In Search of Gender Neutrality: Is Singular They a Cognitively Efficient Substitute for Generic He?

With increasing frequency, writers and speakers are ignoring grammatical proscription and using the plural pronoun they to refer to singular antecedents. This change may, in part, be motivated by efforts to make language more gender inclusive. In the current study, two reading-time experiments demonstrated that singular they is a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he or she, particularly when the antecedent is nonreferential. In such instances, clauses containing they were read (a) much more quickly than clauses containing a gendered pronoun that went against the gender stereotype of the antecedent, and (b) just as quickly as clauses containing a gendered pronoun that matched the stereotype of the antecedent. However, with referential antecedents, for which the gender was presumably known, clauses containing singular they were not read as quickly as clauses containing a gendered pronoun that matched the antecedent's stereotypic gender.

[1]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  In Search of Complete Comprehension: Getting "Minimalists" to Work. , 1994, Discourse processes.

[2]  J. Stern.  Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[3]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. , 1977 .

[4]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  On the Comprehension and Production of Pronouns , 1979 .

[5]  Janice Moulton,et al.  Sex bias in language use: "Neutral" pronouns that aren't. , 1978 .

[6]  Teaching inclusive generic pronoun usage: The effectiveness of an authority innovation‐decision approach versus an optional innovation‐decision approach , 1982 .

[7]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  On the goals, principles, and procedures for prescriptive grammar: Singular they , 1980, Language in Society.

[8]  井口 道生.  W. Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White: The Elements of Style, MacMillan Co,, New York, 1959, 71頁, 13×21cm, $2.95. Paperback 11×17cm, $0.95 , 1971 .

[9]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Anaphoric reference to instances, instantiated and non-instantiated categories: A reading time study , 1981 .

[10]  Jeanette M. Silveira.  Generic masculine words and thinking , 1980 .

[11]  Ann Bodine,et al.  Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’ , 1975, Language in Society.

[12]  F. Khosroshahi.  Penguins don't care, but women do: A social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem , 1989, Language in society.

[13]  Miriam Watkins Meyers,et al.  Current Generic Pronoun Usage: An Empirical Study , 1990 .

[14]  W. Martyna,et al.  What Does ‘He’ Mean?Use of the Generic Masculine , 1978 .

[15]  Alan Garnham.  Effects of Specificity on the Interpretation of Anaphoric Noun Phrases , 1984 .

[16]  Ann M. Reed,et al.  The Politics of Grammar Handbooks: Generic "He" and Singular "They.". , 1993 .

[17]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Fixation Time on Anaphoric Pronouns Decreases With Congruity of Reference , 1984 .

[18]  Can "she" and "he" coexist? , 1978 .

[19]  A. Nilsen.  Winning the Great He/She Battle , 1984 .