Beyond illusion of control: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of gambling in the context of information technology

The relationship between cognitive biases, such as illusion of control and problem gambling has been demonstrated in multiple studies. Recent explorative research has proposed that many individuals perceive that via application of information technology (IT), there is scope to influence gambling outcomes, to the extent of becoming consistently profitable. The objective of this study was to explore how the proposed concept of profitable, controlled gambling via IT is affecting how individuals understand and execute their gambling behaviour. This study used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and aimed to produce a detailed understanding of how the concept affects gambling motivation and experiences of seven adult, frequent gamblers. The IPA produced three super-ordinate themes accounting for the impact of IT on their gambling experiences: maturational developments, ‘I’ve had my own epiphany’ and ‘There are much more lucrative and secure ways to make money with less effort’. Through evaluation of the emergent themes, it is proposed that the acknowledgement of the possibility of gambling in a controlled and profitable process via IT applications leads participants to an increased awareness of their gambling motivations and objectives. Essentially, participants become aware that their primary gambling motivation is not profit accumulation but rather entertainment. The implications of the emergent themes are discussed with particular reference to their relationship to responsible, and problem, gambling behaviour.

[1]  Miguel A. Vadillo,et al.  Illusion of Control , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[2]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  What Differentiates Professional Poker Players from Recreational Poker Players? A Qualitative Interview Study , 2012, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[3]  A. Parke,et al.  Poker Gambling Virtual Communities: The Use of Computer-Mediated Communication to Develop Cognitive Poker Gambling Skills , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[4]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  Illusion of control by proxy: placing one's fate in the hands of another. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[5]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative phenomenological analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Griffiths,et al.  British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007 , 2007 .

[7]  T. Wykes,et al.  More than just a place to talk: young people's experiences of group psychological therapy as an early intervention for auditory hallucinations. , 2007, Psychology and psychotherapy.

[8]  Joseph K. Goodman,et al.  Special Random Numbers: Beyond the Illusion of Control , 2006 .

[9]  K. Ohtsuka,et al.  Problem Gambling: An Exploration of the Role of Global Personal Hopefulness, Short-term Gambling Hope, and Illusion of Control Beliefs , 2005 .

[10]  T. Oei,et al.  Pathological gambling. A comprehensive review. , 2002, Clinical psychology review.

[11]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. , 2002, Addiction.

[12]  R. Ladouceur,et al.  Understanding and Treating the Pathological Gambler , 2002 .

[13]  R. Shaw Why use interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology? , 2001, Health Psychology Update.

[14]  Paul H. Delfabbro,et al.  Predictors of Irrational Thinking in Regular Slot Machine Gamblers , 2000, The Journal of psychology.

[15]  David Sklansky,et al.  Hold'Em Poker for Advanced Players , 1999 .

[16]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis , 1998 .

[17]  V. Benassi,et al.  Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. , 1996 .

[18]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. , 1994 .

[19]  M. Dickerson Internal and external determinants of persistent gambling: Problems in generalising from one form of gambling to another , 1993, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[20]  Mark Griffiths,et al.  Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics , 1993, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[21]  N. Tarrier,et al.  Towards a Cognitive-Behavioural Theory of Problem Gambling , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[22]  Michael B. Walker,et al.  Irrational thinking among slot machine players , 1992, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[23]  W. Brink Paradoxes of gambling behaviour , 1992 .

[24]  R. Ladouceur,et al.  Evaluation of Motivation among Video-Poker Players , 1990 .

[25]  M. Mayrand,et al.  Evaluation of the “Illusion of Control”: Type of Feedback, Outcome Sequence, and Number of Trials Among Regular and Occasional Gamblers , 1984 .

[26]  C. Willig Introducing qualitative research in psychology : adventures in theory and method , 2008 .

[27]  A Parke,et al.  An explorative investigation of the effects of information technology on gambling and gambling-related behaviours. , 2007 .

[28]  G. Hodgkinson The cognitive perspective , 2007 .

[29]  S. Moore,et al.  Gambling Activities of Young Australians: Developing a Model of Behaviour , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[30]  Jonathan A. Smith Validity and qualitative psychology , 2003 .

[31]  Jörg Petry,et al.  Understanding and Treating the Pathological Gambler , 2003 .

[32]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[33]  P. Salkovskis Trends in Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies. , 1996 .

[34]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .