Interpretation of transient electromagnetic soundings over three-dimensional structures for the central-loop configuration

Summary. An assessment is made of the bias of fitting constrained layeredearth models to transient electromagnetic data obtained over 3-D structures. In this assessment we use the central-loop configuration and show that accurate estimates of the depth of burial of 3-D structures can be obtained with layered-earth model fitting. However, layered-earth interpretations are not reliable for estimating depth extents and resistivities of 3-D structures. When layered earths are used for interpretation, it is advantageous in some cases to use data based on the magnetic field instead of the voltage. A magnetic-field definition of apparent resistivity, in contrast to a definition based on the voltage, eliminates apparent-resistivity overshoots and undershoots in the data. A resistivity undershoot in the data can produce an extraneous and misleading layer in an interpretation of a 3-D resistive structure. Due to 3-D effects, apparent-resistivity soundings (magnetic field and voltage) may rise so steeply at late times that it may not be possible to fit a sounding to a reasonable layered-earth model. Truncating such a sounding, over a buried conductor, allows for a reasonable layered-earth fit and an accurate estimate of the depth to the conductor. However, the resistivity of the conductor is overestimated. Measurements of the horizontal field in the central-loop configuration can map 3-D structures, provided the sensor is located accurately at the centre of the transmitting loop. Horizontal-field calculations show that the transients peak on the flanks of a 3-D structure, but are depressed over the structure's centre. Weak transient responses flanked by two large transient responses, which are opposite in sign, locate the structure. The sign reversal is caused by a corresponding reversal in the currents that are channelled through or deflected away from conductive or resistive structures, respectively.

[1]  H. A. Luther,et al.  Applied numerical methods , 1969 .

[2]  James R. Wait,et al.  The Magnetic Dipole Over the Horizontally Stratified Earth , 1951 .

[3]  Paul Raab,et al.  Desktop computer processing of coincident and central loop time domain electromagnetic data , 1983 .

[4]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications , 1987 .

[5]  Walter L. Anderson,et al.  Computer program; numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders O and 1 by adaptive digital filtering , 1979 .

[6]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  An evaluation of electromagnetic methods in the presence of geologic noise , 1987 .

[7]  Yonathan Bard,et al.  Nonlinear parameter estimation , 1974 .

[8]  Brian R. Spies,et al.  The use and misuse of apparent resistivity in electromagnetic methods , 1986 .

[9]  Frank C. Frischknecht,et al.  Time‐domain electromagnetic soundings at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada , 1984 .

[10]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Two-dimensional transient electromagnetic responses , 1985 .

[11]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth , 1986 .

[12]  John E. Dennis,et al.  An Adaptive Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm , 1977, TOMS.

[13]  Walter L. Anderson,et al.  Improved digital filters for evaluating Fourier and Hankel transform integrals , 1975 .

[14]  Lourenildo W. B. Leite,et al.  Ridge regression applied to the inversion of two-dimensional aeromagnetic anomalies , 1985 .

[15]  Joseph Robert Inman,et al.  RESISTIVITY INVERSION WITH RIDGE REGRESSION , 1975 .

[16]  M. Nabighian.  Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space; an approximate representation , 1979 .

[17]  G. Newman,et al.  An album of three-dimensional transient electromagnetic responses for the central-induction loop configuration , 1985 .

[18]  K. Vozoff,et al.  The joint use of coincident loop transient electromagnetic and Schlumberger sounding to resolve layered structures , 1985 .

[19]  Misac N. Nabighian,et al.  Time-domain electromagnetic methods of exploration; foreword and introduction , 1984 .

[20]  M. Stewart,et al.  Transient Electromagnetic Sounding for Groundwater , 1986 .

[21]  Art Raiche,et al.  Comparison of apparent resistivity functions for transient electromagnetic methods , 1983 .

[22]  H. Frank Morrison,et al.  ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ABOUT A LOOP SOURCE OF CURRENT , 1970 .

[23]  G. Hoversten,et al.  Transient fields of a current loop source above a layered earth , 1982 .

[24]  T. Brubaker,et al.  Nonlinear Parameter Estimation , 1979 .

[25]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Integral equation solution for the transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a conductive half-space , 1985 .

[26]  Stanley H. Ward,et al.  FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION , 1971 .