Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) using Multi-Criteria Evolutionary Algorithms

A growing area in aerospace engineering is the use and development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for military and civilian applications. There are difficulties in the design of these vehicles because of the varied and non-intuitive nature of the configurations and missions that can be performed. Similar to their manned counterparts, the challenge is to develop trade-off studies of optimal configurations to produce a high performance aircraft that satisfy mission requirements The goal in the present study is to address these issues from a multi-criteria and multidisciplinary design optimisation (MDO) standpoint. Traditional deterministic optimisation techniques for MDO are effective when applied to specific problems and within a specified range. These techniques are efficient in finding locally optimum solutions if the objective and constraints are differentiable. If a broader application of the optimiser is desired or when the problem is multi-modal, involve approximation, is non-differentiable or involve multiple criteria and multi-physics, robust and alternative numerical tools are required. Emerging techniques such as Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) have shown to be robust as they require no derivatives or gradients of the objective function, have the capability of finding globally optimum solutions amongst many local optima, are easily executed in parallel and can be adapted to arbitrary solver codes without major modifications. This paper examines the requirements, initial development, and application of a framework for Multidisciplinary Design and Optimisation (MDO) of UAVs. The framework includes a Graphical User Interface (GUI), a robust EA optimiser, several design modules, mesh generators and post-processing capabilities in an integrated platform. The application of the method is illustrated on a multi-criteria and multidisciplinary design problem. Results indicate the robustness of the method in finding optimal solutions and trade-offs between the disciplinary analyses and producing a set of individuals represented in an optimal Pareto front.

[1]  Shigeru Obayashi,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of aircraft wing planform based on evolutionary algorithms , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[2]  Thomas A. Zang,et al.  AIAA 99-3798 Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Techniques: Implications and Opportunities for Fluid Dynamics Research , 1999 .

[3]  Luis F. Gonzalez,et al.  Multidisciplinary Aircraft Design And Optimisation Using A Robust Evolutionary Technique With Variable Fidelity Models , 2004 .

[4]  Jacques Periaux,et al.  Advances in Hierarchical, Parallel Evolutionary Algorithms for Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation , 2002 .

[5]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[6]  J. C. Townsend,et al.  Framework Requirements for MDO Application Development , 1998 .

[7]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[8]  Mourad Sefrioui,et al.  A Hierarchical Genetic Algorithm Using Multiple Models for Optimization , 2000, PPSN.

[9]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[10]  Antony Jameson,et al.  A brief description of the Jameson-Caughey NYU transonic swept-wing computer program: FLO 22 , 1976 .

[11]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections , 1959 .

[12]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization - Survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[13]  Luis F. Gonzalez,et al.  Multidisciplinary Aircraft Conceptual Design Optimisation Using a Hierarchical Asynchronous Parallel Evolutionary Algorithm (HAPEA) , 2004 .

[14]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Considerations in engineering parallel multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[15]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[16]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolutionary Programming and Evolution Strategies: Similarities and Differences , 1993 .

[17]  Ian C. Parmee,et al.  Preliminary airframe design using co-evolutionary multiobjective genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[18]  Jack Dongarra,et al.  PVM: Parallel virtual machine: a users' guide and tutorial for networked parallel computing , 1995 .

[19]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  TRANSONIC AXIAL-FLOW BLADE SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL NAVIER-STOKES SOLVER , 2002 .

[20]  Erick Cantú-Paz,et al.  Efficient and Accurate Parallel Genetic Algorithms , 2000, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[21]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  Bijan Mohammadi,et al.  Fluid dynamics computation with NSC2KE : an user-guide : release 1.0 , 1994 .

[23]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[24]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  Aspects of the Matlab toolbox DACE , 2002 .

[25]  Peter Bartholomew,et al.  THE ROLE OF MDO WITHIN AEROSPACE DESIGN AND PROGRESS TOWARDS AN MDO CAPABILITY , 1998 .