CAMBRIDGE WORKING PAPERS IN ECONOMICS A deep-narrative analysis of energy cultures in slum rehabilitation housing of Abuja, Mumbai and Rio de Janeiro for just policy design

Slum rehabilitation housing (SRH) are critical transitional spaces in urban informality that has deep-rooted implications on poverty alleviation efforts. However, current literature reports systemic injustices in SRH on access to essential services, including energy injustices. This study investigated distributive injustices in the SRH across three cities, Abuja, Mumbai and Rio de Janeiro, developing ‘energy cultures’ narratives. It employed a computational social science methodology that used textual analysis, followed by a constructivist grounded theoretic approach to inform just policy design. The analysis was performed at two scales to identify and contrast injustices in the study areas. The result at an aggregated scale showed commonalities were around the poor design of the built environment, administrative lags of the utilities and high electricity bills. Case studyspecific results showed that poverty penalties were linked with the energy cultures of each SRHs. In the Mumbai case, poverty penalties were associated with the aspirational purchase of household appliances due to move from slums to SRH. The Abuja case showed low power quality and load shedding frequently damaged appliances that increase the maintenance costs for the occupants. The Rio de Janeiro SRH case had injustices embedded through the adoption of inefficient appliances received as charity from higher-income households. Fuel stacking was also observed in the SRH that illustrated cultural identities associated with cooking energy. The conclusion was drawn to support just policy design by considering the socio-cultural context of the built environment, improving utility governance and promoting cleaner fuel mix at the household level. Reference Details CWPE 20101 Published 11 November 2020

[1]  Finn Müller-Hansen,et al.  Text as big data: Develop codes of practice for rigorous computational text analysis in energy social science , 2020 .

[2]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Grounded reality meets machine learning: A deep-narrative analysis framework for energy policy research , 2020, Energy research & social science.

[3]  Harsh Realities: Marginalized Women in Cities of the Developing World , 2020, Spotlight on the SDGs.

[4]  R. Bardhan,et al.  India nudges to contain COVID-19 pandemic: A reactive public policy analysis using machine-learning based topic modelling , 2020, PloS one.

[5]  S. Griffiths,et al.  Culture and low-carbon energy transitions , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[6]  M. Leach,et al.  Eager to connect, cautious to consume: An integrated view of the drivers and motivations for electricity consumption among rural households in Kenya , 2020 .

[7]  R. Lamberts,et al.  Energy Justice in Slum Rehabilitation Housing: An Empirical Exploration of Built Environment Effects on Socio-Cultural Energy Demand , 2020, Sustainability.

[8]  C. Foulds,et al.  Energy justice in the developing world: a review of theoretical frameworks, key research themes and policy implications , 2020 .

[9]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  The cultural barriers to a low-carbon future: A review of six mobility and energy transitions across 28 countries , 2020 .

[10]  Sugata Bag Urban Female Labor Force Participation and Its Correlates: A Comparative Study of Slum-Dwellers and Their Urban Counterparts of Three Metro Cities in India , 2020 .

[11]  S. Samarakoon A justice and wellbeing centered framework for analysing energy poverty in the Global South , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[12]  D. McCauley,et al.  Energy Justice, Hydropower and Grid Systems in the Global South , 2019, Energy Justice Across Borders.

[13]  Debajit Palit,et al.  Gender in Electricity Policymaking in India, Nepal and Kenya , 2019, Energy Justice Across Borders.

[14]  Gudina Terefe Tucho The Impacts of Policy on Energy Justice in Developing Countries , 2019, Energy Justice Across Borders.

[15]  J. Byrne,et al.  Expanding the Conceptual and Analytical Basis of Energy Justice: Beyond the Three-Tenet Framework , 2019, Front. Energy Res..

[16]  R. Bardhan,et al.  How does slum rehabilitation influence appliance ownership? A structural model of non-income drivers , 2019, Energy policy.

[17]  Y. Chandra,et al.  Topic Modeling the Research‐Practice Gap in Public Administration , 2019, Public Administration Review.

[18]  R. Bardhan,et al.  Discomfort and distress in slum rehabilitation: Investigating a rebound phenomenon using a backcasting approach , 2019, Habitat international.

[19]  Stacy M Carter,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory , 2019 .

[20]  A. Schiffer,et al.  Ethnographies of electricity scarcity: Mobile phone charging spaces and the recrafting of energy poverty in Africa , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[21]  Ronita Bardhan,et al.  Gender, domestic energy and design of inclusive low-income habitats: A case of slum rehabilitation housing in Mumbai, India , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[22]  Yuwan Malakar,et al.  The temporalities of energy justice: Examining India’s energy policy paradox using non-western philosophy , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[23]  D. Noonan,et al.  Justice Implications of Clean Energy Policies and Programs in the United States: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration , 2019, Sustainability.

[24]  Melanie Birks,et al.  Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers , 2019, SAGE open medicine.

[25]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Energy justice in the transition to low carbon energy systems: Exploring key themes in interdisciplinary research , 2019, Applied Energy.

[26]  Vanesa Castán Broto,et al.  Energy justice and sustainability transitions in Mozambique , 2018, Applied Energy.

[27]  J. Stephenson Sustainability cultures and energy research: An actor-centred interpretation of cultural theory , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[28]  Craig Whisker,et al.  Review: Adele E. Clarke, Carrie Friese & Rachel S. Washburn (2018). Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Interpretive Turn , 2018 .

[29]  M. Moezzi,et al.  Energy justice, unequal access to affordable warmth, and capability deprivation: A quantitative analysis for Belgium , 2018, Applied Energy.

[30]  Julia K. Steinberger,et al.  A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use , 2017 .

[31]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  First/last mile transit access as an equity planning issue , 2017 .

[32]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  (Re)Grounding grounded theory: a close reading of theory in four schools , 2017 .

[33]  David Grover,et al.  Social equity issues in the distribution of feed-in tariff policy benefits: A cross sectional analysis from England and Wales using spatial census and policy data , 2017 .

[34]  Shion Guha,et al.  Comparing grounded theory and topic modeling: Extreme divergence or unlikely convergence? , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Sergey I. Nikolenko,et al.  Topic modelling for qualitative studies , 2017, J. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Necessary energy uses and a minimum standard of living in the United Kingdom:energy justice or escalating expectations? , 2016 .

[37]  R. Day,et al.  Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework , 2016 .

[38]  Cameron Richards,et al.  Optimizing Grounded Theory for Policy Research , 2016 .

[39]  Arnab Jana,et al.  Mumbai slums since independence: Evaluating the policy outcomes , 2015 .

[40]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Energy Justice: Conceptual Insights and Practical Applications , 2015 .

[41]  Chian-Woei Shyu,et al.  Ensuring access to electricity and minimum basic electricity needs as a goal for the post-MDG development agenda after 2015 , 2014 .

[42]  D. Satterthwaite,et al.  Urban Poverty in the Global South: Scale and Nature , 2012 .

[43]  R. Trotter Qualitative research sample design and sample size: resolving and unresolved issues and inferential imperatives. , 2012, Preventive medicine.

[44]  K. Hornik,et al.  topicmodels: An R Package for Fitting Topic Models , 2011 .

[45]  Benjamin Sovacool Conceptualizing urban household energy use: Climbing the “Energy Services Ladder” , 2011 .

[46]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours , 2010 .

[47]  D. MacIsaac Sustainable Energy — Without the hot air , 2009 .

[48]  Jeffrey Michael Clair,et al.  Problematics of grounded theory: innovations for developing an increasingly rigorous qualitative method , 2009 .

[49]  J. Nijman,et al.  Against the odds: Slum rehabilitation in neoliberal Mumbai , 2008 .

[50]  P. Gill,et al.  Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups , 2008, BDJ.

[51]  Darrel Hankerson,et al.  Introduction to Information Theory and Data Compression , 2003 .

[52]  D. Rondinelli Housing the Urban Poor in Developing Countries , 1990 .

[53]  L. Norford,et al.  Indoor air quality among Mumbai's resettled populations: Comparing Dharavi slum to nearby rehabilitation sites , 2020 .

[54]  L. Norford,et al.  Investigating the association of healthcare-seeking behavior with the freshness of indoor spaces in low-income tenement housing in Mumbai , 2018 .

[55]  Mithra Moezzia,et al.  Narratives and Storytelling in Energy and Climate Change Research , 2017 .

[56]  David Robinson,et al.  Text Mining with R: A Tidy Approach , 2017 .

[57]  Kirsten E H Jenkins,et al.  Energy justice : a conceptual review , 2016 .

[58]  Michael H. Dworkin,et al.  Global Energy Justice: Principles, Problems and Practices , 2014 .

[59]  Katie Buchholz Energy Justice in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2014 .

[60]  Kirsten E H Jenkins,et al.  Advancing energy justice : the triumvirate of tenets and systems thinking , 2013 .

[61]  Emanuele Della Valle,et al.  An Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2013 .

[62]  R. Mendoza Why Do the Poor Pay More? Exploring the Poverty Penalty Concept , 2011 .

[63]  Cedric E. Ginestet ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2011 .

[64]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2009 .

[65]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[66]  Methodology Matters-V Focus Groups , 2005 .

[67]  E. Shove Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .