Optimal Rain Gauge Network Design and Spatial Precipitation Mapping Based on Geostatistical Analysis from Colocated Elevation and Humidity Data

The accurate estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution requires a dense network of instruments, which entails large installation and operational costs. It is thus necessary to optimize the number of rainfall stations and estimate point precipitation at unrecorded locations from existing data. This paper serves 2 objectives: i) to establish a spatial representative rainfall stations from the entire existing network in the study area (i.e., rainfall-data optimization); and ii) to use of multivariate geostatistical algorithm for incorporating relatively cheaper hydrological data into the spatial prediction of rainfall. The technique was illustrated using annual and monthly rainfall observations measured at 326 rainfall stations covering Yom river basin and its vicinity in Thailand. Optimal rain gauge network was designed based on the station redundancy and the homogeneity of the rainfall distribution. Digital elevation, humidity, and temperature models were incorporated into the spatial rainfall prediction using multivariate geostatistical algorithms. The results revealed that the multivariate geostatistical algorithm outperform the linear regression, stressing the importance of accounting for spatially dependent rainfall observations in addition to the collocated elevation. The digital elevation data were highly correlated to monthly monsoon-induced precipitation. Humidity and temperature data exhibited a higher degree of correlation to the monthly precipitation data.

[1]  R. Olea Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation By Pierre Goovaerts, Oxford University Press, Applied Geostatistics Series, 1997, 483 p., hardcover, $65 (U.S.), ISBN 0-19-511538-4 , 1999 .

[2]  Guy Delrieu,et al.  Rain Measurement by Raingage-Radar Combination: A Geostatistical Approach , 1988 .

[3]  D. Marks,et al.  A comparison of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitation in mountainous terrain , 1992 .

[4]  J. Hay,et al.  High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk Island: Part II: Interpolation of rainfall data , 1998 .

[5]  P. Goovaerts Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives , 1999 .

[6]  R. McCuen Hydrologic Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[7]  W. F. Krajewski,et al.  Spatial rainfall estimation by linear and non-linear co-kriging of radar-rainfall and raingage data , 1989 .

[8]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[9]  J. Salas,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNIQUES FOR SPATIAL INTERPOLATION OF PRECIPITATION , 1985 .

[10]  P. Goovaerts Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall , 2000 .

[11]  Reconstruction of Rainfall Fields By Combining Ground Raingauges Data with Radar Maps Using External Drift Method , 1997 .

[12]  A. H. Thiessen PRECIPITATION AVERAGES FOR LARGE AREAS , 1911 .

[13]  M. Borga,et al.  On the interpolation of hydrologic variables: formal equivalence of multiquadratic surface fitting and kriging , 1997 .

[14]  C. Daly,et al.  A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain , 1994 .

[15]  Margaret Armstrong Is Research in Mining Geostats as Dead as a Dodo , 1994 .