Binocularity and brain evolution in primates

Primates are distinguished by frontally directed, highly convergent orbits, which are associated with stereoscopic vision. Although stereoscopic vision requires specialized neural mechanisms, its implications for brain evolution are unknown. Using phylogenetic comparative analysis, I show that evolutionary increases among primate taxa in the degree of orbital convergence correlate with expansion of visual brain structures and, as a consequence, with the overall size of the brain. This pattern is found across the whole primate order and is also repeated within each of the two major primate subtaxa. The visual expansion associated with increased binocularity is specific to the parvocellular visual pathway, consistent with recent evidence implicating this pathway in fine-grained stereopsis. The results support the hypothesis that brain size evolution in primates was associated with visual specialization.

[1]  A. Dobbins,et al.  Distance modulation of neural activity in the visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[2]  Malcolm P. Young,,et al.  Analysis of Connectivity: Neural Systems in the Cerebral Cortex , 1994, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[3]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[4]  Michael E. Pereira,et al.  Primate life histories and socioecology , 2003 .

[5]  R. Barton Visual specialization and brain evolution in primates , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  M. Cartmill Rethinking primate origins. , 1974, Science.

[7]  R. J. Smith,et al.  Body mass in comparative primatology. , 1997, Journal of human evolution.

[8]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[9]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. , 1992, Science.

[10]  C. A. Dvorak,et al.  The Visual System in Vertebrates , 1977, Handbook of Sensory Physiology.

[11]  E. Martins The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Paul H. Harvey, Mark D. Pagel. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991), vii, + 239 Price $24.95 paperback , 1992 .

[12]  C. Ross,et al.  Evolution of activity patterns and chromatic vision in primates: morphometrics, genetics and cladistics. , 2001, Journal of human evolution.

[13]  C. Ross Allometric and functional influences on primate orbit orientation and the origins of the anthropoidea , 1995 .

[14]  C. V. van Schaik,et al.  Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[16]  A. Purvis A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  P. C. Lee Comparative primate socioecology , 1999 .

[18]  Robert W. Sussman,et al.  Primate origins and the evolution of angiosperms , 1991, American journal of primatology.

[19]  G. Westheimer The Ferrier Lecture, 1992. Seeing depth with two eyes: stereopsis , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[21]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.