Therapie der ureteropelvinen Stenose im Erwachsenenalter

Zusammenfassung Die ureteropelvine Stenose, synonym Subpelvin- oder Nierenbeckenabgangsstenose, beschreibt eine Obstruktion im Bereich des pyeloureteralen Übergangs, in deren Folge eine renale Harnabflussstörung resultiert, die es zu behandeln gilt. Seit der Erstbeschreibung der Pyeloplastik durch Trendelenburg 1886 und der erfolgreichen Etablierung durch Anderson und Hynes 1949 haben sich die Behandlungsstrategien der Nierenbeckenplastik vor allem in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten weiterentwickelt. Zwar gilt die offene Pyeloplastik nach wie vor als Goldstandard, doch wird diese heutzutage durch moderne minimal-invasive Techniken ergänzt. Dies inkludiert u. a. die laparoskopische Pyeloplastik, laparoskopische Single-Site Pyeloplastik, roboter-assistierte Pyeloplastik, roboter-assistierte Single-Site Pyeloplastik sowie die Endopyelotomie. Dieser Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über die Therapie der ureteropelvinen Stenose sowie das Komplikationsmanagement der Pyeloplastik im Erwachsenenalter.

[1]  P. Mucksavage,et al.  Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction , 2016, Current Urology Reports.

[2]  G. Smith,et al.  Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty: are we all really on the same page? , 2016, ANZ journal of surgery.

[3]  K. Siddiqui,et al.  Is laparoscopic pyeloplasty a comparable option to treat Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)? A comparative study. , 2016, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[4]  J. A. Amón Sesmero,et al.  Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Always Dismembered? , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[5]  K. Ishibashi,et al.  Laparoscopic modified bypass pyeloplasty: a simple procedure for straightforward ureteral spatulation and intracorporeal suturing , 2015, International Urology and Nephrology.

[6]  O. Çelik,et al.  An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction , 2015, Central European journal of urology.

[7]  A. Kibel,et al.  Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database , 2015, World Journal of Urology.

[8]  A. Haese*,et al.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: Excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty]. , 2015, Der Urologe. Ausg. A.

[9]  A. Fernando,et al.  Is routine postoperative diuresis renography indicated in all adult patients after pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction? , 2015, Urology.

[10]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults , 2014, Nature Reviews Urology.

[11]  A. Harraz,et al.  Evaluation of Factors Predicting Recoverability of Renal Function after Pyeloplasty in Adults , 2014, Urologia Internationalis.

[12]  Riccardo Autorino,et al.  Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, European urology.

[13]  M. Gargouri,et al.  The long-term results of laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty in adults , 2013, Arab Journal of Urology.

[14]  Mathew D. Sorensen,et al.  Relative renal function does not improve after relieving chronic renal obstruction , 2012, BJU international.

[15]  Charles R. Moore,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience. , 2012, Urology.

[16]  M. Stifelman,et al.  Analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyleloplasty for primary versus secondary repair in 119 consecutive cases. , 2011, Urology.

[17]  P. Shao,et al.  Comparison of Two Different Suture Methods in Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty , 2011, Urologia Internationalis.

[18]  J. Kasprzak,et al.  Clavien classification of complications after 150 laparoscopic pyeloplasties. , 2011, Urology.

[19]  J. Raman,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty , 2011, Therapeutic advances in urology.

[20]  A. Cestari,et al.  Retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty in adults: techniques and results. , 2010, European urology.

[21]  P. Fornara,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and results in 105 patients , 2010, World Journal of Urology.

[22]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[23]  S. Herrell,et al.  Measuring the true success of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[24]  Jinsung Park,et al.  Long‐term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction , 2008, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[25]  B. Haben,et al.  Open ureterocalycostomy , 2008, BJU international.

[26]  G. Chow,et al.  First Prize: Long-Term Success of Antegrade Endopyelotomy Compared with Pyeloplasty at a Single Institution , 2006 .

[27]  M. Ghoneim,et al.  Replacing the ureter by an ileal tube, using the Yang‐Monti procedure , 2005, BJU international.

[28]  T. Gianduzzo,et al.  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[29]  O. Göǧüs,et al.  Long-Term Results of Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty in 180 Adults in the Era of Endourologic Procedures , 2004, Urologia Internationalis.

[30]  H. Razvi,et al.  Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. , 2004, Urology.

[31]  Raju Thomas,et al.  Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. , 2003, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[32]  D. Canning Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[33]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. , 2002, Urology.

[34]  F. E. Foley A new plastic operation for stricture at the uretero-pelvic junction. Report of 20 operations. 1937. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[35]  P. O’Reilly,et al.  The long‐term results of Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty , 2001, BJU international.

[36]  P. Fornara,et al.  Why Is Urological Laparoscopy Minimally Invasive? , 2000, European Urology.

[37]  M. Roarke,et al.  Provocative imaging. Diuretic renography. , 1998, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[38]  A. Smith,et al.  Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[39]  G. Preminger,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[40]  N. Little Atlas of Urologic Surgery , 1990 .

[41]  P. Kelalis,et al.  Ureterocalicostomy: indications and results in 21 patients. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[42]  D. Bagley,et al.  Endoscopic ureteropyelostomy: opening the obliterated ureteropelvic junction with nephroscopy and flexible ureteropyeloscopy. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[43]  J. Wickham,et al.  Percutaneous pyelolysis. , 1983, European urology.

[44]  S. Goldman,et al.  Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: its occurrence in 3 members of a single family. , 1978, The Journal of urology.

[45]  C. Bratt,et al.  Renal function in patients with hydronephrosis. , 1977, British journal of urology.

[46]  P. L. Scardino,et al.  Vertical flap ureteropelvioplasty. , 1953, Southern medical journal.

[47]  O. Culp,et al.  A pelvic flap operation for certain types of ureteropelvic obstruction; preliminary report. , 1951, Proceedings of the staff meetings. Mayo Clinic.

[48]  J. C. Anderson,et al.  RETROCAVAL URETER:A Case diagnosed pre‐operatively and treated successfully by a Plastic Operation , 1949 .

[49]  F. E. Foley A New Plastic Operation for Stricture at the Uretero-Pelvic Junction: Report of 20 Operations11Read before the American Urological Association meeting, Minneapolis, June 28–July 1, 1937. , 1937 .