Can we afford storage? A dynamic net energy analysis of renewable electricity generation supported by energy storage

Global wind power and photovoltaic (PV) installed capacities are growing at very high rates (20% per year and 60% per year, respectively). These technologies require large, ‘up-front’ energetic investments. Conceptually, as these industries grow, some proportion of their electrical output is ‘re-invested’ to support manufacture and deployment of new generation capacity. As variable and intermittent, renewable generation capacity increases grid penetration, electrical energy storage will become an ever more important load-balancing technology. These storage technologies are currently expensive and energy intensive to deploy. We explore the impact on net energy production when wind and PV must ‘pay’ the energetic cost of storage deployment. We present the net energy trajectory of these two industries (wind and PV), disaggregated into eight distinct technologies—wind: on-shore and off-shore; PV: single-crystal (sc-), multi-crystalline (mc-), amorphous (a-) and ribbon silicon (Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), and copper indium gallium (di)selenide (CIGS). The results show that both on-shore and off-shore wind can support the deployment of a very large amount of storage, over 300 hours of geologic storage in the case of on-shore wind. On the other hand, solar PV, which is already energetically expensive compared to wind power, can only ‘afford’ about 24 hours of storage before the industry operates at an energy deficit. The analysis highlights the societal benefits of electricity generation–storage combinations with low energetic costs.

[1]  Jerry M. Guo,et al.  Tigers in trouble: Year of the tiger , 2007, Nature.

[2]  José L. Bernal-Agustín,et al.  Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage , 2011 .

[3]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[4]  Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.  Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems , 2010 .

[5]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications , 2002 .

[6]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in electric power systems utilizing energy storage and other enabling technologies , 2007 .

[7]  Geoffrey C. Ward,et al.  The year of the tiger , 1998 .

[8]  Farrokh Albuyeh,et al.  Grid of the future , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[9]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Role of Energy Storage with Renewable Electricity Generation , 2010 .

[10]  Sally M. Benson,et al.  The energetic implications of curtailing versus storing solar- and wind-generated electricity , 2013 .

[11]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future , 2012, Nature.

[12]  Sally M. Benson,et al.  On the importance of reducing the energetic and material demands of electrical energy storage , 2013 .

[13]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geophysical limits to global wind power , 2012 .

[14]  G. Destouni,et al.  Renewable Energy , 2010, AMBIO.

[15]  David J. C. MacKay Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air , 2008 .

[16]  Yoshishige Kemmoku,et al.  Life cycle CO2 emissions of a photovoltaic/wind/diesel generating system , 2000 .

[17]  W. Patterson Energy policy , 1978, Nature.

[18]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[19]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.