems for elastic plastic solids , 1960 .

[19]  W. Fenchel On Conjugate Convex Functions , 1949, Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

[20]  G. Saxcé,et al.  Plasticity with non-linear kinematic hardening: modelling and shakedown analysis by the bipotential approach , 2001 .

[21]  G. Borino Consistent shakedown theorems for materials with temperature dependent yield functions , 2000 .

[22]  Giulio Maier,et al.  Shakedown theorems for some classes of nonassociative hardening elastic-plastic material models , 1995 .

[23]  Ali Chaaba,et al.  A new approach to shakedown analysis for non-standard elastoplastic material by the bipotential , 2003 .

[24]  T. Charlton Progress in Solid Mechanics , 1962, Nature.

[25]  J. Moreau,et al.  La notion de sur-potentiel et les liaisons unilatérales en élastostatique , 1968 .

[26]  C. O. Frederick,et al.  A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect , 2007 .

[27]  Alberto Corigliano,et al.  Dynamic shakedown analysis and bounds for elastoplastic structures with nonassociative, internal variable constitutive laws , 1995 .

[28]  Dieter Weichert,et al.  Inelastic behaviour of structures under variable repeated loads : direct analysis methods , 2002 .