A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data

A brightness discrimination experiment was performed to examine how subjects decide whether a patch of pixels is “bright” or “dark,” and stimulus duration, brightness, and speed versus accuracy instructions were manipulated. The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) was fit to the data, and it accounted for all the dependent variables: mean correct and error response times, the shapes of response time distributions for correct and error responses, and accuracy values. Speed-accuracy manipulations affected only boundary separation (response criteria settings) in the model. Drift rate (the rate of accumulation of evidence) in the diffusion model, which represents stimulus quality, increased as a function of stimulus duration and stimulus brightness but asymptoted as stimulus duration increased from 100 to 150 msec. To address the argument that the diffusion model can fit any pattern of data, simulated patterns of plausible data are presented that the model cannot fit.

[1]  W. N. Kellogg.  The Time of Judgment in Psychometric Measures , 1931 .

[2]  M. Stone.  Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .

[3]  D. LaBerge.  A recruitment theory of simple behavior , 1962 .

[4]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[5]  R. Sekuler.  SIGNAL DETECTION, CHOICE RESPONSE TIMES, AND VISUAL BACKWARD MASKING. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  Reaction-time distributions in the detection of weak signals in noise. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[8]  Richard G. Swensson,et al.  The elusive tradeoff: Speed vs accuracy in visual discrimination tasks , 1972 .

[9]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[10]  Paul Muter,et al.  Response latencies in discriminations of recency , 1979 .

[11]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Michael J. Hacker.  Speed and accuracy of recency judgments for events in short-term memory. , 1980 .

[13]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  R. Ratcliff.  Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[15]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[16]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination , 1988 .

[17]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[18]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Relating Theory and Data : Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock , 1991 .

[19]  G. Loftus,et al.  Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition. , 1994, Psychological review.

[20]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Philip L. Smith.  Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .

[22]  Philip L. Smith.  Bloch's law predictions from diffusion process models of detection , 1998 .

[23]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[25]  H Pashler,et al.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[26]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  R Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[28]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[29]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.