The Making of a Compound Inflorescence in Tomato and Related Nightshades

Variation in the branching of plant inflorescences determines flower number and, consequently, reproductive success and crop yield. Nightshade (Solanaceae) species are models for a widespread, yet poorly understood, program of eudicot growth, where short side branches are initiated upon floral termination. This “sympodial” program produces the few-flowered tomato inflorescence, but the classical mutants compound inflorescence (s) and anantha (an) are highly branched, and s bears hundreds of flowers. Here we show that S and AN, which encode a homeobox transcription factor and an F-box protein, respectively, control inflorescence architecture by promoting successive stages in the progression of an inflorescence meristem to floral specification. S and AN are sequentially expressed during this gradual phase transition, and the loss of either gene delays flower formation, resulting in additional branching. Independently arisen alleles of s account for inflorescence variation among domesticated tomatoes, and an stimulates branching in pepper plants that normally have solitary flowers. Our results suggest that variation of Solanaceae inflorescences is modulated through temporal changes in the acquisition of floral fate, providing a flexible evolutionary mechanism to elaborate sympodial inflorescence shoots.

[1]  M. Bliek,et al.  Role of EVERGREEN in the development of the cymose petunia inflorescence. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[2]  Mattijs Bliek,et al.  Patterning of Inflorescences and Flowers by the F-Box Protein DOUBLE TOP and the LEAFY Homolog ABERRANT LEAF AND FLOWER of Petunia[W] , 2008, The Plant Cell Online.

[3]  T. Laux,et al.  Differential expression of WOX genes mediates apical-basal axis formation in the Arabidopsis embryo. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[4]  Queenie K.-G. Tan,et al.  An Arabidopsis F-box protein acts as a transcriptional co-factor to regulate floral development , 2008, Development.

[5]  Kalika Prasad,et al.  Distinct regulatory role for RFL, the rice LFY homolog, in determining flowering time and plant architecture , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  K. Mysore,et al.  Control of Compound Leaf Development by FLORICAULA/LEAFY Ortholog SINGLE LEAFLET1 in Medicago truncatula1[C][W][OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[7]  J. Slavíková.  Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis , 1980, Biologia Plantarum.

[8]  H. Rickett.  The classification of inflorescences , 1944, The Botanical Review.

[9]  M. B. Crane.  Heredity of types of inflorescence and fruits in tomato , 1915, Journal of Genetics.

[10]  Rujin Chen,et al.  Control of compound leaf development by FLO/LFY ortholog Single Leaflet1 ( SGL1 ) in Medicago truncatula , 2008 .

[11]  Jia Liu,et al.  Diversity in conserved genes in tomato , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[12]  J. Chory,et al.  Combinations of WOX activities regulate tissue proliferation during Arabidopsis embryonic development. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[13]  J. Kyozuka,et al.  Rice ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION 1, encoding an F-box protein, regulates meristem fate. , 2007, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[14]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Evolution and Development of Inflorescence Architectures , 2007, Science.

[15]  J. Friml,et al.  In situ hybridization technique for mRNA detection in whole mount Arabidopsis samples , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[16]  Graham J King,et al.  A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Y. Eshed,et al.  The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  G. Haughn,et al.  UFO in the Arabidopsis inflorescence apex is required for floral-meristem identity and bract suppression , 2006, Planta.

[19]  G. Angenent,et al.  Use of Petunia to unravel plant meristem functioning. , 2005, Trends in plant science.

[20]  D. Weigel,et al.  Requirement of Homeobox Gene STIMPY/WOX9 for Arabidopsis Meristem Growth and Maintenance , 2005, Current Biology.

[21]  Michael D. Gadberry,et al.  Genetic control of branching in foxtail millet , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Naama Menda,et al.  In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[23]  S. Tanksley.  The Genetic, Developmental, and Molecular Bases of Fruit Size and Shape Variation in Tomato , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[24]  T. Laux,et al.  Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2004, Development.

[25]  I. Sussex,et al.  Falsiflora and anantha control early stages of floral meristem development in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) , 1996, Planta.

[26]  J. Helm.  Vergleichende Betrachtungen über die Entwicklung der Infloreszenz beiLycopersicum esculentumMill. und bei einer Röntgenmutante , 1951, Der Züchter.

[27]  J. Stougaard,et al.  Proliferating Floral Organs (Pfo), a Lotus japonicus gene required for specifying floral meristem determinacy and organ identity, encodes an F-box protein. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[28]  J. Hofer,et al.  Stamina pistilloida, the Pea Ortholog of Fim and UFO, Is Required for Normal Development of Flowers, Inflorescences, and Leaves , 2001, Plant Cell.

[29]  Linda D. Sapp.  100 Heirloom Tomatoes for the American Garden , 2000 .

[30]  M. Jamilena,et al.  FALSIFLORA, the tomato orthologue of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, controls flowering time and floral meristem identity. , 1999, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[31]  J. Bowman,et al.  Distinct Mechanisms Promote Polarity Establishment in Carpels of Arabidopsis , 1999, Cell.

[32]  K. Theres,et al.  Genetic control of branching in Arabidopsis and tomato. , 1999, Current opinion in plant biology.

[33]  M. Ganal,et al.  The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. , 1998, Development.

[34]  R. Hellens,et al.  UNIFOLIATA regulates leaf and flower morphogenesis in pea , 1997, Current Biology.

[35]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  A LEAFY co-regulator encoded by UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS , 1997, Current Biology.

[36]  D. Zamir,et al.  An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. , 1995, Genetics.

[37]  R. Simon,et al.  Parallels between UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS and FIMBRIATA, genes controlling flower development in Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[38]  M. Yanofsky,et al.  Molecular basis of the cauliflower phenotype in Arabidopsis , 1995, Science.

[39]  D. Weigel,et al.  LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis , 1992, Cell.

[40]  Prof. Dr. Francis Hallé,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests , 1978, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.