Development of English language skills in oral production by adult students in intensive and regular EFL courses

Time is undoubtedly an important factor in second language learning, not only in terms of the total amount of hours allotted for a particular program, but also in relation to how such hours are distributed. Research in Canada has shown that when primary school students receive concentrated second language (L2) instruction they reach higher levels of competence than through regular lessons. The purpose of this study is to shed some light on the effect of time distribution on instructed L2 learning by examining the development of oral production skills (in terms of oral fluency, complexity, and accuracy) in regular vs. intensive programs for adult EFL learners registered in intermediate and advanced EFL courses. The results of the analyses suggest that, although there are no statistically significant differences in oral gains between program types, there is a slight tendency for greater gains in the case of learners receiving intensive instruction.

[1]  Raquel Serrano,et al.  Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? , 2007 .

[2]  Nina Spada,et al.  An Innovative Program for Primary ESL Students in Quebec , 1994 .

[3]  Carmen Muñoz,et al.  Chapter 1 .The Effects of Age on Foreign Language Learning: The BAF Project , 2006 .

[4]  Barbara Hinger,et al.  The distribution of instructional time and its effect on group cohesion in the foreign language classroom: A comparison of intensive and standard format courses , 2006 .

[5]  B. Vanpatten Attending to Form and Content in the Input , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[6]  C. Germain,et al.  L'Évaluation de la production écrite en français intensif: critères et résultats , 2004 .

[7]  Roger Gilabert Guerrero Task Complexity and L2 Narrative Oral Production , 2005 .

[8]  W. Lambert,et al.  Bilingual education of children;: The St. Lambert experiment , 1972 .

[9]  Pauline Foster,et al.  Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance , 1997 .

[10]  Shunji Inagaki,et al.  Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity , 1998 .

[11]  Sharon Lapkin French second language education in Canada : empirical studies , 1998 .

[12]  Peter Skehan,et al.  The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[13]  H. Stern The Time Factor and Compact Course Development , 1985 .

[14]  Anne Vermeer,et al.  Comparing measures of lexical richness , 2007 .

[15]  R. Ellis,et al.  The Effects of Pre‐Task Planning and On‐Line Planning on Fluency, Complexity and Accuracy in L2 Monologic Oral Production , 2003 .

[16]  Pauline Foster,et al.  Task Design and Second Language Performance: The Effect of Narrative Type on Learner Output , 2008 .

[17]  J. Carroll A Model of School Learning , 1963, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[18]  Duane V. Keilstrup Practical Guidelines and Activities for an Advanced Foreign Language Intensive Program. , 1981 .

[19]  J. Netten,et al.  Theoretical and Research Foundations of Intensive French , 2004 .

[20]  A. Vermeer Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data , 2000 .

[21]  Comparing Children's Oral Ability in Two ESL Programs , 2005 .

[22]  T. Homburg Holistic Evaluation of ESL Compositions: Can It Be Validated Objectively? , 1984 .

[23]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Intensive ESL Programmes in Quebec Primary Schools , 1989 .

[24]  Uta Mehnert,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTHS OF TIME FOR PLANNING ON SECOND LANGUAGE PERFORMANCE , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[25]  John B. Carroll Foreign Language Proficiency Levels Attained by Language Majors Near Graduation from College , 1967 .

[26]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The Carroll Model , 1989 .

[27]  C. Wickens Attention and skilled performance. , 1989 .

[28]  Laura Collins,et al.  Time and the Distribution of Time in L2 Instruction , 1999 .