Virtual geographic environments in socio-environmental modeling: a fancy distraction or a key to communication?

ABSTRACT Modeling and simulation are recognized as effective tools for management and decision support across various disciplines; however, poor communication of results to the end users is a major obstacle for properly using and understanding model output. Visualizations can play an essential role in making modeling results accessible for management and decision-making. Virtual reality (VR) and virtual geographic environments (VGEs) are popular and potentially very rewarding ways to visualize socio-environmental models. However, there is a fundamental conflict between abstraction and realism: models are goal-driven, and created to simplify reality and to focus on certain crucial aspects of the system; VR, in the meanwhile, by definition, attempts to replicate reality as closely as possible. This elevated realism may add to the complexity curse in modeling, and the message might be diluted by too many (background) details. This is also connected to information overload and cognitive load. Moreover, modeling is always associated with the treatment of uncertainty – something difficult to present in VR. In this paper, we examine the use of VR and, specifically, VGEs in socio-environmental modeling, and discuss how VGEs and simulation modeling can be married in a mutually beneficial way that makes VGEs more effective for users, while enhancing simulation models.

[1]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Understanding Your Users: A Practical Guide to User Requirements: Methods, Tools, and Techniques by Catherine Courage and Kathy Baxter , ISBN 1558609350 ( San Francisco : Morgan Kaufmann , 2005 ) 781 pages; $59.95; paperback. , 2007, Design Issues.

[2]  Hui Lin,et al.  Collaborative virtual geographic environments: A case study of air pollution simulation , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[3]  W. Schweigert,et al.  Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology , 2023 .

[4]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  The utilization of publicly available map types by non-experts – a choice experiment , 2015 .

[5]  Hui Lin,et al.  Prototyping an open environment for sharing geographical analysis models on cloud computing platform , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[6]  Jun Zhu,et al.  Efficient dam break flood simulation methods for developing a preliminary evacuation plan after the Wenchuan Earthquake , 2012 .

[7]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Panagiotis Petridis,et al.  Learning cultural heritage by serious games , 2014 .

[9]  M. Semenov,et al.  Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. , 2010 .

[10]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS , 2016 .

[11]  Doina Olaru,et al.  Fuzzy Logic for Social Simulation Using NetLogo , 2015, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[12]  Robert E. Dickinson,et al.  Modeling Evapotranspiration for Three‐Dimensional Global Climate Models , 2013 .

[13]  Jin Zhang,et al.  An integrated assessment of urban flooding mitigation strategies for robust decision making , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Alexey Voinov,et al.  Systems Science and Modeling for Ecological Economics , 2008 .

[15]  N. Oreskes 2 The Role of Quantitative Models in Science , 2003 .

[16]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REALISM ON THE CONFIDENCE IN SPATIAL DATA QUALITY IN STEREOSCOPIC 3D DISPLAYS , 2009 .

[17]  Michael Batty Virtual Geographic Environments: a primer , 2011 .

[18]  G. Box Science and Statistics , 1976 .

[19]  Alexey Voinov,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF A FISH POND ECOSYSTEM , 1984 .

[20]  Michael F. Goodchild Chapter 2 Virtual Geographic Environments as Collective Constructions , 2012 .

[21]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Visualizing Geospatial Information Uncertainty: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2005 .

[22]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Smart sustainable cities - Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Ifan D. H. Shepherd Travails in the third dimension: a critical evaluation of three-dimensional geographical visualization , 2008 .

[24]  M. Hilferink,et al.  Affective appraisal of 3D land use visualization , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[25]  Stephan Reichelt,et al.  Depth cues in human visual perception and their realization in 3D displays , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[26]  Suzanne A. Pierce,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders e Next generation , 2015 .

[27]  Avinash Konkani,et al.  Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension. , 2017, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[28]  Hui Lin,et al.  Real-Geographic-Scenario-Based Virtual Social Environments: Integrating Geography with Social Research , 2013 .

[29]  John R. Anderson Is human cognition adaptive? , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  John P. McIntire,et al.  Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review , 2014, Displays.

[31]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Michael Batty,et al.  Modelling and prediction in a complex world , 2005 .

[33]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  Virtual Reality: An Instructional Medium for Visual-Spatial Tasks. , 1992 .

[34]  Xiaoli Zhang,et al.  Differential patterns of 2D location versus depth decoding along the visual hierarchy , 2017, NeuroImage.

[35]  Samaneh Shokravi,et al.  Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[36]  J. Tainter The Collapse of Complex Societies , 1988 .

[37]  Michael Batty,et al.  Virtual Environments Begin to Embrace Process‐based Geographic Analysis , 2015, Trans. GIS.

[38]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  Slipstreaming human geosimulation in virtual geographic environments , 2015, Ann. GIS.

[39]  William R. Sherman,et al.  Understanding Virtual RealityInterface, Application, and Design , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[40]  James P. Bliss,et al.  The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Administering Spatial Navigation Training to Firefighters , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[41]  Gary Priestnall,et al.  Virtual Geographic Environments , 2012, GIScience 2012.

[42]  Forrest Stonedahl,et al.  The Complexities of Agent-Based Modeling Output Analysis , 2015, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[43]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[44]  David H. Laidlaw,et al.  Experiments in Immersive Virtual Reality for Scientific Visualization , 2002, Comput. Graph..

[45]  Hui Lin,et al.  Sino-VirtualMoon: A 3D web platform using Chang’E-1 data for collaborative research , 2012 .

[46]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  Intertwining agents and environments , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[47]  Weiguo Liu,et al.  A collaborative virtual geographic environment based on P2P and Grid technologies , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[48]  John McCarthy,et al.  SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTI CIAL INTELLIGENCE , 1987 .

[49]  Hui Lin,et al.  Virtual Geographic Environment: A Workspace for Computer-Aided Geographic Experiments , 2013 .

[50]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  A computational sandbox with human automata for exploring perceived egress safety in urban damage scenarios , 2018, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[51]  Rong Li,et al.  Simulation and analysis of congestion risk during escalator transfers using a modified social force model , 2015 .

[52]  Mahesh Prakash,et al.  Improving the reliability and utility of operational bushfire behaviour predictions in Australian vegetation , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[53]  Hui Lin,et al.  Developing dynamic virtual geographic environments (VGEs) for geographic research , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[54]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  Naïve Realism: Limits of Realism as a Display Principle , 2005 .

[55]  Todd Schenk,et al.  Embodied uncertainty: living with complexity and natural hazards , 2018 .

[56]  Stefano De Sabbata,et al.  Criteria of geographic relevance: an experimental study , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[57]  Hui Lin,et al.  Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs): A New Generation of Geographic Analysis Tool , 2013 .

[58]  Hui Lin,et al.  What's going on about geo-process modeling in virtual geographic environments (VGEs) , 2016 .

[59]  Carl D. Shapiro,et al.  From data to decisions: Processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments , 2017 .

[60]  Jianhua Gong,et al.  Simulation and analysis of individual trampling risk during escalator transfers , 2014 .

[61]  Alexey A. Voinov,et al.  Model integration and the role of data , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[62]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  SIMULATING NAVIGATION WITH VIRTUAL 3D GEOVISUALIZATIONS - A FOCUS ON MEMORY RELATED FACTORS , 2016 .

[63]  Lin Hui,et al.  A grid-based collaborative virtual geographic environment for the planning of silt dam systems , 2010 .

[64]  David W. Martin,et al.  Doing psychology experiments , 1977 .

[65]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Understanding Soil Acidification Process Using Animation and Text: An Empirical User Evaluation With Eye Tracking , 2014 .

[66]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[67]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Toward optimizing the design of virtual environments for route learning: empirically assessing the effects of changing levels of realism on memory , 2019, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[68]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  J. Tainter,et al.  The Collapse of Complex Societies , 1988 .

[70]  Hui Lin,et al.  A grid-based collaborative virtual geographic environment for the planning of silt dam systems , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[71]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Shared space: An augmented reality approach for computer supported collaborative work , 1998, Virtual Reality.

[72]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Geovisual analytics: human factors , 2015, Int. J. Digit. Earth.