What information survives saccades in the real world?

Recent change detection research demonstrates impressively that we do not retain and fuse the pictorial content of successive fixations. This raises two distinct issues: (1) when and how is point-by-point information lost or replaced? and (2) might more abstract information be extracted and retained from fixations? In this chapter I explore both of these issues. I consider the evidence for a very short-term richly detailed visual representation of the current target of fixation that survives the saccade but is overwritten by the content of each new fixation shortly after it begins. The possibility of abstract representations of the visual surroundings is then discussed. Under conditions of competitive, parallel processing, as are present in real life situations, multiple types of information are extracted and retained from complex natural scenes. Time courses for extraction vary between different types of information. The inclusion of eye movement data reveals a crucial role for fixations in information extraction. The data suggest that information assimilation into the representations tested here is dominated by the fovea and is integrated and accumulated from multiple foveations. From these studies we are able to construct a rudimentary framework, in which representational faithfulness and richness depend upon fixation history of that part of the visual scene, thus producing an efficient and potentially task-specific representation.

[1]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Transsaccadic memory of position and form. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[2]  M. Tarr,et al.  How Are Different Properties of a Scene Encoded in Visual Memory? , 2000 .

[3]  George Berkeley,et al.  A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge, 1734 , 1971 .

[4]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Hayhoe Vision Using Routines: A Functional Account of Vision , 2000 .

[6]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Reference frames in saccadic targeting , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Thomas . Hobbes The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury , 1839 .

[9]  B. Tatler Characterising the Visual Buffer: Real-World Evidence for Overwriting Early in Each Fixation , 2001, Perception.

[10]  David Melcher Persistence of visual memory for scenes : A medium-term memory may help us to keep track of objects during visual tasks , 2001 .

[11]  Peter De Graef,et al.  Transsaccadic memory for visual object detail. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[12]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions , 2000 .

[13]  H. Intraub Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. , 1981 .

[14]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[15]  W. Bevan,et al.  Perception: evolution of a concept. , 1958, Psychological review.

[16]  R. Haber The impending demise of the icon: A critique of the concept of iconic storage in visual information processing , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Harry Singer,et al.  Theoretical models and processes of reading , 1976 .

[18]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[19]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[20]  J. Henderson,et al.  The Role of Fixation Position in Detecting Scene Changes Across Saccades , 1999 .

[21]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  The Time Course of Abstract Visual Representation , 2003, Perception.

[22]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[23]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement , 1996, Vision Research.

[24]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and scene perception. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[25]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[28]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Perceiving an integrated visual world , 1993 .

[29]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[30]  K. Rayner,et al.  Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades , 1990 .

[31]  Hume's treatise. , 1894 .

[32]  G Richard,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans , 2000, Vision Research.

[33]  K. Rayner,et al.  Is visual information integrated across saccades? , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  M. Land,et al.  The Roles of Vision and Eye Movements in the Control of Activities of Daily Living , 1998, Perception.

[35]  G R Loftus,et al.  The functional visual field during picture viewing. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[36]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[37]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Failure to integrate visual information from successive fixations , 1983 .

[38]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Transsaccadic Memory and Integration During Real-World Object Perception , 1997 .

[39]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  What Is Integrated Across Fixations , 1992 .

[40]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  David Melcher,et al.  Persistence of visual memory for scenes , 2001, Nature.

[42]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Memory representations guide targeting eye movements in a natural task , 2000 .

[43]  O'Regan Jk,et al.  Integrating visual information from successive fixations: does trans-saccadic fusion exist? , 1983 .

[44]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Picture Changes During Blinks: Looking Without Seeing and Seeing Without Looking , 2000 .

[45]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  The Role of Iconic Memory in Change-Detection Tasks , 2000, Perception.

[46]  John M. Henderson,et al.  The Influence of Enantiomorphic Transformation on Transsaccadic Object Integration , 1999 .

[47]  K Verfaillie,et al.  Transsaccadic memory for position and orientation of saccade source and target. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  H. Intraub,et al.  Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[49]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  J. Henderson,et al.  Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  G. Berkeley Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision , 2004 .

[52]  G. Loftus,et al.  Differential Acquisition Rates for Different Types of Information from Pictures , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[53]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[54]  K. Rayner Eye movements and visual cognition : scene perception and reading , 1992 .

[55]  I. Biederman,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .

[56]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[57]  J. Henderson Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[58]  J. Grimes On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[59]  G. Berkeley A new theory of vision and other writings , 1910 .

[60]  D H Ballard,et al.  Hand-eye coordination during sequential tasks. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[61]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[62]  G W McConkie,et al.  Time course of visual information utilization during fixations in reading. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  M. Tarr Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[64]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[65]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Immediate post-saccadic information mediates space constancy , 1998, Vision Research.

[66]  J. Henderson,et al.  Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2002 .

[67]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[68]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Integrating visual information from successive fixations. , 1982, Science.

[69]  Peter De Graef,et al.  Scene-Context Effects and Models of Real-World Perception , 1992 .

[70]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[71]  G. Humphrey,et al.  Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[72]  R. E. Parker Picture processing during recognition. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  R. Haber,et al.  Contemporary theory and research in visual perception , 1970 .

[74]  D. N. Lee,et al.  Evidence for on-line visual guidance during saccadic gaze shifts , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.