Social Identification as Situated Processes: a Proposal for Cda from a Micro-discourse Conference Organising Committee Welcome from the Conference Committee on Behalf of the Conference Organising Committee International Conference on Critical Discourse Analysis – Theory into Research Keynote Speaker

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher. The publisher is not responsible for the use which might be made of the information contained in this book. A critical analysis of the public consultation process and publications produced by the Xenotransplantation Working Party during the period 2001─2005 (Xenotransplantation─transplanting animal organs or tissue into humans). November is the best month in Tasmania when winter days have already said goodbye to the land and now the summer breeze and crystal sunlights are here to stay with us. This year, November is very special as it brings colleagues from different horizons to Tasmania to strengthen research sharing, intercultural appreciation, and international understanding. This conference has special features which we treasure dearly: • The conference has attracted participants from a wide range of academic and • Students have taken an active and leading role in organising this conference. They are the inspiring spring of the conference. We would like to thank many colleagues in the Faculty of Education and other sections of the University of Tasmania who have given us strong support and encouragement in creating this dynamic interactive research discourse. Special thanks must go to Professor Roslyn Arnold, Dean of the Faculty of Education, who is the pillar of this solid support. She has been a chair and member of Teaching and Learning Committees within universities. She acts as a consultant to education institutions and agencies engaged in developing policies and practices to enhance students' learning and teachers' professionalism. Her theory of 'empathic intelligence' has been developed from her research and scholarship in pedagogy over several decades. Her latest book This paper will explore the nature of inter-subjective and intrasubjective engagements with particular attention paid to the interface between language, thinking, feelings and relationships. The central argument is that educators need to be sensitive to the embodied language experiences of students and imagine how certain discourse experiences can enable or disable students' language development. In developing the argument, reference will be made to the ways students' writing can both reveal and conceal their thinking and feeling. Empathic intelligence will be posited as a model to enable educators to engage with students in articulating silence. Professor Peter Freebody is Professor of Education at the University of Queensland. His research …

[1]  J. Bateman,et al.  Multimodality and Empiricism , 2004 .

[2]  Marie-Noëlle Lamy,et al.  Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments , 2004, ReCALL.

[3]  Alyson Simpson What Happens When a Book Gets Judged by Its Cover? The Importance of a CriticaI Understanding of Images in Children's Picture Books , 2004 .

[4]  L. Mondada Ways of''Doing Being Plurilingual''in International Work Meetings , 2004 .

[5]  Rick Iedema,et al.  Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization , 2003 .

[6]  R. Torraco Cognitive Demands of New Technologies and the Implications for Learning Theory , 2002 .

[7]  Richard Beach,et al.  Preservice English teachers acquiring literacy practices through technology tools , 2002 .

[8]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  The move from page to screen: the multimodal reshaping of school English , 2002 .

[9]  Norman Fairclough,et al.  Understanding the new management ideology: a transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism , 2002 .

[10]  Pepi Leistyna Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis , 2001 .

[11]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet , 2001 .

[12]  Michael Meyer 2 Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA , 2001 .

[13]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse as a Strategic Resource , 2000 .

[14]  Henry Widdowson,et al.  On the limitations of linguistics applied , 2000 .

[15]  Daniel Yergin,et al.  The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy , 1998 .

[16]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Text and clause: Fractal resonance , 1995 .

[17]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[18]  C. Poynton Grammar, language and the social: Poststructuralism and systemic‐functional linguistics , 1993 .

[19]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Writing Science: Literacy And Discursive Power , 1993 .

[20]  Macro-Proposals: Meaning by Degree , 1992 .

[21]  S. Thompson,et al.  Discourse description : diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text , 1992 .

[22]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality , 1991 .

[23]  M. Volman,et al.  Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern , 1994 .

[24]  Daniel Kolb Critique of Judgment , 1988 .

[25]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[26]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[27]  M. Halliday,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR (Third Edition) , 2022 .