Nanoparticle fluidization and Geldart's classification

The behaviour of gas-particle interaction in a fluidized bed depends strongly on the size of the particles being fluidized. Fluidization characteristics of macro-sized particles, from several tens of microns to several millimetres, are well described by the Geldart [1973. Types of gas fluidization, Powder Technology 7, 285] classification. There is evidence that fluidization characteristics of nano-sized particles may be analysed by analogies to those of macro-sized particles. The aim of this paper is to look at whether the mechanism resulting in cohesive behaviour for macro-sized particles may be extended to nano-sized particles. Degussa Aerosil R974 powder, with a primary particle size of 12 nm, was fluidized using nitrogen in a cylindrical vessel, 50-mm-id and 900 mm in height. Characteristics of incipient fluidization are analysed in relation to variations in the initial packed bed conditions. Bed collapse experiments were performed and the results are used for assessing fluidization characteristics of the particles. It was found that nano-sized particles possess characteristics of both Group A and Group C of Geldart classification. Analysis shows that fluidization characteristics of nano-sized particles may be bridged to those of macro-sized particles through particle aggregation.

[1]  J. Visser.  On Hamaker constants: A comparison between Hamaker constants and Lifshitz-van der Waals constants , 1972 .

[2]  Wei Fei,et al.  Fluidization and agglomerate structure of SiO2 nanoparticles , 2002 .

[3]  Antonio Ramos,et al.  The tensile strength of cohesive powders and its relationship to consolidation, free volume and cohesivity , 1998 .

[4]  O. Levenspiel,et al.  Vibrating beds of fine particles: Estimation of interparticle forces from expansion and pressure drop experiments , 1992 .

[5]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Prediction of fluidized bed behaviour in the presence of liquid bridges , 2001 .

[6]  Leon R. Glicksman,et al.  Scaling relationships for fluidized beds , 1984 .

[7]  Akira Nonaka,et al.  A new similarity rule for fluidized bed scale‐up , 1986 .

[8]  Alan W. Weimer,et al.  Aggregation behavior of nanoparticles in fluidized beds , 2005 .

[9]  Antonio Ramos,et al.  Flow Regimes in Fine Cohesive Powders , 1999 .

[10]  Chao Zhu,et al.  Gas fluidization characteristics of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2005 .

[11]  Julio Soria,et al.  Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part I—determination of aggregate size and shape , 2006 .

[12]  D. Geldart.  Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[13]  C. Xu,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study on the agglomeration arising from fluidization of cohesive particles—effects of mechanical vibration , 2005 .

[14]  Roland Clift,et al.  The effect of thin liquid layers on fluidisation characteristics , 1984 .

[15]  Leon R. Glicksman,et al.  Simplified scaling relationships for fluidized beds , 1993 .

[16]  A. J. Forsyth,et al.  Use of a magnetic fluidized bed in studying Geldart Group B to A transition , 2001 .

[17]  Derek Geldart,et al.  Fluidization of cohesive powders , 1984 .

[18]  Kurt Liffman,et al.  Onset of cohesive behaviour in gas fluidized beds: a numerical study using DEM simulation , 2001 .

[19]  O. Molerus,et al.  Interpretation of Geldart's type A, B, C and D powders by taking into account interparticle cohesion forces , 1982 .

[20]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Aerated vibrofluidization of silica nanoparticles , 2004 .

[21]  Julio Soria,et al.  Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part II—mechanistic analysis of nanoparticle aggregation , 2006 .

[22]  L. R. Glicksman,et al.  Scaling relationship for fluidized beds , 1984 .

[23]  O. Molerus,et al.  Theory of yield of cohesive powders , 1975 .