Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment

Recruiting research participants based on genetic information generated about them in a prior study is a potentially powerful way to study the functional significance of human genetic variation. However, it also presents significant ethical challenges that, to date, have received only minimal consideration. We convened a multi-disciplinary workshop to discuss key issues relevant to the conduct and oversight of genotype-driven recruitment and to translate those considerations into practical policy recommendations. Workshop participants were invited from around the US, and included genomic researchers and study coordinators, research participants, clinicians, bioethics scholars, experts in human research protections, and government representatives. Discussion was directed by experienced facilitators and informed by empirical data collected in a national survey of IRB chairs and in-depth interviews with research participants in studies where genotype-driven recontact occurred. A high degree of consensus was attained on the resulting seven recommendations, which cover informed consent disclosures and choices, the process for how and by whom participants are recontacted, the disclosure of individual genetic research results, and the importance of tailoring approaches based on specific contextual factors. These recommendations are intended to represent a balanced approach—protecting research participants, yet avoiding overly restrictive policies that hinder advancement on important scientific questions.

[1]  C. Fernandez Public Expectations for Return of Results—Time to Stop Being Paternalistic? , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[2]  Patrick L. Taylor,et al.  Multidimensional Results Reporting to Participants in Genomic Studies: Getting It Right , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  R. Conley,et al.  Maintaining informed consent validity during lengthy research protocols. , 2007, IRB.

[4]  Robert C. Green,et al.  Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[5]  George Church,et al.  Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants: Updated Guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[6]  Epilepsy Patient-Participants and Genetic Research Results as “Answers” , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[7]  F. Miller,et al.  Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants. , 2005, JAMA.

[8]  B. Wilfond,et al.  Research Participants' Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[9]  S. Fullerton,et al.  Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Genetic Research and Implications for Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[10]  Ezekiel J Emanuel,et al.  Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Laura M. Beskow,et al.  Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  M. Guyer,et al.  Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside , 2011, Nature.

[13]  P. Blackshear,et al.  The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: a DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci , 2008, Human Genetics.

[14]  David B Goldstein,et al.  Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment. , 2010, Genome research.

[15]  J. Robert,et al.  Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[16]  N. Ram,et al.  Tiered Consent and the Tyranny of Choice , 2008 .

[17]  G. Henderson,et al.  The Meaning of Genetic Research Results: Reflections from Individuals with and without a Known Genetic Disorder , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[18]  C. Grady,et al.  Ethical issues in cancer chemoprevention trials: considerations for IRBs and investigators. , 2007, IRB.

[19]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[20]  Amy L McGuire,et al.  Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: enabling a bottom-up approach in genome-wide association studies. , 2008, Genome research.

[21]  R. Sandler,et al.  Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[22]  Alana D. Steffen,et al.  Recruitment approaches for family studies: attitudes of index patients and their relatives. , 2004, IRB.

[23]  Jeremy Sugarman,et al.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[24]  G. Laurie In defence of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know. , 1999, European journal of health law.

[25]  L. Henry Undesirable Implications of Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants , 2006 .

[26]  R. Andorno,et al.  The right not to know: an autonomy based approach , 2004, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[27]  L. Beskow,et al.  IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment. , 2012, IRB.