Determination of Solute—Aggregate Binding Constants of Some Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography in the Presence of CTAB—Alcohol—Water Systems with High Percentages of Alcohol

This work presents the chromatographic study of the association between 5 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the aggregates formed by a cationic surfactant in the presence of a high percentage of two different alcohols, n-propanol (20‐50%, v/v) and ethanol (50‐75%, v/v). A generalization of the classical equations for micellar liquid chromatography can be used in order to determine the solute‐aggregates binding constants. Also, by means of a multiple regression, it is possible to obtain an equation that relates the chromatographic retention (expressed as the inverse of the retention factor) and the surfactant and alcohol concentrations. This equation allows one to carry out an estimate of the association constants for any quantity of alcohol.

[1]  P. Luisi,et al.  Reverse Micelles: Biological and Technological Relevance of Amphiphilic Structures in Apolar Media , 1999 .

[2]  M. Marina,et al.  Evaluation of distribution coefficients in micellar liquid chromatography , 1997 .

[3]  J. R. Torres-Lapasió,et al.  Modelling of retention behaviour of solutes in micellar liquid chromatography , 1997 .

[4]  M. Medina-Hernández,et al.  Reliability of the capacity factor at zero micellar concentration and the solute-micelle association constant estimates by micellar liquid chromatography. , 1997, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  E. Rodenas,et al.  A Phase Diagram of theN-Cetylpiridinium Chloride/1-BuOH/Water Ternary System , 1997 .

[6]  M. Marina,et al.  Influence of Alcohol Organic Modifiers Upon the Association Constants and Retention Mechanism for Aromatic Compounds in Micellar Liquid Chromatography , 1996 .

[7]  J. R. Torres-Lapasió,et al.  Description of the partitioning behaviour of solutes and data treatment in micellar liquid chromatography with modifiers , 1996 .

[8]  J. Fritz,et al.  Novel additives for the separation of organic compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography , 1996 .

[9]  S. Vera,et al.  Chromatographic Retention of Ni(II), Co(II) and Cu(II) as Diethyldithio-carbamate Complexes in Presence of Surfactant/n-Propanol/Water Systems: Determination of Micellar Binding Constants , 1996 .

[10]  L. Polo-Díez,et al.  Study of Pah's Separation and Phase-Solute Interaction by Micellar Liquid Chromatography , 1995 .

[11]  M. Valiente,et al.  Study of the Phase Diagram of the CTAB/Benzyl Alcohol/Water System , 1995 .

[12]  M. Marina,et al.  Determination of Ni(II), Co(II) and Cu(II) as diethyldithiocarbamate complexes by high-performance liquid chromatography using hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide in the mobile phase , 1994 .

[13]  J. R. Torres-Lapasió,et al.  Interpretive strategy for optimization of surfactant and alcohol concentration in micellar liquid chromatography , 1994 .

[14]  M. Rodríguez Delgado,et al.  Solute-micelle association constants of some polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by micellar liquid chromatography with alcohol additives to mobile phase , 1994 .

[15]  J. R. Torres-Lapasió,et al.  Modelling of the retention behaviour of solutes in micellar liquid chromatography with organic modifiers , 1993 .

[16]  M. Valiente,et al.  Influence of CTAB/alkanol/cyclohexane w/o microemulsions on the basic hydrolysis of crystal violet , 1993 .

[17]  M. Rodríguez-Delgado,et al.  Solute-micelle association constants and correlation of octanol-water coefficients with hydrophobicity for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by micellar chromatography , 1992 .

[18]  M. Valiente,et al.  The determination of some physical properties of reverse CTAB micelles in 1-hexanol , 1992 .

[19]  M. Auweraer,et al.  Influence of alcohols and alkanes on the aggregation behavior of ionic surfactants in water , 1990 .

[20]  M. Borgerding,et al.  Characterization and evaluation of the use of nonionic polyoxyethylene(23)dodecanol micellar mobile phases in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography , 1985 .

[21]  L. Love,et al.  Model for micellar effects on liquid chromatography capacity factors and for determination of micelle-solute equilibrium constants , 1984 .

[22]  J. Dorsey,et al.  Efficiency enhancement in micellar liquid chromatography , 1983 .

[23]  P. Lianos,et al.  Effect of alcohol on the properties of micellar systems. Part 1. Critical micellization concentration, micelle molecular weight and ionization degree , 1981 .

[24]  S. Swarup,et al.  Effect of monohydroxy alcohols and urea on the CMC of surfactants. , 1978 .

[25]  V. González,et al.  Influence of Several Parameters on Efficiency and Peak Shape in the Micellar Liquid Chromatography of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons , 1996 .

[26]  J. Foley.  Critical compilation of solute-micelle binding constants and related parameters from micellar liquid chromatographic measurements , 1990 .

[27]  R. Weinberger,et al.  Effects of restricted mass transfer on the efficiency of micellar chromatography , 1984 .

[28]  M. Almgren,et al.  Size of sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles in the presence of additives i. alcohols and other polar compounds , 1983 .

[29]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Partitioning behavior of solutes eluted with micellar mobile phases in liquid chromatography , 1981 .