Root Cause Analysis: A Framework for Tool Selection

This article provides a framework for analyzing the performance of three popular root cause analysis tools: the cause-and-effect diagram, the interrelationship diagram, and the current reality tree. The literature confirmed that these tools have the capacity to find root causes with varying degrees of accuracy and quality. The literature, however, lacks a means for selecting the appropriate root cause analysis tool based upon objective performance criteria. Some of the important performance characteristics of root cause analysis tools include the ability to find root causes, causal interdependencies, factor relationships, and cause categories. Root cause analysis tools must also promote focus, stimulate discussion, be readable when complete, and have mechanisms for evaluating the integrity of group findings. This analysis found that each tool has advantages and disadvantages, with varying levels of causal yield and selected causal factor integrity. This framework provides decision makers with the knowledge of root cause analysis performance characteristics so they can better understand the underlying assumptions of a recommended solution.

[1]  Eli Schragenheim Management Dilemmas: The Theory of Constraints Approach to Problem Identification and Solutions , 1998 .

[2]  Anthony Mark Doggett,et al.  A Statistical Comparison of Three Root Cause Analysis Tools , 2004 .

[3]  Eliyahu M. Goldratt,et al.  It's Not Luck , 1994 .

[4]  Oded Cohen,et al.  Deming and Goldratt : the theory of constraints and the system of profound knowledge : the decalogue , 1999 .

[5]  Bjørn Andersen,et al.  Root Cause Analysis: Simplified Tools and Techniques , 1999 .

[6]  James F. Cox,et al.  The Constraints Management Handbook , 1996 .

[7]  Debra Smith,et al.  The Measurement Nightmare: How the Theory of Constraints Can Resolve Conflicting Strategies, Policies, and Measures , 1999 .

[8]  水野 滋,et al.  Management for quality improvement : the seven new QC tools , 1988 .

[9]  Lisa J. Scheinkopf,et al.  Thinking for a Change: Putting the Toc Thinking Processes to Use , 1999 .

[10]  Keki R. Bhote,et al.  World Class Quality: Design of Experiments Made Easier, More Cost Effective Than Spc , 1988 .

[11]  Karen A. Pitts A Guide to Graphical Problem Solving Processes , 1990 .

[12]  J. Wayne Patterson,et al.  What should be changed , 2002 .

[13]  Eliyahu M. Goldratt,et al.  What is this thing called theory of constraints and how should it be implemented , 1990 .

[14]  Bob Sproull,et al.  Process Problem Solving: A Guide for Maintenance and Operations Teams , 2001 .

[15]  Michael Brassard,et al.  The Memory Jogger Plus + Featuring the Seven Management and Planning Tools , 1996 .