Comparing the Linguistic Complexity in Receptive and Productive Modes

Several studies have investigated linguistic complexity as an index of proficiency and across genres. However, very little research has been conducted in determining the difference between the linguistic complexity during receptive and productive modes. This study, therefore, attempts to fill in such a gap by providing evidence on whether the linguistic complexity that pupils can process during receptive mode is higher than what they can utilize during productive mode. Specifically, this study sought to determine the linguistic complexity level of learners’ written narratives (i.e. productive mode) and reading passages most comprehensible to them (MCRPs) (i.e. receptive mode) and whether all linguistic complexity indices in MCRPs are higher than the linguistic complexity indices in written narratives. To address these objectives, this study used a narrative film to elicit the written narratives from the participants via story reconstruction. Eight graded narrative reading passages were also used to determine the most comprehensible reading passage via multiple-choice test. Using a microstructure analysis tool, the findings suggest that while the overall receptive linguistic complexity of Grades 2, 4, and 6 pupils is higher than their productive linguistic complexity, interestingly, not all indices of linguistic complexity are higher during productive mode. The implications of these findings for classroom teaching are considered more particularly in the selection of reading materials and the aspect of linguistic complexity that needs to be adjusted to facilitate comprehension. This paper, then, concludes with some research directions that would shed light on the receptive-productive dimensions of linguistic complexity.

[1]  J. Grice Computing and evaluating factor scores , 2001 .

[2]  D. McNamara,et al.  A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts , 2007 .

[3]  Philip M. McCarthy,et al.  Linguistic Features of Writing Quality , 2010 .

[4]  Bonnie B. Armbruster Schema Theory and the Design of Content-Area Textbooks , 1986 .

[5]  Omer Silva,et al.  Guide to Narrative Language: Procedures for Assessment , 1999 .

[6]  Helen de Hoop,et al.  Children's Optimal Interpretations of Indefinite Subjects and Objects , 2006 .

[7]  Peter J. M. Groot,et al.  Computer Assisted Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition , 2000 .

[8]  Lesley Mandel Morrow Analysis of Syntax of Six-, Seven-, and Eight-Year-Old Children. , 1978 .

[9]  Marion Crowhurst,et al.  Syntactic Complexity and Writing Quality: A Review. , 1983 .

[10]  C. Houck,et al.  Written Expression of Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  Virginie Pignot-Shahov Measuring L2 Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge , 2012 .

[12]  Esther Geva,et al.  Use of Conjunctions in Expository Texts by Skilled and Less Skilled Readers , 1985 .

[13]  R. Siegler,et al.  The rebirth of children's learning. , 2000, Child development.

[14]  Xiaofei Lu A Corpus-Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College-Level ESL Writers' Language Development , 2011 .

[15]  Barbara Eckhoff,et al.  How Reading Affects Children's Writing. , 1983 .

[16]  Allyssa McCabe,et al.  Developing narrative structure. , 1991 .

[17]  K. W. Hunt Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. , 1970, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[18]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  Attainment of Syntactic and Morphological Accuracy by Advanced Language Learners , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[19]  L. D. Briggs,et al.  Linguistic Development of Children and the Syntax of Basals , 1986 .

[20]  Sandra Ishikawa,et al.  Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing , 1995 .

[21]  Hooi San Phoon,et al.  Oral Vocabulary as a Predictor of English Language Proficiency among Malaysian Chinese Preschool Children , 2014 .

[22]  Shannon Hall-Mills,et al.  Linguistic feature development in elementary writing: Analysis of microstructure and macrostructure features in a narrative and an expository genre , 2009 .

[23]  T. McNamara,et al.  Assessed Levels of Second Language Speaking Proficiency: How Distinct? , 2007 .

[24]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Modelling Learning Difficulty and Second Language Proficiency: The Differential Contributions of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge , 2006 .

[25]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) , 2000 .

[26]  Alex Housen,et al.  Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition , 2009 .

[27]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Background Knowledge, Linguistic Complexity, and Second-Language Reading Comprehension , 1998 .

[28]  T. McNamara,et al.  Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) and repetition priming. , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Marianne Celce-Murcia,et al.  Discourse and Context in Language Teaching: A Guide for Language Teachers , 2000 .

[30]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Form‐Focused Instruction: Isolated or Integrated? , 2008 .

[31]  Birgit Henriksen,et al.  THREE DIMENSIONS OF VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[32]  Manoochehr Jafarigohar,et al.  Text Difficulty Effect on Metacognitive Reading Strategy Use among EFL Learners , 2014 .

[33]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing , 2002 .

[34]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  Adjusting Expectations: The Study of Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition , 2009 .

[35]  Sarita L Eisenberg,et al.  The index of narrative microstructure: a clinical tool for analyzing school-age children's narrative performances. , 2006, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[36]  Michael F. Graves,et al.  Teaching Reading in the 21st Century , 1998 .

[37]  Christine Pearson Casanave,et al.  Language development in students' journals , 1994 .

[38]  R. Ellis The Differential Effects of Three Types of Task Planning on the Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy in L2 Oral Production , 2009 .

[39]  Eli Hinkel,et al.  Simplicity Without Elegance: Features of Sentences in L1 and L2 Academic Texts , 2003 .

[40]  Brian Drier,et al.  Gains in students'lexical and syntactic productive written ability through concordance evidence of genre‑ specific KWIC items , 2002 .

[41]  Yoko Futagi,et al.  Generating Automated Text Complexity Classifications That Are Aligned with Targeted Text Complexity Standards. Research Report. ETS RR-10-28. , 2010 .

[42]  T. C. Cooper,et al.  Measuring Written Syntactic Patterns of Second Language Learners of German , 1976 .

[43]  D. Larsen-Freeman,et al.  The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course , 1983 .

[44]  Katharine Perera,et al.  Children's writing and reading: Analysing classroom language , 1984 .

[45]  Thao Lê,et al.  Lexical density and readability: A case study of English Textbooks , 2013 .

[46]  J. Alderson Assessing Reading: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[47]  S. Webb The Effects of Repetition on Vocabulary Knowledge , 2007 .

[48]  L. Ortega Syntactic Complexity Measures and Their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-Level L2 Writing. , 2003 .

[49]  Naoko Taguchi,et al.  What Linguistic Features Are Indicative of Writing Quality? A Case of Argumentative Essays in a College Composition Program , 2013 .

[50]  Shunji Inagaki,et al.  Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity , 1998 .