Linc‐MYH configures INO80 to regulate muscle stem cell numbers and skeletal muscle hypertrophy

Chromatin remodeling complexes have functions in transcriptional regulation and chromosome maintenance, but it is mostly unknown how the function of these normally ubiquitous complexes is specified in the cellular context. Here, we describe that the evolutionary conserved long non‐coding RNA linc‐MYH regulates the composition of the INO80 chromatin remodeler complex in muscle stem cells and prevents interaction with WDR5 and the transcription factor YY1. Linc‐MYH acts as a selective molecular switch in trans that governs the pro‐proliferative function of the ubiquitous INO80 complex but does not affect its role in maintaining genomic stability. The molecular switch is essential for restricting generation of quiescent MuSCs and proliferation of myoblasts in homeostasis and regeneration. Since linc‐MYH is expressed in proliferating myoblasts but not in quiescent MuSCs, we reason that the extent of myoblast proliferation has decisive effects on the size of the quiescent MuSC pool.

[1]  Z. Graham,et al.  Myokines in skeletal muscle physiology and metabolism: Recent advances and future perspectives , 2020, Acta physiologica.

[2]  Abdullahi Umar Ibrahim,et al.  Genome Engineering Using the CRISPR Cas9 System , 2019 .

[3]  Tom H. Cheung,et al.  YY1 regulates skeletal muscle regeneration through controlling metabolic reprogramming of satellite cells , 2019, The EMBO journal.

[4]  Rory Johnson,et al.  Global Positioning System: Understanding Long Noncoding RNAs through Subcellular Localization. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[5]  T. Rando,et al.  Stem Cell Quiescence: Dynamism, Restraint, and Cellular Idling. , 2019, Cell stem cell.

[6]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Orienting Muscle Stem Cells for Regeneration in Homeostasis, Aging, and Disease. , 2018, Cell stem cell.

[7]  Tom H. Cheung,et al.  Impaired Notch Signaling Leads to a Decrease in p53 Activity and Mitotic Catastrophe in Aged Muscle Stem Cells. , 2018, Cell stem cell.

[8]  Sandipan Brahma,et al.  The Arp8 and Arp4 module acts as a DNA sensor controlling INO80 chromatin remodeling , 2018, Nature Communications.

[9]  Michael N. Wosczyna,et al.  A Muscle Stem Cell Support Group: Coordinated Cellular Responses in Muscle Regeneration. , 2018, Developmental cell.

[10]  S. Koul,et al.  Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4 Gamma 1 (eIF4G1) is upregulated during Prostate cancer progression and modulates cell growth and metastasis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[11]  S. Günther,et al.  Metabolic Maturation during Muscle Stem Cell Differentiation Is Achieved by miR-1/133a-Mediated Inhibition of the Dlk1-Dio3 Mega Gene Cluster. , 2018, Cell metabolism.

[12]  S. Fukada.  The roles of muscle stem cells in muscle injury, atrophy and hypertrophy. , 2018, Journal of biochemistry.

[13]  Rafael Ayala,et al.  Structure and regulation of the human INO80–nucleosome complex , 2018, Nature.

[14]  Karl-Peter Hopfner,et al.  Structural basis for nucleosome remodeling by the INO80 complex , 2018, Nature.

[15]  T. Magnuson,et al.  Identification of Two Distinct Classes of the Human INO80 Complex Genome-Wide , 2018, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[16]  M. De Bardi,et al.  HDAC4 regulates satellite cell proliferation and differentiation by targeting P21 and Sharp1 genes , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[17]  J. Turnbull,et al.  The Satellite Cell Niche Regulates the Balance between Myoblast Differentiation and Self-Renewal via p53 , 2018, Stem cell reports.

[18]  J. Mendell,et al.  Functional Classification and Experimental Dissection of Long Noncoding RNAs , 2018, Cell.

[19]  S. Tajbakhsh,et al.  Regulation and phylogeny of skeletal muscle regeneration. , 2018, Developmental biology.

[20]  S. Kang,et al.  INO80 haploinsufficiency inhibits colon cancer tumorigenesis via replication stress-induced apoptosis , 2017, Oncotarget.

[21]  D. Wigley,et al.  CryoEM structures of the human INO80 chromatin remodelling complex , 2017, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[22]  T. Rando,et al.  Transcriptional Profiling of Quiescent Muscle Stem Cells In Vivo. , 2017, Cell reports.

[23]  R. Legendre,et al.  In Situ Fixation Redefines Quiescence and Early Activation of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells. , 2017, Cell reports.

[24]  Ashby J. Morrison.  Genome maintenance functions of the INO80 chromatin remodeller , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  S. Gasser,et al.  The INO80 remodeller in transcription, replication and repair , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Kevin A. Murach,et al.  Differential requirement for satellite cells during overload-induced muscle hypertrophy in growing versus mature mice , 2017, Skeletal Muscle.

[27]  Ge Gao,et al.  CPC2: a fast and accurate coding potential calculator based on sequence intrinsic features , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Sex‐specific, reciprocal regulation of ERα and miR‐22 controls muscle lipid metabolism in male mice , 2017, The EMBO journal.

[29]  B. Olwin,et al.  Regulation of skeletal muscle stem cells by fibroblast growth factors , 2017, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[30]  F. Myers,et al.  RNA Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization Proximity Ligation Assay (rISH-PLA), an Assay for Detecting RNA-Protein Complexes in Intact Cells. , 2017, Current protocols in cell biology.

[31]  Zhengquan Yu,et al.  miRNA-34c inhibits myoblasts proliferation by targeting YY1 , 2017, Cell cycle.

[32]  S. Zou,et al.  INO80 is Required for Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[33]  P. Muñoz-Cánoves,et al.  Regulation of Muscle Stem Cell Functions: A Focus on the p38 MAPK Signaling Pathway , 2016, Front. Cell Dev. Biol..

[34]  D. Bennett,et al.  Ino80 is essential for proximal-distal axis asymmetry in part by regulating Bmp4 expression , 2016, BMC Biology.

[35]  Albert E. Almada,et al.  Molecular circuitry of stem cell fate in skeletal muscle regeneration, ageing and disease , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  S. Kostin,et al.  Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Quiescence by Suv4-20h1-Dependent Facultative Heterochromatin Formation. , 2016, Cell stem cell.

[37]  J. Cavaillon,et al.  Comparative Study of Injury Models for Studying Muscle Regeneration in Mice , 2016, PloS one.

[38]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  B. Olwin,et al.  Pervasive satellite cell contribution to uninjured adult muscle fibers , 2015, Skeletal Muscle.

[40]  K. Tsuchida,et al.  Calcitonin Receptor Signaling Inhibits Muscle Stem Cells from Escaping the Quiescent State and the Niche. , 2015, Cell reports.

[41]  Fei Wang,et al.  Negative Regulation of p21Waf1/Cip1 by Human INO80 Chromatin Remodeling Complex Is Implicated in Cell Cycle Phase G2/M Arrest and Abnormal Chromosome Stability , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  M. Looso,et al.  Prmt5 is a regulator of muscle stem cell expansion in adult mice , 2015, Nature Communications.

[43]  M. Yandell,et al.  Muscle stem cells contribute to myofibers in sedentary adult mice , 2015, Nature Communications.

[44]  Matthew E. Ritchie,et al.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  B. Anachkova,et al.  The mammalian INO80 chromatin remodeling complex is required for replication stress recovery , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[46]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  Accurate Proteome-wide Label-free Quantification by Delayed Normalization and Maximal Peptide Ratio Extraction, Termed MaxLFQ * , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[47]  Raja Jothi,et al.  INO80 facilitates pluripotency gene activation in embryonic stem cell self-renewal, reprogramming, and blastocyst development. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[48]  V. Hakim,et al.  Six Homeoproteins and a linc-RNA at the Fast MYH Locus Lock Fast Myofiber Terminal Phenotype , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[49]  S. Cusack,et al.  Structural analysis of the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 complex reveals that WDR5 is required for efficient assembly and chromatin targeting of the NSL complex , 2014, Genes & development.

[50]  J. Call,et al.  Exceptional Evolutionary Divergence of Human Muscle and Brain Metabolomes Parallels Human Cognitive and Physical Uniqueness , 2014, PLoS biology.

[51]  Atsushi Asakura,et al.  Muscle satellite cell heterogeneity and self-renewal , 2014, Front. Cell Dev. Biol..

[52]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[53]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Structure and Subunit Topology of the INO80 Chromatin Remodeler and Its Nucleosome Complex , 2013, Cell.

[54]  P. Muñoz-Cánoves,et al.  Functional dysregulation of stem cells during aging: a focus on skeletal muscle stem cells , 2013, The FEBS journal.

[55]  Lei Li,et al.  The mINO80 chromatin remodeling complex is required for efficient telomere replication and maintenance of genome stability , 2013, Cell Research.

[56]  D. Bartel,et al.  lincRNAs: Genomics, Evolution, and Mechanisms , 2013, Cell.

[57]  J. Pell,et al.  Ezh2 maintains a key phase of muscle satellite cell expansion but does not regulate terminal differentiation , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[58]  G. Pavlath,et al.  Myoblast fusion: lessons from flies and mice , 2012, Development.

[59]  Tiziana Bonaldi,et al.  Yin Yang 1 extends the Myc-related transcription factors network in embryonic stem cells , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[60]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. , 2011, Genes & development.

[61]  Jennifer A. Lawson,et al.  Satellite cells , connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration , 2022 .

[62]  Yong Cai,et al.  Subunit Organization of the Human INO80 Chromatin Remodeling Complex , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[63]  Y. Murakami,et al.  The mammalian INO80 complex is recruited to DNA damage sites in an ARP8 dependent manner. , 2010, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[64]  Robert B. White,et al.  Dynamics of muscle fibre growth during postnatal mouse development , 2010, BMC Developmental Biology.

[65]  M. Cole,et al.  Subunit Composition and Substrate Specificity of a MOF-containing Histone Acetyltransferase Distinct from the Male-specific Lethal (MSL) Complex* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  H. Kestler,et al.  p53 deletion impairs clearance of chromosomal-instable stem cells in aging telomere-dysfunctional mice , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[67]  Y. Liu,et al.  p53 regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[68]  M. Kyba,et al.  Prospective Isolation of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells with a Pax7 Reporter , 2008, Stem cells.

[69]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[70]  J. Zavadil,et al.  eIF4GI links nutrient sensing by mTOR to cell proliferation and inhibition of autophagy , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[71]  Yang Shi,et al.  A YY1–INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination–based repair , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[72]  M. Washburn,et al.  YY1 functions with INO80 to activate transcription , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[73]  Yong Zhang,et al.  CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[74]  M. Mann,et al.  In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[75]  J. Rogers,et al.  A genome-wide, end-sequenced 129Sv BAC library resource for targeting vector construction. , 2005, Genomics.

[76]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  Nancy A. Jenkins,et al.  Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[78]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Pax 3 : Fkhr interferes with embryonic Pax 3 and Pax 7 function : implications for alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma cell of origin , 2004 .

[79]  G. Lyons,et al.  The Polycomb Ezh2 methyltransferase regulates muscle gene expression and skeletal muscle differentiation. , 2004, Genes & development.

[80]  T. Braun,et al.  Pax7 directs postnatal renewal and propagation of myogenic satellite cells but not their specification , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[81]  T. Braun,et al.  Myostatin mutation associated with gross muscle hypertrophy in a child. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[82]  T. Ekström,et al.  YY1 binding to a subset of p53 DNA-target sites regulates p53-dependent transcription. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[83]  M. Mann,et al.  Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[84]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Pax7 Is Required for the Specification of Myogenic Satellite Cells , 2000, Cell.

[85]  Reynaldo Sequerra,et al.  High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxP , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[86]  M. Jaye,et al.  The mRNAs encoding acidic FGF, basic FGF and FGF receptor are coordinately downregulated during myogenic differentiation. , 1991, Development.

[87]  J. Fickett.  Recognition of protein coding regions in DNA sequences. , 1982, Nucleic acids research.

[88]  A. Mauro.  SATELLITE CELL OF SKELETAL MUSCLE FIBERS , 1961, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.

[89]  F. Dilworth,et al.  Epigenetic Regulation of Adult Myogenesis. , 2018, Current topics in developmental biology.

[90]  M. Bianchi,et al.  HDAC 4 regulates satellite cell proliferation and differentiation by targeting P 21 and Sharp 1 genes , 2018 .

[91]  B. Gloss,et al.  The specificity of long noncoding RNA expression. , 2016, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[92]  A. Khalil,et al.  Co-Immunoprecipitation of long noncoding RNAs. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[93]  D. Allbrook.  Muscle regeneration. , 1973, Physiotherapy.