Estimating individualized treatment rules for ordinal treatments

Precision medicine is an emerging scientific topic for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual patient characteristics. It is an important direction for clinical research, and many statistical methods have been proposed recently. One of the primary goals of precision medicine is to obtain an optimal individual treatment rule (ITR), which can help make decisions on treatment selection according to each patient's specific characteristics. Recently, outcome weighted learning (OWL) has been proposed to estimate such an optimal ITR in a binary treatment setting by maximizing the expected clinical outcome. However, for ordinal treatment settings, such as individualized dose finding, it is unclear how to use OWL. In this article, we propose a new technique for estimating ITR with ordinal treatments. In particular, we propose a data duplication technique with a piecewise convex loss function. We establish Fisher consistency for the resulting estimated ITR under certain conditions, and obtain the convergence and risk bound properties. Simulated examples and an application to a dataset from a type 2 diabetes mellitus observational study demonstrate the highly competitive performance of the proposed method compared to existing alternatives.

[1]  Donglin Zeng,et al.  Personalized Dose Finding Using Outcome Weighted Learning , 2016, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[2]  Menggang Yu,et al.  Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects , 2015, Biometrics.

[3]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[4]  Prasad Raghavendra,et al.  Agnostic Learning of Monomials by Halfspaces Is Hard , 2009, 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[5]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis , 2003, ICTAI.

[6]  Ling Li,et al.  Ordinal Regression by Extended Binary Classification , 2006, NIPS.

[7]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Approximation Algorithms , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[10]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[11]  G. Wahba,et al.  A Correspondence Between Bayesian Estimation on Stochastic Processes and Smoothing by Splines , 1970 .

[12]  Craig D. Shriver,et al.  Breast Cancer in the Personal Genomics Era , 2010, Current genomics.

[13]  Michael R Kosorok,et al.  Residual Weighted Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[14]  Hansheng Wang,et al.  Subgroup Analysis via Recursive Partitioning , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  Learning to Classify Ordinal Data: The Data Replication Method , 2007, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Eric B. Laber,et al.  A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes , 2012, Biometrics.

[17]  Wesley O. Johnson,et al.  Interaction trees: exploring the differential effects of an intervention programme for breast cancer survivors , 2011 .

[18]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[19]  D. DeMets,et al.  Fundamentals of Clinical Trials , 1982 .

[20]  Anthony Widjaja,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[21]  Haoda Fu,et al.  Estimating optimal treatment regimes via subgroup identification in randomized control trials and observational studies , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Diane M. Griffiths,et al.  THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA , 2007 .

[23]  S. Murphy,et al.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES. , 2011, Annals of statistics.

[24]  Lu Tian,et al.  Effectively Selecting a Target Population for a Future Comparative Study , 2013, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[25]  Susan A Murphy,et al.  Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification , 2011, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[26]  K. Bhaskaran,et al.  Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  Donglin Zeng,et al.  New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[28]  Ilya Lipkovich,et al.  Strategies for Identifying Predictive Biomarkers and Subgroups with Enhanced Treatment Effect in Clinical Trials Using SIDES , 2014, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[29]  Eric B. Laber,et al.  Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes. , 2015, Biometrika.

[30]  Ludwig A. Hothorn,et al.  Many-to-one Comparisons in Stratified Designs , 2002 .

[31]  A. Farmer,et al.  Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Ider Tseveendorj Piecewise-Convex Maximization Problems , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[33]  Ingo Steinwart,et al.  Fast rates for support vector machines using Gaussian kernels , 2007, 0708.1838.

[34]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  Donglin Zeng,et al.  Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning , 2012, Journal of the American Statistical Association.