Does Self-Serving Leadership Hinder Team Creativity? A Moderated Dual-Path Model

Self-serving leadership is a form of unethical leadership behavior that has destructive effect on its targets and the overall organization. Adopting a social cognition perspective, this study expands our knowledge of its adverse effect and the way to mitigate the effect. Integrating two sub-theories of social cognition (social information processing and social learning), we propose a theoretical model wherein self-serving leadership hinders team creativity through psychological safety as well as knowledge hiding, with task interdependence acting as a contextual condition. Results from a sample of 107 R&D teams revealed that self-serving leadership not only reduced team psychological safety, but also induced team knowledge hiding, both of which ultimately affected team creativity. The presence of high task interdependence buffered the destructive effect of self-serving leadership on team creativity via team psychological safety as well as the indirect effect via knowledge hiding.

[1]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection , 2014 .

[2]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[3]  R. Brislin The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[4]  Jeou-Shyan Horng,et al.  Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance , 2009 .

[5]  Miha Škerlavaj,et al.  Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective , 2013 .

[6]  Xiaoming Tian,et al.  Can self‐sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion , 2016 .

[7]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  J. B. Fuller,et al.  Bridge building within the province of proactivity , 2012 .

[9]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[10]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[11]  Bor-Shiuan Cheng,et al.  Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions , 2008 .

[12]  A. Somech The Effects of Leadership Style and Team Process on Performance and Innovation in Functionally Heterogeneous Teams , 2006 .

[13]  Yu-hsiang Hou,et al.  The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination , 2016 .

[14]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Top management support and IS implementation: further support for the moderating role of task interdependence , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Leader‐member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance , 2006 .

[17]  J. Webster,et al.  Knowledge hiding in organizations , 2012 .

[18]  Onne Janssen Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour , 2000 .

[19]  D. Bachrach,et al.  The interactive effects of person-focused citizenship behaviour, task interdependence, and virtuality on team performance , 2011 .

[20]  Melissa J. Williams Serving the Self From the Seat of Power , 2014 .

[21]  M. Hitt,et al.  Tipping Point , 2015 .

[22]  C. Schultz,et al.  Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Creative Performance in Healthcare Teams , 2012 .

[23]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[24]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Professional diversity, identity salience and team innovation: The moderating role of openmindedness norms , 2015 .

[25]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Leader power and leader self-serving behavior: The role of effective leadership beliefs and performance information , 2010 .

[26]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. , 2006 .

[27]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[28]  Vincent Rousseau,et al.  When Leaders Stifle Innovation in Work Teams: The Role of Abusive Supervision , 2018 .

[29]  Chun-hsi Vivian Chen,et al.  Interdependence and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Exploring the Mediating Effect of Group Cohesion in Multilevel Analysis , 2009, The Journal of psychology.

[30]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[31]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[32]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Task interdependence and extrarole behavior : a test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility , 1991 .

[33]  J. Perry-Smith Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[34]  J. Edwards,et al.  Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[35]  Seokhwa Yun,et al.  Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea , 2013 .

[36]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Amir Pezeshkan,et al.  Psychological Safety : A Meta ‐ Analytic Review and Extension , 2018 .

[38]  B. Tepper,et al.  Consequences of Abusive Supervision , 2000 .

[39]  Alice H. Y. Hon,et al.  Team Creative Performance , 2013 .

[40]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[41]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams , 2004 .

[42]  H. Triandis,et al.  Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation , 1985 .

[43]  M. Černe,et al.  What Goes Around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity , 2014 .

[44]  P. Earley Social Loafing and Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China. , 1989 .

[45]  Jeremy F. Dawson,et al.  DO WE HAVE ENOUGH? THE ACCURACY OF INCOMPLETE DATA FROM SMALL GROUPS. , 2003 .

[46]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[47]  T. D. Kemper Representative Roles and the Legitimation of Deviance , 1966 .

[48]  A. Carmeli,et al.  Leadership, Creative Problem-Solving Capacity, and Creative Performance: The Importance of Knowledge Sharing , 2013 .

[49]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Innovation by Teams in Shanghai, China: Cooperative Goals for Group Confidence and Persistence , 2009 .

[50]  Leon Mann,et al.  Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance , 2010 .

[51]  Michael E. Brown,et al.  Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing , 2005 .

[52]  Qinxuan Gu,et al.  How abusive supervision and abusive supervisory climate influence salesperson creativity and sales team effectiveness in China , 2016 .

[53]  Wenxing Liu,et al.  Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification , 2016 .

[54]  J. Stouten,et al.  My Share Is Fair, So I Don’t Care: The Moderating Role of Distributive Justice in the Perception of Leaders’ Self-Serving Behavior , 2012 .

[55]  Kaifeng Jiang,et al.  Leader Humility and Team Creativity: The Role of Team Information Sharing, Psychological Safety, and Power Distance , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Jibao Gu,et al.  Abusive supervision and employee creativity in China: Departmental identification as mediator and face as moderator , 2016 .

[57]  Dong Liu,et al.  The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity , 2012, Academy of Management Journal.

[58]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Teams as innovative systems: multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  R. Reiter-Palmon,et al.  Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective , 2004 .

[60]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Leader self-definition and leader self-serving behavior , 2010 .

[61]  Y. Gong,et al.  Unfolding the Proactive Process for Creativity , 2012 .

[62]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[63]  A. Tsui,et al.  Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes ☆ ☆☆ , 2011 .

[64]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[65]  R. Kark,et al.  Leading by example: the case of leader OCB. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[67]  Tal Katz-Navon,et al.  When Collective- and Self-Efficacy Affect Team Performance , 2005 .

[68]  T. M. Tripp,et al.  The role of employees' OCB and leaders' hindrance stress in the emergence of self-serving leadership , 2014 .

[69]  C. Shalley,et al.  WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[70]  Ryan Fehr,et al.  How Do Leaders React When Treated Unfairly? Leader Narcissism and Self-Interested Behavior in Response to Unfair Treatment , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. , 1990 .

[72]  Antonio J. Verdú-Jover,et al.  The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Performance through Knowledge and Innovation , 2008 .

[73]  Yaping Gong,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity , 2013 .

[74]  D. Chan Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[75]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Creativity in Organizations , 2014 .

[76]  Chia-yu Kou,et al.  Collective Engagement in Creative Tasks , 2013 .

[77]  He Peng,et al.  Why and when do people hide knowledge? , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[78]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[79]  H. Zacher,et al.  Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation , 2015 .

[80]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Effects of Different Leader Behaviors under Different Levels of Task Interdependence , 1986 .

[81]  David De Cremer,et al.  When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers' prevention focus. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  T. M. Tripp,et al.  Followers’ reactions to self-serving leaders: the influence of the organization's budget policy , 2014 .

[83]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  The Influence of Psychological Safety and Confidence in Knowledge on Employee Knowledge Sharing , 2009, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[84]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[85]  A. Somech,et al.  Team conflict management and team effectiveness: the effects of task interdependence and team identification , 2009 .

[86]  R. Liden,et al.  Social Loafing: A Field Investigation , 2004 .