Suffix Ordering and Morphological Processing

There is a long-standing debate about the principles constraining the combinatorial properties of suffixes. Hay 2002 and Hay & Plag 2004 proposed a model in which suffixes can be ordered along a hierarchy of processing complexity. We show that this model generalizes to a larger set of suffixes, and we provide independent evidence supporting the claim that a higher rank in the ordering correlates with increased productivity. Behavioral data from lexical decision and word naming show, however, that this model has been one-sided in its exclusive focus on the importance of constituent-driven processing, and that it requires supplementation by a second and equally important focus on the role of memory. Finally, using concepts from graph theory, we show that the space of existing suffix combinations can be conceptualized as a directed graph, which, with surprisingly few exceptions, is acyclic. This acyclicity is hypothesized to be functional for lexical processing.

[1]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[2]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[3]  J. Hawkins,et al.  On Intelligence , 2004 .

[4]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  How Much do People Remember? Some Estimates of the Quantity of Learned Information in Long-Term Memory , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon , 1985, Speech Commun..

[6]  Ingo Plag,et al.  Word-Formation in English , 2018 .

[7]  M. Taft Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Jan P. H. van Santen,et al.  Duration and spectral balance of intervocalic consonants: A case for efficient communication , 2005, Speech Commun..

[10]  1. I NTRODUCTION,et al.  The role of selectional restrictions , phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English , 2001 .

[11]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[12]  Luigi Burzio Missing players: Phonology and the past-tense debate , 2002 .

[13]  Ingo Plag,et al.  What Constrains Possible Suffix Combinations? On the Interaction of Grammatical and Processing Restrictions in Derivational Morphology , 2004 .

[14]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  The Structure of phonological representations , 1982 .

[15]  Geert Booij,et al.  Prosodic restrictions on affixation in Dutch , 2002 .

[16]  M. Taft Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Hay From Speech Perception to Morphology: Affix Ordering Revisited , 2002 .

[19]  Dieter Jungnickel,et al.  Graphs, Networks, and Algorithms , 1980 .

[20]  H. Giegerich Lexical strata in English , 1999 .

[21]  R. Baayen,et al.  Productivity in context: a case study of a Dutch suffix , 1997 .

[22]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Renate Raffelsiefen,et al.  Phonological constraints on English word formation , 1999 .

[24]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: are they simply cumulative-frequency effects? , 2001, Cognition.

[25]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[26]  G. Libben,et al.  The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives , 2007 .

[27]  R. Schreuder,et al.  War and Peace: Morphemes and Full Forms in a Noninteractive Activation Parallel Dual-Route Model , 1999, Brain and Language.

[28]  R. Baayen,et al.  Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .

[29]  Lee H. Wurm,et al.  Auditory Processing of Prefixed English Words Is Both Continuous and Decompositional , 1997 .

[30]  Lee H. Wurm,et al.  Recognition of spoken prefixed words: The role of early conditional root uniqueness points , 2003 .

[31]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English , 2005 .

[32]  R. Baayen,et al.  Complex words in complex words , 1999 .

[33]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  Storage and computation in the mental lexicon , 2005 .

[34]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[35]  Christiane Dalton-Puffer,et al.  Categorywise, some Compound-Type Morphemes Seem to Be Rather Suffix-Like: On the Status of -ful, -type, and -wise in Present Day English , 2000 .

[36]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[37]  Dieter Kastovsky,et al.  English word-formation , 1986 .

[38]  Emden R. Gansner,et al.  A Technique for Drawing Directed Graphs , 1993, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[39]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? , 1987 .

[40]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Parsing and productivity , 2002 .

[41]  Joan L. Bybee Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[42]  Simeon Potter,et al.  A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part V: Syntax, Fourth Volume@@@A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI: Morphology , 1947 .

[43]  I. Plag Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisited: a reply to Fabb (1988) , 1996 .

[44]  J. Hawkins Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[45]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[46]  D. Kastovsky The problem of productivity in word formation , 1986 .

[47]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Words and rules , 1998 .

[48]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[49]  R. Baayen,et al.  The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Joan Bybee Joan Bybee: Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[51]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[52]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[53]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: the case of Finnish compared with Dutch and Hebrew. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  V. V. Heuven,et al.  Automatische indeling van Nederlandse woorden op basis van etymologische filters , 1995 .

[56]  J. Hay Causes and Consequences of Word Structure , 2003 .

[57]  K. P. Mohanan,et al.  The Theory of Lexical Phonology , 1982 .

[58]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Semantic Density and Past-Tense Formation in Three Germanic Languages , 2005 .

[59]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[60]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[61]  C. Barker,et al.  Episodic-ee in English : A thematic role constraint on new word formation , 1998 .

[62]  M. Ljung English denominal adjectives : a generative study of the semantics of a group of high-frequency denominal adjectives in English , 1973 .

[63]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[64]  Lee H. Wurm,et al.  Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities , 2007 .

[65]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  Reading complex words : cross-language studies , 2003 .

[66]  H. Marchand Categories And Types Of Present Day English Word Formation , 1971 .

[67]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  How Complex Simplex Words can be , 1997 .

[68]  Anne Cutler Productivity in word formation , 1980 .

[69]  Andrew Spencer,et al.  Ingo Plag, Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints on English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. , 2001 .

[70]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words , 2006 .

[71]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Information structure and efficiency in speech production , 2003, INTERSPEECH.

[72]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[73]  I. Plag Morphological haplology in a constraint-based morpho-phonology , 1998 .

[74]  Bas Aarts,et al.  The Handbook of English Linguistics , 2008 .

[75]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language , 2000 .

[76]  R. Baayen,et al.  Chronicling the Times: Productive Lexical Innovations in an English Newspaper , 1996 .

[77]  Ottojespersen A Modern English Grammar On Historical Principles Part Vi , 1954 .

[78]  Valerie Adams,et al.  Complex Words in English , 2001 .

[79]  D. Siegel Topics in English morphology , 1979 .

[80]  R. Baayen,et al.  Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon , 2007 .

[81]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Twenty-first century psycholinguistics : four cornerstones , 2005 .

[82]  M. Taft A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation , 1988 .

[83]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[84]  J. Hay Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? , 2001 .

[85]  R. Baayen,et al.  Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing , 2004, Cognition.

[86]  Nigel Fabb,et al.  English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions , 1988 .

[87]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  [Regression modeling strategies]. , 2011, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[88]  Y. Malkiel 19. Why AP- ISH but worm- Y ? , 1977 .

[89]  H. Marchand The categories and types of present-day English word-formation : a synchronic-diachronic approach , 1960 .

[90]  Bohdan Saciuk The stratal division of the lexicon , 1969 .

[91]  M. Ryder,et al.  Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of - er formations in Present-day English , 1999, English Language and Linguistics.

[92]  S. Pinker Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language , 1999 .

[93]  Richard Wiese,et al.  Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languages , 1998 .

[94]  R. Schreuder,et al.  Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[95]  P. Kiparsky From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology , 1982 .

[96]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[97]  J. Faraway Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models , 2005 .

[98]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Effects of Family Size for Complex Words , 2000 .

[99]  Yuen Ren Chao,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .

[100]  Karen C. Kossuth,et al.  Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics , 1982 .

[101]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Morphological structure in language processing , 2003 .

[102]  E. Riddle A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes -ness and -ity , 1985 .

[103]  Otto Jespersen,et al.  Modern English Grammar , 1910, The School Review.

[104]  S. Pinker Words and rules in the human brain , 1997, Nature.

[105]  I. Plag Morphological Productivity , 1999 .

[106]  Andrew Spencer,et al.  Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar , 1991 .

[107]  S Pinker,et al.  Rules of language. , 1991, Science.

[108]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[109]  Heinz Giegerich,et al.  Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects , 2005 .

[110]  Luigi Burzio Principles of English Stress , 1995 .

[111]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Representation and processing of derived words , 1987 .

[112]  Melissa K. Stamer,et al.  The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production , 2006, Language and cognitive processes.

[113]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[114]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Data mining at the intersection of psychology and linguistics , 2005 .

[115]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Parsing and Semantic Opacity , 2003 .

[116]  Ingo Plag,et al.  The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English , 2002 .

[117]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Variation in Dutch: From written MOGELIJK to spoken MOK , 2005 .

[118]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[119]  R. Wright Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation , 2004 .

[120]  Lee H. Wurm,et al.  Auditory Processing of Polymorphemic Pseudowords , 2000 .

[121]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[122]  J. Fisiak Historical semantics, historical word-formation , 1985 .