Binocular Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration - A Supermarket Study

Advanced glaucomatous visual field loss may critically interfere with quality of life. The purpose of this study was to (i) assess the impact of binocular glaucomatous visual field loss on a supermarket search task as an example of everyday living activities, (ii) to identify factors influencing the performance, and (iii) to investigate the related compensatory mechanisms. Ten patients with binocular glaucoma (GP), and ten healthy-sighted control subjects (GC) were asked to collect twenty different products chosen randomly in two supermarket racks as quickly as possible. The task performance was rated as “passed” or “failed” with regard to the time per correctly collected item. Based on the performance of control subjects, the threshold value for failing the task was defined as μ+3σ (in seconds per correctly collected item). Eye movements were recorded by means of a mobile eye tracker. Eight out of ten patients with glaucoma and all control subjects passed the task. Patients who failed the task needed significantly longer time (111.47 s ±12.12 s) to complete the task than patients who passed (64.45 s ±13.36 s, t-test, p<0.001). Furthermore, patients who passed the task showed a significantly higher number of glances towards the visual field defect (VFD) area than patients who failed (t-test, p<0.05). According to these results, glaucoma patients with defects in the binocular visual field display on average longer search times in a naturalistic supermarket task. However, a considerable number of patients, who compensate by frequent glancing towards the VFD, showed successful task performance. Therefore, systematic exploration of the VFD area seems to be a “time-effective” compensatory mechanism during the present supermarket task.

[1]  B Esterman,et al.  Functional scoring of the binocular field. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[2]  C. Johnson,et al.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  D B Henson,et al.  Frequency Distribution of Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[4]  H. Quigley Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Sloane,et al.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Consumer Choice Behavior in Online and Traditional Supermarkets: The Effects of Brand Name, Price, , 2000 .

[7]  C. O'brien,et al.  Patients’ perception of visual impairment in glaucoma: a pilot study , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. , 1999, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[9]  Frans W. Cornelissen,et al.  The effect of visual field defects on eye movements and practical fitness to drive , 2002, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Friedman,et al.  Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  J. Keeffe,et al.  Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living , 2003, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[12]  C. Owsley,et al.  Is glaucoma associated with motor vehicle collision involvement and driving avoidance? , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  C. Owsley,et al.  Visual field defects and the risk of motor vehicle collisions among patients with glaucoma. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Driving Performance of Glaucoma Patients Correlates With Peripheral Visual Field Loss , 2005, Journal of glaucoma.

[15]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  The Influence of Artificial Scotomas on Eye Movements during Visual Search , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  E. Peli,et al.  Eye movements of patients with tunnel vision while walking. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  H. Quigley,et al.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020 , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Evaluation of quality of life for patients with glaucoma. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  L. A. Chiasson,et al.  Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  B. Munoz,et al.  Glaucoma and mobility performance: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Mary M Hayhoe,et al.  Task and context determine where you look. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[22]  L. A. Chiasson,et al.  Glaucoma and on-road driving performance. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  J. Rouland,et al.  Measurement of health‐related quality of life with glaucoma: validation of the Glau‐QoL© 36‐item questionnaire , 2008, Acta ophthalmologica.

[24]  G. Spaeth,et al.  The effect of personality on measures of quality of life related to vision in glaucoma patients , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[25]  P. Ramulu Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[26]  Beatriz Munoz,et al.  Glaucoma and reading speed: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation project. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Adaptation of eye-movements to simulated hemianopia in reading and visual exploration: Transfer or specificity? , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  J. Barbur,et al.  Exploring Eye Movements in Patients with Glaucoma When Viewing a Driving Scene , 2010, PloS one.

[29]  An Luo,et al.  We find before we Look: Neural signatures of target detection preceding saccades during visual search , 2010 .

[30]  J. Myers,et al.  Driving Cessation and Driving Limitation in Glaucoma: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project , 2010 .

[31]  R. Nagel,et al.  Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study , 2011 .

[32]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  An exploratory study of visual search performance in glaucoma , 2011, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[33]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye tracking over small and large shopping displays , 2011, PETMEI '11.

[34]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  Effects of Peripheral Visual Field Loss on Eye Movements During Visual Search , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[35]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Bayesian online clustering of eye movement data , 2012, ETRA.

[36]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Online Classification of Eye Tracking Data for Automated Analysis of Traffic Hazard Perception , 2013, ICANN.

[37]  Tore Kristensen,et al.  Understanding consumers' in-store visual perception: The influence of package design features on visual attention , 2013 .

[38]  H. Lemij,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance, Visual Detection Performance, and Eye-Scanning Behavior of Glaucoma Patients in a Driving Simulator: A Preliminary Study , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  W. Rosenstiel,et al.  Driving with Binocular Visual Field Loss? A Study on a Supervised On-Road Parcours with Simultaneous Eye and Head Tracking , 2014, PloS one.

[40]  On-road Driving Performance in Older Adults with Glaucoma , 2014 .

[41]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  The applicability of probabilistic methods to the online recognition of fixations and saccades in dynamic scenes , 2014, ETRA.