Justice, Trust, and Trustworthiness: A Longitudinal Analysis Integrating Three Theoretical Perspectives

Despite a significant amount of theoretical and empirical attention, the connection between justice and trust remains poorly understood. Our study utilized Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman’s (1995) distinction between trustworthiness (the ability, benevolence, and integrity of a trustee) and trust (a willingness to be vulnerable to the trustee) to clarify that connection. More specifically, we drew on a theoretical integration of social exchange theory, the relational model, and fairness heuristic theory to derive predictions about the relationships among justice, trustworthiness, and trust, with supervisors as the referent. A longitudinal field study stretching over two periods showed that informational justice was a significant predictor of subsequent trust perceptions, even when analyses controlled for prior levels of trust and trustworthiness. However, the relationship between justice and trustworthiness was shown to be reciprocal. Procedural and interpersonal justice were significant predictors of subsequent levels of benevolence and integrity, with integrity predicting subsequent levels of all four justice dimensions. We describe the theoretical implications of these results for future research in the justice and trust literatures.

[1]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[3]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[4]  Peter Y. Chen,et al.  Using Social Exchange Theory to Distinguish Procedural from Interactional Justice , 2002 .

[5]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[6]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[7]  G. Leventhal,et al.  The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations , 1976 .

[8]  S. Robinson.  Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[9]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice , 2003 .

[10]  D. Cremer,et al.  Perceived Support as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Justice and Trust , 2006 .

[11]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[12]  Zhen Xiong (George) Chen,et al.  Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model , 2002 .

[13]  A. Farrell,et al.  Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: strategies for examining group differences and reciprocal relationships. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[15]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[16]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[17]  H. Wilke,et al.  When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. , 1998 .

[18]  T. Tyler,et al.  Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. , 1996 .

[19]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[20]  G. Leventhal.  What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. , 1976 .

[21]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[22]  Roy J. Lewicki,et al.  What Is the Role of Trust in Organizational Justice , 2005 .

[23]  Robin Martin,et al.  From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  R. Bies.  Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness , 1986 .

[25]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. , 1993 .

[26]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[27]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[28]  P. Hanges,et al.  Survivor reactions to reorganization: antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[30]  R. Nyhan,et al.  Development and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Trust Inventory , 1997 .

[31]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[32]  Zinta S. Byrne,et al.  Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. , 2001 .

[33]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Measuring organizational communication. , 1974 .

[34]  Paul D. Johnson,et al.  Organizational Justice, Trustworthiness, and Trust: A Multifoci Examination , 2010 .

[35]  R. Mayer,et al.  IN MANAGEMENT , 2006 .

[36]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[37]  J. Colquitt.  On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  Kibeom Lee,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Eugene F. Srone-Romero.  Construct validity issues in organizational behavior research. , 2013 .

[40]  Rajnandini Pillai,et al.  ARE THE SCALES TIPPED IN FAVOR OF PROCEDURAL OR DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE? AN INVESTIGATION OF THE U.S., INDIA, GERMANY, AND HONG KONG (CHINA) , 2001 .

[41]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  R. Scholl,et al.  Referent Selection in Determining Equity Perceptions: Differential Effects on Behavioral and Attitudinal Outcomes. , 1987 .

[43]  R. Folger,et al.  Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions , 1989 .

[44]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Justice , 2005 .

[45]  T. Tyler.  The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. , 1989 .

[46]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. , 1993 .

[47]  G. Latham,et al.  How Can Training Be Used to Foster Organizational Justice , 2005 .

[48]  J. Brockner.  Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. , 1996 .

[49]  J. Greenberg,et al.  A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories , 1987 .

[50]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  Beaten Before Begun: The Role of Procedural Justice in Planning Change , 2002 .

[51]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  E. Lind.  Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. , 2001 .

[53]  M. Konovsky,et al.  Citizenship behavior and social exchange. , 1994, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[54]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[55]  T. Begley,et al.  Organizational level as a moderator of the relationship between justice perceptions and work-related reactions , 2006 .

[56]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Procedural Context and Culture: Variation in the Antecedents of Procedural Justice Judgments , 1997 .

[57]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future , 2007 .

[58]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[59]  Deborah E. Rupp,et al.  The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice , 2002 .

[60]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Fairness Perceptions and Trust as Mediators for Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Two-Sample Study , 1999 .

[62]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. , 1995 .

[64]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. , 1994 .

[65]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[66]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[67]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[68]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[69]  K. Bos.  Fairness heuristic theory : Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice , 2001 .

[70]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building , 2000 .

[71]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .