The Recognition Heuristic: A Review of Theory and Tests

The recognition heuristic is a prime example of how, by exploiting a match between mind and environment, a simple mental strategy can lead to efficient decision making. The proposal of the heuristic initiated a debate about the processes underlying the use of recognition in decision making. We review research addressing four key aspects of the recognition heuristic: (a) that recognition is often an ecologically valid cue; (b) that people often follow recognition when making inferences; (c) that recognition supersedes further cue knowledge; (d) that its use can produce the less-is-more effect – the phenomenon that lesser states of recognition knowledge can lead to more accurate inferences than more complete states. After we contrast the recognition heuristic to other related concepts, including availability and fluency, we carve out, from the existing findings, some boundary conditions of the use of the recognition heuristic as well as key questions for future research. Moreover, we summarize developments concerning the connection of the recognition heuristic with memory models. We suggest that the recognition heuristic is used adaptively and that, compared to other cues, recognition seems to have a special status in decision making. Finally, we discuss how systematic ignorance is exploited in other cognitive mechanisms (e.g., estimation and preference).

[1]  K C Klauer,et al.  Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Michael Smithson,et al.  When less is more in the recognition heuristic , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[3]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[4]  Rüdiger F. Pohl,et al.  On the use of recognition in inferential decision making: An overview of the debate , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[5]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Recognition-based judgments and decisions: What we have learned (so far) , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[6]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart , 1999 .

[7]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity. , 1977 .

[8]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  The use of recognition information and additional cues in inferences from memory. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Criterion knowledge: A moderator of using the recognition heuristic? , 2009 .

[10]  Lawrence T DeCarlo,et al.  An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  A. Bröder,et al.  Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  W P Banks,et al.  Recognition and Source Memory as Multivariate Decision Processes , 2000, Psychological science.

[13]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product , 1990 .

[14]  Benjamin E Hilbig,et al.  Recognizing users of the recognition heuristic. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[15]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[17]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Cognitive niches: an ecological model of strategy selection. , 2011, Psychological review.

[19]  R. Hertwig,et al.  How forgetting aids heuristic inference. , 2005, Psychological review.

[20]  A. Bröder,et al.  Predicting Wimbledon 2005 tennis results by mere player name recognition , 2007 .

[21]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Comment: Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? , 1998 .

[22]  A. Bröder,et al.  Signal detection and threshold models of source memory. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[23]  N. Brown,et al.  The role of guessing and boundaries on date estimation biases , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Caren M Rotello,et al.  Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Martin Brandt,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Measurement Models and Theories of Human Memory , 2007 .

[26]  Barbara L. Chalfonte,et al.  Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing : A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model By : , 2004 .

[27]  N. Brown Real-world estimation: Estimation modes and seeding effects , 2002 .

[28]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Good Judgments Do Not Require Complex Cognition , 2008 .

[29]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Memory for multidimensional source information. , 2002 .

[30]  P. Todd,et al.  Explaining social learning of food preferences without aversions: an evolutionary simulation model of Norway rats , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. , 1990 .

[32]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  From recognition to decisions: Extending and testing recognition-based models for multialternative inference , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  B. Galef,et al.  Further evidence that Norway rats do not socially transmit learned aversions to toxic baits , 1990 .

[35]  Rüdiger F. Pohl,et al.  Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic , 2006 .

[36]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer The secret life of fluency , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[38]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Why You Think Milan is Larger than Modena: Neural Correlates of the Recognition Heuristic , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Beyond the null ritual : Formal modeling of psychological processes , 2009 .

[41]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Chapter 107 The Recognition Heuristic: A Fast and Frugal Way to Investment Choice? , 2008 .

[42]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  Recognition-based inference: When is less more in the real world? , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  Benjamin E. Hilbig,et al.  Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[44]  Lutz Cüpper,et al.  The Four-States Model of Memory Retrieval Experiences , 2007 .

[45]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Shaping Social Environments with Simple Recognition Heuristics , 2007 .

[46]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[48]  L. Schooler,et al.  Cognitive aging and the adaptive use of recognition in decision making. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[49]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Herbert Simon’s spell on judgment and decision making , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[50]  Magnus Persson,et al.  PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): a "lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge , 2002 .

[51]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Subjective reports and process dissociation: Fluency, knowing, and feeling , 1998 .

[52]  C. Sattler,et al.  Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: The role of perceived differences in item recognition , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  Caren A. Frosch,et al.  A Little Learning is a Dangerous Thing: An Experimental Demonstration of Ignorance-Driven Inference , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Made to Measure: Ecological Rationality in Structured Environments , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[55]  Xiangen Hu,et al.  Extending General Processing Tree Models to Analyze Reaction Time Experiments. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[56]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Fast and Frugal Heuristics Are Plausible Models of Cognition: Reply To , 2022 .

[57]  Stefan M. Herzog,et al.  Fluency heuristic: a model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Measuring source memory , 2007 .

[59]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[60]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Metacognitive Guessing Strategies in Source Monitoring , 2008 .

[61]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[62]  Benjamin E. Hilbig,et al.  Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming Famous Overnight : Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past , 2004 .

[64]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[65]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  L. Schooler,et al.  The aging decision maker: cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[67]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[68]  N. Schwarz,et al.  The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. , 2002 .

[69]  Thorsten Pachur The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[70]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Homo heuristicus Outnumbered: Comment on Gigerenzer and Brighton (2009) , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[71]  E. Loftus,et al.  The revelation effect for autobiographical memory: A mixture-model analysis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[72]  John R. Anderson Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory , 1974 .

[73]  David R Shanks,et al.  On the role of recognition in decision making. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition: A discrete-state approach , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  Caren A. Frosch,et al.  Fast and frugal framing effects? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  David R. Shanks,et al.  I like what I know: Is recognition a non-compensatory determiner of consumer choice? , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[77]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The beauty of simple models: Themes in recognition heuristic research , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[78]  E. Brunswik Organismic achievement and environmental probability. , 1943 .

[79]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[80]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[81]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. , 1996 .

[82]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[83]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[84]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Threshold models of recognition and the recognition heuristic , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[85]  Thorsten Meiser,et al.  Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[86]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[87]  B. Murdock Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). , 1997 .

[88]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[89]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[90]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[91]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Not so fast! (and not so frugal!): rethinking the recognition heuristic , 2003, Cognition.

[92]  G. V. Nakamura,et al.  The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[93]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  You can't not believe everything you read. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[94]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[95]  Brent Snook,et al.  Recognizing National Hockey League greatness with an ignorance-based heuristic. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[96]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  On the binary quality of recognition and the inconsequentiality of further knowledge: two critical tests of the recognition heuristic , 2006 .

[97]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  The recognition heuristic in memory‐based inference: is recognition a non‐compensatory cue? , 2008 .

[98]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: A decade of research , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[99]  Christian Frings,et al.  Who will win Wimbledon? The recognition heuristic in predicting sports events , 2006 .

[100]  T. Cockburn The evolution of infectious diseases. , 1959, International record of medicine.

[101]  D. Gilbert How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[102]  E. Weber,et al.  Content and Discontent: Indications and Implications of Domain Specificity in Preferential Decision Making , 1995 .

[103]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[104]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[105]  Kenneth P. Uhl,et al.  Influence of Beer Brand Identification on Taste Perception , 1964 .

[106]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Can ignorance beat the stock market , 1999 .

[107]  Benjamin E. Hilbig,et al.  Think or blink — is the recognition heuristic an “intuitive” strategy? , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[108]  E. Weber,et al.  Communicating Asset Risk: How Name Recognition and the Format of Historic Volatility Information Affect Risk Perception and Investment Decisions , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[109]  Riitta Jääskeläinen,et al.  Who Said What? , 2003 .

[110]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Why recognition is rational: Optimality results on single-variable decision rules , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[111]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. , 2009 .

[112]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[113]  P. Todd,et al.  More Is Not Always Better: The Benefits of Cognitive Limits , 2003 .

[114]  M. Dougherty,et al.  Integration of the ecological and error models of overconfidence using a multiple-trace memory model. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[115]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  One-reason decision making unveiled: a measurement model of the recognition heuristic. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[116]  C. Gettys,et al.  MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. , 1999 .

[117]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  The less-is-more effect: Predictions and tests , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[118]  P. Suppes,et al.  Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology , 1976 .

[119]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[120]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[121]  Lawrence T. DeCarlo,et al.  Source monitoring and multivariate signal detection theory, with a model for selection , 2003 .

[122]  Rick P. Thomas,et al.  Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics. , 2008, Psychological review.

[123]  Timothy J. Pleskac,et al.  A signal detection analysis of the recognition heuristic , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[124]  Michael Boyd,et al.  On Ignorance, Intuition, and Investing: A Bear Market Test of the Recognition Heuristic , 2001 .

[125]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  Forecasting from ignorance: the use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[126]  J A SWETS,et al.  Is there a sensory threshold? , 1961, Science.

[127]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[128]  Tim Rakow,et al.  Now you see it now you don ’ t : The effectiveness of the recognition heuristic for selecting stocks , 2007 .

[129]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.