Industry-wide IS Standardization as Collective Action : The Case of the US Residential Mortgage Industry

and the Telematica Instituut in the Netherlands. He has published five books and numerous articles in journals such as Gabe Minton is Vice President of Industry Technology at the Mortgage Bankers Association, where he is responsible for overseeing MBA's leadership role in the establishment of technology standards for the residential real estate finance industry. He was formerly the vice president of standards and alliances with Ultraprise Corporation and has more than 10 years of experience working with and creating software systems and standards, We gratefully acknowledge the support received from the Mortgage Bankers Association of America, the Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization, and the unnamed interviewees who provided their insights. Abstract Vertical information systems (VIS) standards are technical specifications designed to promote coordination among the organizations within (or across) vertical industry sectors. Examples include the bar code, electronic data interchange (EDI) standards, and RosettaNet business process standards in the electronics industry. This contribution examines VIS standardization through the lens of collective action theory, applied in the literature to IT product standardization, but not yet to VIS standardization, which is led by heterogeneous groups of user organizations rather than by IT vendors. Though an intensive case analysis of VIS standardization in the US residential mortgage industry, VIS standardization success is shown to be as problematic as IT product standardization success, but for different reasons. VIS standardization involves two linked collective action dilemmas—standards development and standards diffusion—with different characteristics, such that a solution to the first may fail to resolve the second. Whereas prior theoretical and empirical research shows that IT product standardization efforts tend to splinter into rival factions that compete through standards wars in the marketplace, successful VIS standards consortia must encompass heterogeneous groups of user organizations and IT vendors without fragmenting. Some tactics successfully used to solve the collective action dilemma of VIS standardization (e.g., governance mechanisms and policies about intellectual property protection) are also used by IT product standardization efforts, but some are different, and successful VIS standardization requires a package of solutions tailored to fit and jointly resolve the specific dilemmas of particular VIS standards initiatives.

[1]  Dominique Foray Users, standards and the economics of coalitions and committees , 1994 .

[2]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure, The Case of GSM , 2002 .

[3]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[4]  Michael L. Barnett HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY STRATEGY MATTER? ORGANIZATIONAL FIELD DYNAMICS AND THE INTENSITY OF COOPERATION AMONG RIVALS. , 2004 .

[5]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Collective Strategy: Social Ecology of Organizational Environments. , 1983 .

[6]  Victor Stango The Economics of Standards Wars , 2004 .

[7]  Leonard A. Steverson Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005 .

[8]  Robin Williams,et al.  The dynamics of edi standards development , 1995 .

[9]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary Provision Versus Selective Incentives , 1993 .

[10]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[11]  A. Picot,et al.  Information, Organization and Management: Expanding Markets and Corporate Boundaries , 1997 .

[12]  R. Hawkins,et al.  The rise of consortia in the information and communication technology industries: emerging implications for policy , 1999 .

[13]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  IT STANDARDS CHOICES AND INDUSTRY STRUCTURE OUTCOMES : THE CASE OF THE UNITED STATES HOME MORTGAGE INDUSTRY , 2005 .

[14]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Looking to the Internet for models of governance , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  S. Besen THE EUROPEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS INSTITUTE: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS , 1990 .

[16]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[17]  Kai Reimers,et al.  Antecedents of a Transaction Cost Theory of Vertical IS Standardization Processes , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[18]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Planning for IS Related Industry Transformation: The Case of the 3daycar , 2001, ECIS.

[19]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[20]  Martin Weiss,et al.  Consortia in the Standards Development Process , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Bob Hills Common Message Standards for Electronic Commerce in Wholesale Financial Markets , 2000 .

[22]  Shane M. Greenstein Invisible Hands and Visible Advisors: An Economic Interpretation of Standardization , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Value of Formative Investment in Organizational Federations , 2001 .

[25]  M. Katz,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Competition , 1990 .

[26]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Standard Making: a Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems Misq Special Issue Workshop the Adoption and Diffusion of Interorganizational System Standards and Process Innovations , 2022 .

[27]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Paradigm Shifts - E-Business and Business/Systems Integration , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Andrew Updegrove,et al.  Forming, funding, and operating standard-setting consortia , 1993, IEEE Micro.

[29]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Arguments for weaker intellectual property protection in network industries , 1995, STAN.

[30]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Coalition Formation in Standard-Setting Alliances , 1995 .

[31]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Computerized Loan Origination Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis , 1994, MIS Q..

[33]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[34]  Raluca Bunduchi,et al.  Shaping IT Standardization in the Automotive Industry - The Role of Power in Driving Portal Standardization , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[35]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  The Evolution of Vertical IS Standards : Electronic Interchange Standards in the US Home Mortgage Industry , 2004 .

[36]  Henk J. de Vries,et al.  Standardization: A Business Approach to the Role of National Standardization Organizations , 1999 .

[37]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[38]  C. Kindleberger Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods , 1983 .

[39]  Robert Van Order,et al.  The U.S. Mortgage Market: A Model of Dueling Charters , 2000 .

[40]  C. Cargill Information technology standardization: Theory, process, and organizations , 1989 .

[41]  James B. Wade Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market , 1995 .

[42]  Roman Beck,et al.  Some Economics of Vertical Standards: Integrating SMEs in EDI Supply Chains , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[43]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[44]  J. West,et al.  What are Open Standards? Implications for Adoption, Competition and Policy , 2004 .

[45]  Pamela Oliver,et al.  Whatever Happened to Critical Mass Theory? A Retrospective and Assessment* , 2001 .

[46]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..