Thinking about knowing: conceptual foundations for interdisciplinary environmental research

SUMMARY Working across knowledge-based research programmes, rather than institutional structures, should be central to interdisciplinary research. In this paper, a novel framework is proposed to facilitate interdisciplinary research, with the goals of promoting communication, understanding and collaborative work. Three core elements need to be addressed to improve interdisciplinary research: the types (forms and functions) of theories, the underlying philosophies of knowledge and the combination of research styles; these three elements combine to form the research programme. Case studies from sustainability science and environmental security illustrate the application of this research programme-based framework. This framework may be helpful in overcoming often oversimplified distinctions, such as qualitative/quantitative, deductive/inductive, normative/descriptive, subjective/objective and theory/practice. Applying this conceptual framework to interdisciplinary research should foster theoretical advances, more effective communication and better problem-solving in increasingly interdisciplinary environmental fields.

[1]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[2]  D. Demeritt.  What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique , 2002 .

[3]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Crafting mixed‐method evaluation designs , 1997 .

[4]  G. Marcus.  Ethnography through Thick and Thin , 2021 .

[5]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Science, the very idea , 1988 .

[6]  I. Her.  Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture, in: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays . New-York/N.Y./USA etc , 2022 .

[7]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[8]  N. Castree,et al.  Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium , 1998 .

[9]  Dena Pedynowski.  Science(s) which, when and whose? Probing the metanarrative of scientific knowledge in the social construction of nature , 2003 .

[10]  Macartan Humphreys,et al.  Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution , 2005 .

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[12]  David Hume.  A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[13]  M. Friedman.  Essays in Positive Economics , 1954 .

[14]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[15]  Martin V. Curd,et al.  Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues , 1998 .

[16]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[17]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[18]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[19]  Hum Geogr,et al.  What is the ‘ social construction of nature ’ ? A typology and sympathetic critique , 2006 .

[20]  P. Rabinow,et al.  Interpretive social science : a second look , 1987 .

[21]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives , 1996 .

[22]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[23]  E. Shils,et al.  The Methodology Of The Social Sciences , 1949 .

[24]  Gretchen Rossman,et al.  Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[25]  Karen E. Till,et al.  Ethnography and participant observation , 2010 .

[26]  C. Hempel.  The Function of General Laws in History , 1942 .

[27]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[28]  Matson,et al.  Integration of environmental, agronomic, and economic aspects of fertilizer management , 1998, Science.

[29]  P. Collier,et al.  Greed and Grievance in Civil War , 1999 .

[30]  P. Gross,et al.  Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science , 1994 .

[31]  Melvin H. Marx,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. , 1971 .

[32]  T. Broadbent,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , 1972 .

[33]  D. Demeritt.  SCIENCE, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM AND NATURE , 2005 .

[34]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  TURNING THE TABLES: HOW CASE-ORIENTED RESEARCH CHALLENGES VARIABLE-ORIENTED RESEARCH , 1997 .

[35]  T. Kuhn,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? , 1970 .

[36]  Saleem H Ali,et al.  Environment and security , 2006 .

[37]  C. Geertz.  Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture , 1973 .

[38]  M. Friedman,et al.  The Methodology of Positive Economics , 2010 .

[39]  M. Resnik,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation. , 1966 .

[40]  Uskali Mäki.  The Methodology of Positive Economics , 2009 .

[41]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[42]  T. Homer-Dixon.  Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases , 1994 .

[43]  D. Hume,et al.  The philosophical works , 1964 .