Adult Readers’ Sensitivity to Phrase Boundaries in Texts

AbstractPrevious research has suggested that phrasing or chunking texts during reading is an important aspect of fluent reading. Past studies have indicated that good and poor elementary readers differ in their ability to phrase texts. In the present study, good and poor college-aged readers were asked to identify phrase boundaries in two texts varying in difficulty. Results of the study indicate an interaction between reading ability and text difficulty. In the easier text, both good and poor readers performed at the same level. With the more difficult text, the performance of the poor readers diminished significantly, whereas the good readers’ performance remained at the same level as the easier text. Further analysis indicated that errors in phrasing were due more to a relative insensitivity rather than to too great a sensitivity to phrase boundaries. Results of the study are discussed within the framework of word difficulty in the two texts.

[1]  Perceptual span training and reading achievement of school children. , 1966 .

[2]  Roberta Michnick Golinkoff,et al.  A Comparison of Reading Comprehension Processes in Good and Poor Comprehenders. , 1975 .

[3]  Marie M. Clay,et al.  Juncture, pitch, and stress as reading behavior variables , 1971 .

[4]  Kathleen C. Stevens Chunking Material as an Aid to Reading Comprehension. , 1981 .

[5]  Peter A. Schreiber,et al.  On the Acquisition of Reading Fluency , 1980 .

[6]  Barry J. Schwartz,et al.  Typographical Cues That Facilitate Comprehension. , 1979 .

[7]  Glenn M. Kleiman,et al.  Prosody and children's parsing of sentences , 1979 .

[8]  W. Brozo The Beneficial Effect of Chunking on Good Readers' Comprehension of Expository Prose. , 1983 .

[9]  David S. Weiss The effects of text segmentation on children's reading comprehension∗ , 1983 .

[10]  Jana M. Mason,et al.  Facilitating Reading Comprehension through Text Structure Manipulation. , 1979 .

[11]  Sara S. Rode Development of Phrase and Clause Boundary Reading in Children. , 1974 .

[12]  George E. Mason,et al.  Computer-Chunked and Traditional Text. , 1983 .

[13]  Paul T. Sindelar,et al.  The Effects of Segmenting Written Discourse on the Reading Comprehension of Low- and High-Performance Readers. , 1983 .

[14]  Richard L. Allington,et al.  Fluency: The neglected reading goal. , 1983 .

[15]  A. Harris,et al.  How to increase reading ability , 1940 .

[16]  Ronald E. Johnson Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units. , 1970 .

[17]  W. Cromer The difference model: a new explanation for some reading difficulties. , 1970, Journal of educational psychology.

[18]  R. P. Carver,et al.  The Effect of Practice through Repeated Reading on Gain in Reading Ability Using a Computer-Based Instructional System. , 1981 .

[19]  Nancy E. Taylor,et al.  The Effects of Text Manipulation and Multiple Reading Strategies on the Reading Performance of Good and Poor Readers. , 1985 .