Research Implications of Universal Design

Over the last few years there has been growing interest in universal design— designing in such a way that people with and without disabilities can use the same products and building elements. Universal design is not a euphemism for familiar conceptions of accessibility. Rather, it involves a fundamental shift in thinking about design, particularly with regard to designing for people with disabilities.

[1]  Edward Steinfeld,et al.  Accessible Buildings for People with Walking and Reaching Limitations. , 1979 .

[2]  H W Stoudt,et al.  The Anthropometry of the Elderly , 1981, Human factors.

[3]  Edward Steinfeld,et al.  Enabling Home Environments , 1993 .

[4]  E. Badley,et al.  Disability, resources, role demands and mobility handicap. , 1995, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  Social identity and the International Classification of Handicaps: an evaluation of the consequences of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. , 1992, Disability and rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Edelstein.  Human Factors Engineering 3rd Ed , 1971 .

[7]  R. Waters,et al.  Gait Performance After Spinal Cord Injury , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J Hunter.  Energy costs of wheelchair propulsion by elderly and disabled people , 1987, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[9]  D. Dawson,et al.  The disablement experienced by traumatically brain-injured adults living in the community. , 1995, Brain injury.

[10]  Ernest J. McCormick,et al.  Human Factors Engineering , 1985 .

[11]  R. Scotch.  Disability as the Basis for a Social Movement: Advocacy and the Politics of Definition , 1988 .

[12]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  J. Perry,et al.  The relationship of lower extremity strength and gait parameters in patients with post-polio syndrome. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  M. Hoffman.  Environmental Accessibility and Independent Living Outcomes: Directions for Disability Policy and Research , 1982 .

[15]  L. Branch.  Research on disability: where is it leading? , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[16]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics , 2014 .

[17]  M F Story,et al.  An analysis of the effects of ramp slope on people with mobility impairments. , 1997, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[18]  Polly Welch.  Strategies for teaching universal design , 1995 .

[19]  R. G. Long.  Housing Design and Persons with Visual Impairment: Report of Focus-Group Discussions , 1995 .

[20]  M E Young,et al.  Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  L L Laubach,et al.  Anthropometry of aged male wheelchair-dependent patients. , 1981, Annals of human biology.

[22]  S V Fisher,et al.  Energy cost of ambulation with crutches. , 1981, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  H. Hahn,et al.  The Politics of Physical Differences: Disability and Discrimination , 1988 .

[24]  G. deJong,et al.  Physical disability and public policy. , 1983, Scientific American.

[25]  Gait performance after spinal cord injury : Applied kinesiology , 1993 .

[26]  F DeRuyter,et al.  Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment? , 1995, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[27]  Niels Diffrient.  Humanscale 4/5/6 , 1981 .