Can better governance increase university efficiency

This paper links governance reforms with potential improvements in efficiency in Spanish universities. Taking the classic DEA model as our starting-point, we focus on the study of efficient units to identify the ones that present atypical behaviour (outliers) and should be removed from the analysis, and then to order the remaining institutions in terms of what is known as robust efficiency. Moreover, we use a second stage regression analysis and a three-stage adjusted values non-parametric model to analyse the influence of environmental factors on the efficiency scores obtained. Once environmental factors are taken into account, the remaining unexplained inefficiency is attributed to governance failures. Our results indicate that the observed inefficiency in Spanish public universities is mainly determined by deficient governance. Thus, there is scope for improvements in efficiency through governance reform.

[1]  N. Avkiran.  INVESTIGATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE EFFICIENCIES OF AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES THROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[2]  J. Beasley.  Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies , 1995 .

[3]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Data envelopment analysis, nondiscretionary inputs and efficiency: an alternative interpretation , 1988 .

[4]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  State regulation and university behavior , 1993 .

[6]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[7]  A. Flegg,et al.  Does Expansion Cause Congestion? The Case of the Older British Universities, 1994–2004 , 2007 .

[8]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research , 2004 .

[9]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Incentives and productivity measurements , 1995 .

[10]  M. Abbott,et al.  Competition and efficiency: overseas students and technical efficiency in Australian and New Zealand universities , 2009 .

[11]  Maureen Tam,et al.  Measuring Quality and Performance in Higher Education , 2001 .

[12]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[13]  P. Cuttance.  Performance Indicators and the Management of Quality in Education. , 1990 .

[14]  F. Førsund,et al.  Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units , 1996 .

[15]  R. Ball,et al.  Performance indicators in higher education , 1987 .

[16]  Betty L. Hickman,et al.  Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix , 1997 .

[17]  Marcelino Martínez Cabrera.  Análisis de la eficiencia productiva de las instituciones de educación superior , 2000 .

[18]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  The Idea of Quality: Voicing the Educational , 1992 .

[19]  H. David Sherman,et al.  Health-Care Applications: From Hospitals to Physicians, from Productive Efficiency to Quality Frontiers , 2011 .

[20]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Enhancing The Performance of Credit Unions : The Evolution of a Methodology , 1994 .

[21]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[22]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[23]  Alberto Amaral,et al.  Reform and change in higher education : analysing policy implementation , 2005 .

[24]  Andrew C. Worthington,et al.  Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003 , 2008 .

[25]  The Determinants Of Costs And Efficiencies Where Producers Are Heterogeneous: The Case Of Spanish Universities , 2007 .

[26]  Sung-ko Li,et al.  Efficiency and productivity growth in Chinese universities during the post-reform period☆ , 2009 .

[27]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the Means of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[28]  Torben Schubert,et al.  Empirical observations on New Public Management to increase efficiency in public research--Boon or bane? , 2009 .

[29]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Research Funding and Performance in U.K. University Departments of Economics: A Frontier Analysis. , 1995 .

[30]  W. Greene.  On the estimation of a flexible frontier production model , 1980 .

[31]  H. Boer,et al.  On the Way towards New Public Management? The Governance of University Systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany , 2007 .

[32]  Rafael Caballero,et al.  Budgetary allocations and efficiency in the human resources policy of a university following multiple criteria , 2004 .

[33]  Wing Hong Chan,et al.  University Efficiency: A Comparison and Consolidation of Results from Stochastic and Non‐stochastic Methods , 2006 .

[34]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[35]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[36]  J. Ruggiero.  Measuring the Cost of Meeting Minimum Educational Standards: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis , 2007 .

[37]  P. W. Wilson.  Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs , 1993 .

[38]  N. Duch,et al.  Descentralización autonómica y sistema universitario , 2006 .

[39]  Tser-yieth Chen,et al.  A measurement of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries in Taipei , 1997 .

[40]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning , 1988 .

[41]  V. Giménez,et al.  Cost efficiency in the university: A departmental evaluation model , 2006 .

[42]  B. Borger,et al.  A Nash bargaining solution to models of tax and investment competition: tolls and investment in serial transport corridors , 2010 .