Time-domain simulations of a 31-antenna array for breast cancer imaging

In this paper we discuss challenges related with time-domain simulations of a complete microwave radar imaging system for breast cancer detection. Two different numerical methods are considered to address this demanding electromagnetic problem featuring 31 ultra-wideband antennas. The first method is the Finite Integration Technique (FIT) applied in a regular grid and implemented in a commercial solver, whereas the second method is an in-house developed Finite-Volume Time-Domain (FVTD) code applied in a tetrahedral mesh. Our work focuses on the fundamental differences between the two approaches for the comprehensive full-wave modeling of the considered problem. The emphasis of the comparison is placed on the computational cost, which reveals the strengths and limitations of both methods for the problem considered.

[1]  J. Hesthaven,et al.  Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications , 2007 .

[2]  Ian J Craddock,et al.  Microwave Radar-Based Differential Breast Cancer Imaging: Imaging in Homogeneous Breast Phantoms and Low Contrast Scenarios , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[3]  R. B. Standler,et al.  A Modular Implementation of Dispersive Materials for Time-domain Simulations with Application to Gold Nanospheres at Optical Frequencies the Finite-volume Time-domain Algorithm Using Least Square Method in Solving Maxwell's Equations, " , 2022 .

[4]  Richard W. Ziolkowski,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Modified Finite Volume Technique for Maxwell's Equations , 1990 .

[5]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  FVTD—integral equation hybrid for Maxwell's equations , 2008 .

[6]  D. Baumann,et al.  Field-based scattering-matrix extraction scheme for the FVTD method exploiting a flux-splitting algorithm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[7]  Susan C. Hagness,et al.  Hardware acceleration of FDTD computations for 3-D microwave breast tomography , 2009, 2009 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[8]  T.M. Benson,et al.  Implicit Element Clustering for Tetrahedral Transmission-Line Modeling (TLM) , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[9]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[10]  R. Vahldieck,et al.  Spherical Perfectly Matched Absorber for Finite-Volume 3-D Domain Truncation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[11]  P. Leuchtmann,et al.  A generalized local time-step scheme for efficient FVTD simulations in strongly inhomogeneous meshes , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[12]  V. Shankar,et al.  A Time-Domain, Finite-Volume Treatment for the Maxwell Equations , 1990 .

[13]  Jin-Fa Lee,et al.  Time-domain finite-element methods , 1997 .

[14]  R. Benjamin,et al.  Towards contrast enhanced breast imaging using ultra-wideband microwave radar system , 2010, 2010 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS).

[15]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  Microwaves for breast cancer detection , 2003 .

[16]  A. Preece,et al.  Microwave Radar-Based Breast Cancer Detection: Imaging in Inhomogeneous Breast Phantoms , 2009, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[17]  D. Baumann,et al.  Finite-volume time-domain analysis of a cavity-backed Archimedean spiral antenna , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[18]  Jan Chomicki,et al.  Time Domain , 2018, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[19]  R. Benjamin,et al.  A Comparison of a Wide-Slot and a Stacked Patch Antenna for the Purpose of Breast Cancer Detection , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.